한국농림기상학회지 (Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)

  • 제5권2호
  • /
  • Pages.94-100
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 1229-5671(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-1859(eISSN)
한국농림기상학회 (Korean Society of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)
권호 표지

폐회로 역학 챔버 시스템을 이용한 토양 이산화탄소 플럭스 관측

Measurement of Soil CO2 Efflux Using a Closed Dynamic Chamber System

  • 채남이 (연세대학교 지구환경연구소/이과대학 대기과학과) ;
  • 김준 (연세대학교 지구환경연구소/이과대학 대기과학과) ;
  • 김동길 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경 계획학과) ;
  • 이도원 (서울대학교 환경대학원 환경 계획학과) ;
  • 김래현 (고려대학교 환경 생태 공학부) ;
  • 반지연 (고려대학교 환경 생태 공학부) ;
  • 손요환 (고려대학교 환경 생태 공학부)
  • Chae, Nam-yi (Global Environment Laboratory/Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Joon (Global Environment Laboratory/Department of Atmospheric Sciences, College of Natural Sciences, Yonsei University) ;
  • Kim, Dong-gill (Department of Environmental Planning, The Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Do-won (Department of Environmental Planning, The Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Rae-Hyun (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Ban, Ji-yeon (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Son, Yo-whan (Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 발행 : 2003.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

토양으로부터의 $CO_2$ 방출은 생태계의 탄소 순환에 중요한 위치를 차지한다. 주요 생태계의 순 $CO_2$ 교환과 일차 생산량 등을 정확히 산출하려면 군락 $CO_2$ 플럭스와 더불어 토양 $CO_2$ 플럭스의 관측이 함께 이루어져야 한다. 본 논문에서는 닫힌 역학 챔버 시스템을 활용한 토양 이산화탄소 플럭스의 관측 방법을 간략히 검토하고, 한반도 주요 생태계에 구축된 한국 타워 플럭스 관측 지역망(KoFlux)의 거점 관측소에서 예비 관측된 결과와 서로 다른 관측 시스템간의 상호비교 결과를 보고하고자 한다.

