산업경영시스템학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering)

  • 제26권4호
  • /
  • Pages.72-81
  • /
  • 2003
  • /
  • 2005-0461(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-7975(eISSN)
한국산업경영시스템학회 (Society of Korea Industrial and System Engineering)
권호 표지

신호대 잡음비를 이용한 MLDM 문제의 선호대안 선정

The Preferred Alternative for MLDM Problems using the Signal-to-Noise Ratios

  • 이강인 (전주대학교 공학부 산업공학)
  • 발행 : 2003.12.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The purpose of this paper is to propose an interactive method, which is designed to select the optimal preferred alter-native for the MLDM(Multiple-the Larger-the better type Decision-Making) problems with the-larger-the-better quality characteristics. The basic idea of the paper is essentially to eliminate inefficient alternative based on the concept of Taguchi Signal-to-Noise ratios and the cutting range instead of using UVF(Utility/value Function) on the group of attributes that can be considered importantly by the decision makers. As a result, the method proposed in the paper for MLDM problems can be significant in that the change of characteristics is transformed into the size of Signal-to-Noise ratio, which can be relatively easy to understand by decision makers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. 박성현, 박영현; '통계적 품질관리', 민영사, pp. 573-592, 1995
  2. 이강인; '다구찌의 손실함수를 이용한 다망목특성을 가지는 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 결정', '대한 산업공학회지', 제24권, 제4호, pp.493-502, 1998
  3. 이강인, 서재훈; '다구찌의 SN비를 이용한 다망대특성을 가지는 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 선정', '한국경영과학회/대한산업공학회, 1999춘계학술대회', 서울대학교, pp.43-45, 1999
  4. 이강인, 서재훈; '신호대 잡음비를 이용한 MLDM문제의 선호대안 선정', '한국산업경영시스템학회, 2003 추계학술대회', 한양대학교, http://www.ksie.or.kr/Conference/indexl.html?order=search, 2003.
  5. 이강인, 이진식; '혼합 다속성 의사결정문제에서 선호설비의 선정', '대한설비관리학회지', 제3권, 제1호, pp.243-255, 1998
  6. 이강인, 조성구; '선호종속을 허용하는 다속성 의사 결정문제의 대화형 접근방법', '한국경영과학회지', 제20권, 제2호, pp.61-76, 1995
  7. 조성구, 이강인; '퍼지 Choquet적분을 이용한 다속성 의사결정문제의 최적 선호대안 결정', '대한산업공학회지', 제23권, 제4호, pp.635-643, 1997
  8. Barron, H., and Schmidt, C. P.; 'Sensitivity Analysis of Additive Multi-attribute Value Models', Operations Research, Vol.36, pp.l22 -127, 1988
  9. Braglia, M., and Petroni, A.; 'Evaluating and SelectingInvestments in Industrial Robots', International Journalof Production Research, Vol.37, pp4157 -4178, 1999
  10. Hwang, C. L., and Yoon, K. S.; Multiple Attribute Decision Making, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981
  11. Kackar, R. N.; 'Off-Line Quality Control, Parameter Design, and the Taguchi Method', Journal of Quality Technology, Vol.17, pp.21-29, 1985
  12. Karsak, E. E.; 'Distance-based Fuzzy Approach for Evaluating Flexible Manufacturing System Alternatives', International Journal of Production Research, Vol.40, pp.3167 -4181, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540210146062
  13. Korhonen, P. J.; 'A Hierarchical Interactive Method for Ranking Alternatives with Multiple Qualitative Criteria', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.24, pp.265 - 276, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90049-4
  14. Mareschal, B., and Brans, J. P.; 'Geometrical Representations for MCDA', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.34, pp.69 -77, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(88)90456-0
  15. Olson, D. L.; Decision Aids for Selection Problems, Splinger-Verlag, New York, 1996
  16. Peace, G. S.; Taguchi Method, Addison -Wesley, Inc., 1993.
  17. Roy, R.; A Primer on the Taguchi Method, Van Nostrand Reinhold, Inc. New York, 1990
  18. Stam, A., and Kuula, M.; 'Selecting a Flexible Manufacturing System using Multiple Criteria Analysis', Internal Journal of Production Research, Vol.29, No.4, pp.803 -820, 1991
  19. Taguchi, G.; Introduction to Quality Engineer- ing, Asian Production Organization, Tokyo, 1986
  20. Valls, A., and Torra, V.; 'Using Classification as anAggregation Tool in MCDM', Fuzzy Sets and Systems,Vol. 115, pp.159-168, 2000
  21. Vansnik, J. C.; 'On the Problem of Weights in Multiple Criteria Decision Making(The Non- compensatory Approach)', European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.24, pp.288 - 294, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(86)90051-2
  22. Yang, J. B., and Singh, M. G.; 'An Evidential Reasoning Approach for Multiple-Attribute Decision Making with Uncertainty', IEEE Transactions on System, Man, and Cybernetics, Vol.24, No.1, pp.1-16, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.259681
  23. Zeleny, M.; Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Mcgraw- Hill Book Company, New York, 1982