Responses of Mungbean Varieties to Rhizobium Inoculation in respect of Nodulation, Nitrogenase Activity, Dry Matter Yield, and Nitrogen Uptake

  • A.R.M. Solaiman (Department of Soil Science, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University) ;
  • M.M. Haque (Department of Agronomy, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01

초록

The responses of six mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] varieties to Rhizobium inoculation on number and dry weight of nodules, nitrogenase activity of root nodule bacteria, dry weight of shoot and root, nitrogen content, and uptake by shoot were investigated. The mungbean varieties were BARI Mung-2, BARI Mung-3, BARI Mung-4, BARI Mung-5, BINA Moog-2, and BU Mung-1. Two-third seeds of each variety were inoculated with Rhizobium inoculant and the remaining one-third seeds were kept uninoculated. Rhizobium strains TAL 169 and TAL 441 were used for inoculation of seeds. Inoculation of seeds with Rhizobium strains significantly increased nodulation, nitrogenases activity, dry matter production, nitrogen content, and uptake by shoot of the crop compared to uninoculated control. There was positive correlation among the number and dry weight of nodules, nitrogenase activity, dry weight of shoot and root, nitrogen content, and uptake by shoot of the crop. It was concluded that BARI Mung-4 in association with Rhizobium strain TAL 169 performed best in recording nodulation, nitrogenase activity, dry matter production, and nitrogen uptake by shoot of mungbean.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alam, M.J., A.R.M. Solaiman., AJ.M.S. Karim, and M.T. Hossain. 1999.Potential of some Rhizobium strains on nodulation, nitrogen fixation, crop growth and dry matter production of chickpea.Bangladesh J. Microbial. 16(2) : 107-114.
  2. Bhuiyan, Z.H., M.S. Hoque, and M.H. Mian. 1984. Field trial at BAU Farm on the effect of Rhizobium inoculation on mungbean. 1$^{st}$ Ann. Report on B.N.F. under irrigated and rainfed conditions. 11-14
  3. Essa, T.A and H.M. Al- Dulaimi. 1985. Nodulation response of soybean to nitrogen application and inoculation. Iraq. J. Agril. Sci. "Aznco" 3(3) : 27-35
  4. Eusuf Zai, A.K.E., A.R.M. Solaiman, and J.U. Ahmed. 1999. Response of some chickpea varietiesto Rhizobium inoculation in respect of nodulation, biological nitrogen fixation and dry matter yield.Bangladesh J. Microbial. 16(2): 135-144.
  5. Gupta, R.P., V.P.S. Chahal, D.S. Chahal, and M.S. Kalra. 1976. Effect of inoculation and pelleting on mungbean. J. Res. Punjab Agril. Univ. 13(4) : 395-397
  6. Hardy, R.W.F., R.D. Holsten,E.K. Jackson, and R.C. Bums. 1968. The acetylene-ethylene assay for Nrfixation: laboratory and field evaluation. Plant physiol.43:1185-1207. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.43.8.1185
  7. Hoque, M.S. 1991. Collection and characterization of Rhizobium bacteriaand their effectiveness on some important food legume crops in Bangladesh. Proc. BAD. Res. Prog. Mymensingh. 91-97
  8. Khan, M.S.H., A.R.M. Solaiman., M.S. Hoque, and M.M. Rahman. 1997. Response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation and NPK fertilization: Nodulation, dry matter production and N uptake.Ann. Bangladesh Agric. 7(1) : 21-26
  9. Mahmud, M.S.,A.R.M. Solaiman, M.S. Hoque,and M.A. Hashem. 1997. Influence of Rhizobium inoculant and nitrogen on nodulation, growthandN uptakeof lentil. Ann. Bangladesh Agric. 7(2) : 139-143
  10. Maurya, B.R, C.L. Sonaria, and P.C. Ram. 1987. Combined culture treatment enhanced nodulation,yield and quality of chick pea. Seeds and Farms. 13(8) : 25-33
  11. Miles, A.A. and S.S. Misra. 1938. The estimation of the bacteriocidal power of blood. J. Hyg. Camb. 38 : 732-749 https://doi.org/10.1017/S002217240001158X
  12. Rahman, M.M. and A.A. Miah. 1988. Mungbean in Bangladesh: Problems and prospects. In Mungbean: Asian Vegetable Research Development Centre, Shanhua, Taiwan
  13. Rao, N.S.S. 1980. Role of bacteria in crop production. India Farming. 30(7) :71,73 and 75
  14. Rasal, P.H. and Patil L. 1989. A study on inoculum load of Rhizobium on some pulses. College of Agriculture, Pune 411005, Maharashtra. Ind. J. harashtra Agril. Univ. 14(2) : 234-235
  15. Satter, M.A and S.U. Ahmed. 1992. Response of mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) to inoculation with Bradyrhizobium as affected by phosphorus levels. Proc. Conf. Commission IV, Bangladesh. 1-3 December 1992. pp. 419-423
  16. Singh, P. and Chaubey. 1971. Inoculation a cheap source of nitrogen to legumes. Ind. Farming. 20(10) : 33-34
  17. Solaiman, A.R.M. I999a. Effects of Bradyrhizobium japonicum inoculation and molybdenum on soybean. Bangladesh J. Bot. 28(2) : 181-183
  18. Solaiman, A.R.M. 1999b. Response of mungbean to Bradyrhizobium sp. (Vigna) inoculation with and without phosphorus and potassium fertilization. Bangladesh J. Sci. Res. 17(2) :125-132
  19. Solaiman, A.R.M., M.S.H. Khan, and M.S. Hoque. 1999. Effects of Rhizobium inoculant and NPK on nodulation, growth and yield of chickpea Cicer arietinum L. J. Asiat. Soc. Bangladesh Sci. 25(2) : 181-188
  20. Wilde, S.A, R.B. Corey, and J.G. Iyer. 1979. Soil and Plant Analysis for Tree Culture. Soil Science, University of Wisconsin, G.K. Voigt, Yale School of Forestry. 78