DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

경관생태적 측면에서의 도시 에코톱의 분류방법 및 특성분석 - 대구광역시를 사례지로 -

The Analysis of Classification Method and Characteristics of Urban Ecotopes on the Landscape Ecological Aspect - The Case of Metropolitan Daegu -

  • 나정화 (경북대학교 조경학과) ;
  • 이정민 (경북대학교 대학원 조경학과)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01

초록

The purpose of this research was to investigate the characteristics of urban ecotopes and to classify ecotopes systematically from them. Total of 15 characteristics for classification of ecotopes were selected, and there were categorized 3 factors, that is abiotic, biotic and anthropological factors. The ecotope types in the study area were classified into 67. The classification of ecotope was made with SPSS for Windows Version 10.0 on the basis of the 15 characteristics. As the results of cluster analysis using the average linkage method between groups, groups of ecotope type were divided into 15 clusters. It was known that there was not a great difference in an affinity as the result of overlapping the maps of ecotope type and land use type. This research suggested characteristics for classification of ecotopes, but there was a limit to Set the objective method for grade classification because of lacking in the basic data, the research of characteristics will be accomplished continuously.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 나정화, 이석철, 사공정희, 류연수, 2001, 생물종 및 서식지 보전의 관점에서 본 대도시의 비오톱 구조분석: 대구광역시 수성구를 중심으로, 한국조경학회지, 28(6), 29-51.
  2. 서울특별시, 2000, 도시 생태개념의 도시계획에의 적용을 위한 서울시 비오톱 현황조사 및 생태도시조성지침 수립, 1차년도 연구보고서, 3-242pp.
  3. Sukopp, H., 1980, Biotopkartierung in besiedelten bereich von Berlin, Garten und Ladnschaft, 80(7), 560-568.
  4. Lofvenhaft, K., C. Bjorn and M. Ishe, 2002, Biotope patterns in urban areas: A conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial plannin g, Landscape and Urban Plannng, 58, 223-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00223-7
  5. 나정화, 류연수, 사공정희, 2001, 평가지표에 의한 도시 비오톱의 가치평가, 한국조경학회지, 29(1), 100-112.
  6. 환경부, 1995, 전국 그린 네트워크화 구상: 사람과 생물이 어우러지는 자연 만들기, 3-208pp.
  7. 나정화, 사공정희, 류연수, 2001, 비오톱 연계망 구축을 위한 서식공간 평가: 대구시 수성구를 중심으로, 한국조경학회지, 29(1), 67-79.
  8. 조영동, 1998, 도시생태계 보전을 위한 비오톱맵핑의 적용과 활용방안에 관한 연구: 수치지도의 도입과 GIS의 활용을 중심으로, 서울대학교 환경대학원 석사학위논문, 1-73pp.
  9. Sukopp, H. and S. Weiler, 1988, Biotope mapping and nature conservation strategies in urban areas of the federal republic of germany, Landscape and Urban Planning, 15, 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(88)90015-1
  10. Naveh, Z., 2000, What is holistic ecology?: A conceptual introduction, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 7-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00077-3
  11. Naveh, Z. and A. S. Lieberman, 1993, Landscape ecology: Theory and application, Springer Verlag, 3-360pp.
  12. Palang, H., U. Mander and Z. Naveh, 2000, Holistic landscape ecology in action, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00076-1
  13. Makhzoumi, J. M. and G. Pungetti, 1999, Ecological landscape design and planning: The Mediterranean context, E & FN SPON, 1-330pp.
  14. Leser, H., 1991, Landschaftsoekologie, Ulmer., 45-51pp.
  15. Mosimann, T., 1984, Landschaftsoekologische komplexanalyse, Wiesbaden, 110-121pp.
  16. Forman, R. T. T., 1995, Land Mosaics: The ecology of landscape and regions, Cambridge University Press, 3-524pp.
  17. Makhzoumi, J. M., 2000, Landscape ecology as a foundation for landscape architecture: Application in Malta, Landscape and Urban Planning, 50, 167-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(00)00088-8
  18. Haber, W., 1864, Ueber Landschaftspflege, Landschaft+Stad, 16, 194-198.
  19. Zonneveld, I. S., 1989, The land unit: A fundamental concept in landscape ecology, and its applications, Landscape Ecology, 3(2), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00131171
  20. 대구광역시, 2002, 대구광역도시권통계
  21. 성내경, 2000, 표본조사방법론, 자유아카데미, 1-294pp.
  22. 송영배, 2002, 도시기후지도의 작성: 상계 4동을 중심으로, 한국조경학회지, 29(6), 27-36.
  23. 이창복, 1993, 대한식물도감, 향문사, 1-990pp.
  24. Sharma, S., 1996, Applied multivariate techniques, John Wiley & Sons, 1-493pp.
  25. 박경훈, 정성관, 1999, 광역적 녹지계획 수립을 위한 도시열섬효과 분석, 한국지리정보학회지, 2(3), 35-45.
  26. Klausing, O. and G. Salay, 1974, Die abhaengigkeit der grundwasser neubildung von vegetation und bewirtschaftung, AFZ, 49, 1091-1094.
  27. Forys, E. and S. R. Humphrey, 1999, The importance of patch attributes and context to the management and recovery of an endangered lagomorph, Landscape Ecology, 14, 177-185. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008013831843
  28. Bauer, G. K., 1976, Landschaftsrahmenplan erholungspark ville, Beitraege zur Landesentwicklung, Koeln, 35, 149-173.
  29. Sukopp, H., 1969, Der Einfluss des Menschen auf die Vegetation, Vegetation, 17, 363-369.
  30. Blume, H. P. and H. Sukkop, 1976, Okologische bedeutung anthropogener bodenveraenderungen, schriftenr. f., Vegetationskunde, 10, 75-85.
  31. Kaerkes, W., 1987, Zur okologischen bedeutung urbaner freiflaechen, Diss., Universitaet Bochum, 207-262pp.
  32. O'Meara, T. E., J. R. Monkler, H. Stelter and J. G. Nagy, 1981, Nongame wildlife responses to changing of pinyon-juniper woodland, Journal of Wildlife Management, 45, 381-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/3807919
  33. Sukkop, H., 1993, Stadtoekologie, Gustav und Fischer, 1-75pp.