Soil $CO_2$ emission is one of the primary components in carbon balance of terrestrial ecosystems. To accurately assess their net ecosystem exchange of $CO_2$ and net primary production, measurement of soil $CO_2$ efflux is required along with that of canopy $CO_2$ flux. In this paper, soil $CO_2$ flux measurement technique using closed dynamic chamber systems is briefly reviewed. Preliminary results on soil $CO_2$ exchange and inter-comparison of different measurement systems currently used in Korean regional network of tower flux measurement sites (KoFlux) are also reported.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, T., J. Kim and J. Lim, 2003: $CO_2$ exchange in Kwangneung broadleaf deciduous forest during the summer of 2002. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, this issue.
  2. Davidson, E. A., K. Savage, L. V. Verchot and Navarro, Rosa, 2002: Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamberbased measurements of soil respiration. Agricultural Forest Meteorology, 113, 21-37.
  3. Fang, C. and J. B. Moncrieff, 2001: The dependence of soil $CO_2$ efflux on temperature. Soil Biology & Biochemistry, 33, 155-165.
  4. Janssens, I. A., A. S. Kowalski, B. Longdoz, and R. Ceulemans, 2000: Assessing forest soil $CO_2$ efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques. Tree Physiology, 20, 23-32.
  5. Kim, J. and S. B. Verma, 1992: Soil surface $CO_2$ flux in a Minnesota peatland. Biogeochemistry, 18, 37-51.
  6. Kim, J., W. Kim, C. -H. Cho, B. C. Choi, H. S. Chung, B. L. Lee, K. H. Kim, K. R. Kim, M. Y. Kim, B. Y. Lee, G. W. Lee, J. T. Lee, J. H. Lim, H. H. Oh, E. W. Park, J. S. Shim, J. I. Yun and C. S. Rho, 2002: KoFlux: A new tool to study the biosphere-atmosphere interactions in Asia, Ecology of Korea, D. Lee (Eds.), Seoul, 215-229.
  7. Law, B. E., F. M. Kelliher, D. D. Baldocchi, P. M. Anthoni, J. Irvine, D. Moore and S. V. Tuyl, 2001: Spatial and temporal variation in respiration in a young ponderosa pine forest during a summer drought. Agricultural Forest Meteorology, 110, 27-43.
  8. Lee, H., J. Hong, C. Cho, B. Choi, S. Oh, and J. Kim, 2003: Surface exchange of energy and carbon dioxide between the atmosphere and a farmland in Haenam, Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, this issue.
  9. LI-COR, Inc., 1997: LI-COR 6400-09 Soil Flux Chamber Instruction Manual. Lincoln, Nebraska.
  10. Longdoz B,,M. Yernaux, and M. Aubinet, 2000: Soil $CO_2$ efflux measurements in a mixed forest: impact of chamber disturbances, spatial variability and seasonal evolution. Global Change Biology, 6, 907-917.
  11. Lund, C., W. Riley, L. Pierce and C. Field, 1999: The effects of chamber pressurization on soil-surface $CO_2$ flux and the implications for NEE measurements under elevated $CO_2$. Global Change Biology, 5, 269-281.
  12. Moon, B., J. Hong, B. Lee, J. Yun, E. Park and J. Kim, 2003: $CO_2$ and Energy Exchange in a Rice Paddy for the Growing Season of 2002 in Hari, Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, this issue.
  13. Nay, S. M., K. G. Mattson and B. T. Bormann, 1994: Biases of chamber methods for measuring soil $CO_2$ efflux demonstrated with a laboratory apparatus. Ecology, 75, 2460-2463.
  14. Norman, J. M., R. Garcia and S. B. Verma, 1992: Soil surface $CO_2$ fluxes and the carbon budget of a grassland. Journal of Geophysical Research, 97(D17), 18,845-18,853.
  15. Norman, J. M., C. J. Kucharik, S. T. Gower, D. D. Baldochi, P. M. Crill, M. Rayment, K. Savage and R. G. Striegl, 1997: A comparison of six methods for measuring soil-surface carbon dioxide fluxes. Agricultural Forest Meteorology, 102, 28,771-28,777.
  16. PP Systems: 1993. SRC-1 Soil respiration system operator''s manual version 3.1. Hitchin, U.K.
  17. Ryment, M. B. and P. G. Jarvis, 1997: An improved open chamber system for measuring soil $CO_2$ effluxes in the field. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102(D24), 28,779-28,784.
  18. Rayment, M. B., 2000: Closed chamber systems underestimate soil $CO_2$ efflux. European Journal of Soil Science, 51, 107-110.
  19. Rey, A., E. Pegoraro, V. Tedeschi, I. Parri, P. G. Jarvis and R. Valentini, 2002: Annual variation in soil respiration and its components in a coppice oak forest in Central Italy. Global Change Biology, 8, 851-866.
  20. Tang, J., D. D. Baldocchi, Y. Qi and L. Xu, 2003:Assessing soil $CO_2$ efflux using continuous measurements of profiles in soils with small solid-state sensors. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology (in press).
  21. Valentni, R., G. Matteucci, A. J. Dolman, E. D. Schulze, C. Renmann, E. J. Moors, A. Granier, P. Gross, N. O. Jensen, K. Pilegaard, A. Lindroth, A. Grelle, C. Bernhofer, T. Grumwald, M. Aubunet, R. Ceulemans, A. S. Kowaslski, T. Vesala, U. Rannik, P. Berbigier, D. Loustau, J. Guomundsson, H. Thorgeirsson, A. Ibrom, K. Morgenstern, R. Clement, J. Moncrieff, L. Montagnani, S. Minerbi and P. G. Jarvis, 2000: Respiration as the main determinant of carbon balance in European forests. Nature, 404, 861-865.
  22. Welles, J. M., T. H. Demetriades-Shah and D. K. McDermitt, 2001: Cosiderations for measuring ground$CO_2$ effluxes with chambers. Chemical Geology, 177, 3-13.
  23. Yim, M. H., S. J. Joo and K. Nakane, 2002: Comparison of field methods for measuring soil respiration: a static alkali absorption method and two dynamic closed chamber methods. Forest Ecology and Management, 170, 189-197.
  24. Yim, M. H., S. J. Joo, K. Shutou and K. Nakane, 2003:Spatial variability of soil respiration in a larch plantation:estimation of the number of sampling points required. Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 585-588.