KOREAN JOURNAL OF CROP SCIENCE (한국작물학회지)

The Korean Society of Crop Science (한국작물학회)
권호 표지

Difference of Major Characters by Spring Sowing of Forage Rape

춘파재배에 따른 사초용유채의 주요형질차이

  • 권병선 (순천대학교 농업생명과학대학) ;
  • 신정식 (순천대학교 자연과학대학)
  • Published : 2003.06.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To select the most suitable variety of forage rape for growth in the southern part of Korea, Seven introduced varieties were grown from Mar, 1999 to August 2000. Velox was shown to have the highest dry matter yield in comparison to other varieties used in this experiment. It showed relatively high content of crude protein and in virto dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and low content of NDF, ADF, cellulose and lignin. Therefore, it was concluded that Velox was the most suitable variety with high yield and high nutrient quality for spring in the southern part of Korea. The heritabilities of all the observed characters were estimated to be high.

남부지역에 적응한 사초용 유채의 춘파 품종을 선발하기 위하여 3월 25일에 파종한 그 결과는 다음과 같다. 1. 다수성이며 조단백질 함량과 in vitro dry matter digestibility(IVDMD)가 높고 NDF, ADF, cellulose 및 lignin 함량이 낮아서 영양가가 우수한 춘파 용 사초 유채는 Velox 품종이었다. 2. Velox품종은 초장이 길고 경태가 두꺼웠으며 주경의 잎도 많았고 생체중 과 총건물수량이 가장 많았다. 3. 모든 형질에 대한 유전력은 대부분의 형질에서 높았으나 hemicellulose에서만이 낮게 평가되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. AOAC. 1970. Official methods of analysis, llth ed
  2. Berendonk, C. 1982a. Effect of harvest date on yield and quality of spring and winter swede rape varieties grown as a catch crop. I. Yield, leaf, stem ratio and dry matter content. Wirtschaftseigene Futter. 28(2): 156-165. Via Herb. Ahst. 53(6): 2333, 1983
  3. Berendonk, C. 1982b. Influence of harvest date on yield and quality of spring and winter rape cultivars grown as catch crops. Part 2 Crnde ash, crude fiber and crude protein content and digestibility of organic matter. Wirts. Futter. 28(3) : 202-214. Via Herb. Abst. 54(2-3): 502, 1984
  4. Berendonk, C. 1983a. The effect of harvesting date on the yield and content of nutrient and mineral substances in summer and winter rape varieties grown as a catch crop. Zeitschrift fur Acker-und Pflanzenbau. 152(2): 125-134. Via Herb. Abst. 54: 4281, 1984
  5. Berendonk, C. 1983b. Which rape variety to use for fodder? DLG-Mit-teilungen. 98(10): 578-580. Via Herb. Abst. 54(2-3): 598, 1984
  6. Kwon, B. S., J. I. Lee, S. K. Kim, and J. K. Bang. 1984. Response of fertilizer Application Levels. The Memorial Papers for the sixtieth Birthday of Dr. Kyu Yong Chung : 51-59
  7. Goering, H. L. and P. J. Van Soest. 1970. Forage fiber analysis. Agr. Handbook, No. 379 USDA
  8. Goto, I. and D. J. Minson. 1977. Predition of the dry matter digestibil-ity of tropical grasses using a pepsin-cellulase assay. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 2 : 247-253 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(77)90028-1
  9. Grafius, J. E., W. S. Nelson, and V. A. Dirks. 1952. The heritability of yield in barley as measured by early generation bulked progenies. Agron. J. 44 : 253-257 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1952.00021962004400050008x
  10. Groppel, B., M. Anke, D. Gladitz, and Dittrich. 1982. The supply of nutrients major elements and trace elements for wild ruminunts. 6th report. The nutrient content of winter grazing. Herb. Abst. 52(5):2182
  11. Gupta, P.C., R. Singh, and K.. Pradhan. 1974. Chemical composition and in vitro nutrient digestibility of some Brassica species grown for fodder. Harayana Agr. Univ. Res. 4 : 176-178
  12. Harper, F. and I.J. Compton, 1980. Sowing date, harvest date and the yield of forage Brassica crops. Grass and Forage Sci. 35 : 147-157 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1980.tb01504.x
  13. Harris, C. E. 1964. Comparison of in vitro and in vitro measurements of the digestibility of fodder crops. J. Bri. Grassld. Soc. 19 : 189
  14. Jung, G. A., R.E. Kocher, and A. Glica. 1984. Minimum-tillage forage turnip and rape production on hill land as influenced by sod suppression and fertilizer. Agron. J. 76(3): 404-408 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600030011x
  15. Jung, G. A., R. A., Byers, M.T. Panciers, and J.A. Shaffer. 1986. Forage dry matter accumulation and quality of turnip, swede, rape, Chinese cabbage hybrids and kale in the Eastem USA. Agrom. J. 78 : 245-253 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1986.00021962007800020006x
  16. Kay, M. 1975. Root crops and Brassicae for beef production. J. Bri. Grassld. Soc. 30 : 85-86 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.1975.tb01358.x
  17. Robinson, H. F., R. E. Comstock, and P. H. Harvey. 1949. Estimates of heritability and the degree of dominance in corn. Agron. J. 41 : 353-359 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1949.00021962004100080005x
  18. Toxopeus, H. and J. G. Boonman. 1983. Forage rape and stubble tur-nips. oilseedradish and white mustard. Zaadbelaneen 37 : 36-39
  19. 김동암, 성경일, 조무환. 1986. 사초용유채와 연맥, 호맥, 라이그라스, 순무 간의 추계생산성 비교. 한국축산학회지. 28(2) : 117-120
  20. 안계수, 권병선, 노승표, 五斗 郞. 1989. 사초용유채의 생산성과사료가치에 관한연구 I. 남부지역에 적응한 사초용 유채의 품종선발. 한국축산학회지 31(3) : 179-191
  21. 이정일. 권병선. 1981a. 유채의 지방산조성개량육종에 관한 연구I 양질유. 양질박 유채품종들의 숙기 및 실용형질에 대한 유전통계량의 지역간 변이. 한국육종학회지. 13(1) : 31-39
  22. 이정일. 권병선. 1981b. 유채의 지방산조성개량육종에 관한 연구Ⅱ. 성분개량유채품종의 숙기 및 실용형질에 대한 유전통계량의 연차간 변동. 한국육종학회지. 13(2) : 126-133
  23. 이정일, 방진기, 권병선, 민경수. 1984. 유채박 사료화를 위한 유독성분 GIucosinolate 개량육종에 관한연구 I. 도입지역에 따른유채품종의 Glucosinolate 함량차이. 한국육종학회지 16(2) : 171-179