DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

치경부변연에서 중간층 수복이 구치부 2급 복합레진의 미세누출에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구

Microleakage at the cervical margin of Class II composite restorations with different intermediate layer treatments

  • 김기옥 (건국대학교 의과대학 치과학교실)
  • Kim, Ki-Ok (Department of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Konkuk University)
  • 발행 : 2003.11.01

초록

복합레진에 의한 구치부 2급 와동의 수복에서 치은부 변연이 법랑-백아 경계 하방에 위치하는 경우 복합레진의 중합 수축에 의한 응력은 변연부의 폐쇄능력을 저하시키고 이로인한 미세누출은 2차적인 우식이나 술후과민증을 일으켜 임상에서의 성공을 위협한다. 본 연구에서는 2급 와동에서 복합레진으로 수복하기 전에 치은 변연부를 중합수축에 의한 응력을 완화시킬 수 있는 것으로 알려진 몇가지 재료들을 중간층으로 먼저 충전한 후 충전용 복합레진으로 충전한 뒤 치은부 변연에서 이들 중간층과 치질 사이의 미세누출의 정도를 비교하였다. 20개의 발거된 구치의 근, 원심면에 각각 상자 모양의 2급 와동을 형성하고 40개의 와동을 무작위로 10개씩, 4개의군으로 나누었다. 1군은 중간층의 수복없이 Clearfil SE Bond과 Clearfil AP-X로 충전하였으며 2, 3 및 4군은 중간층으로 각각 Revolution, Dyract그리고 FujiII LG를 먼저 충전한 후 1군과 동일한 방법으로 복합레진을 충전하였다. 충전된 시편은 열순환후 2% methylene blue 용액에 12시간 침잠시킨 후 색소의 침투도를 stereomicroscope로 관찰하였으며 실험결과는 Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric independent analysis 및 Mann-Whitney U test로 통계분석하여 다음의 결론을 얻었다. 1. 레진강화형 글라스아이오노머를 중간층으로 먼저 수복하고 복합레진으로 충전한 경우에서 더 적은 미세누출을 보였다(p<0.05). 2. 유동성 레진과 콤포머를 중간층으로 수복한 경우와 복합레진만으로 수복한 경우는 미세누출에 있어서 유의한 차이를 나타내지 않았다(p>0.05).

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Geurtsen Wand Schoeler J: 4 year retrospective clinical study of class I and II composite fillings, J Dent 25:229 232, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00027-9
  2. Hickel R and Manhart J: Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure, J Adhes Dent 3:45 64, 2001
  3. Rasmusson CG and Lundin SA: Class II restorations in six different posterior composite resins: Five year results, Swed Dent J 19:173 182, 1995
  4. Wilson NHF, Wilson MA Wastell DG and Smith GA: Performance of occlusin in butt joint and bevel edged preparations: Five year results, Dent Mater 7:92 98, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(91)90052-Z
  5. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G, Neveu Rcsenstand L and Holtz J: Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restorations: an in vitro evaluation, Quintessence Int 26:717 727, 1995
  6. Dietschi D and Herzfeld D: In vitro evaluation of marginal and internal adaptation of class II resin composite restorations after thermal and occlusal stressing, Eur J Oral Sci 106: 1033 1042, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0909-8836.1998.eos106609.x
  7. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS and Ferracane JL: Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature, Quintessence Int 28:135 144, 1997
  8. Davidson CL and Feilzer AJ: Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymer based restoratives, J Dent 25:435 440, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(96)00063-2
  9. Davidson CL: Glass ionomer bases under posterior composites, J Esthet Dent 223 224, 1994
  10. van Dijken JW: A 6 year evaluation of a direct composite resin inlay/onlay system and glass ionomer cement composite resin sandwich restorations, Acta Odontol Scand 52:368 376, 1994 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029034
  11. Mark SH, James SL, Jennifer FM and James FS: Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class composite restorations, Gener Dent 49:489 495, 2001
  12. Hannig M, Bott B, Hohnk HD and Muhlbauer EA: A new concept for tooth colored Class II restoration with proximal margins located in dentin, J Dent Res 76:314(Abstr 2403), 1997
  13. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatlaoes P and Wilkerson M: A characterization of first generation flowable composites, JADA 129:567 577, 1998 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0274
  14. Mount GJ: Buonocore memorial lecture. Glass ionomer cements: Past, present, and future, Oper Dent 19:82 90, 1994
  15. McLean JW, Powis DR and Prosser HA: The use of glass ionomer cements in bonding composite resins to dentin, Br Dent J 158:410 414, 1985 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4805621
  16. Welbury RR and Murray JJ: A clinical trial of the glass ionomer cement composite resin 'sandwich' technique in Class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth, Quintessence Int 21:507 512. 1990
  17. Uno S, FingerWA and Ftitz U: Long term mechanical characteristics of resin modified glass ionomer restore tive materials, Dent Mater 12:64 69, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80066-2
  18. Losche AC, Losche GM and Roulet JF: The effect of prolonged water storage on marginal adaptation of Class II fillings, J Dent Res 75:394(Abstr 2232), 1996
  19. Dietrich TH., Losch AC, Losch GM and Roulet JF: Marginal adaptation of direct composite and sandwich restorations in Class II cavities with cervical margins in dentin. J Dent 27:119 128, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(98)00035-9
  20. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ and Feilzer A: The competition between the composite dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stress, J Dent Res 63: 1396 1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  21. Davidson CL and de Gee AJ: Relaxation of polymerization contraction stresses by flow in dental composites, J Dent Res 63(12): 146 148, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630021001
  22. Andersson Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW and Horstedt P: Effect of four intermediate layer treatments on microleakage of Class II composite restorations, Gen Dent 49:489 495, 2001
  23. Beznos C.: Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative tech niques. Oper Dent 26:60 69, 2001
  24. Miller M, Castellanos IR, Vargas MA and Denehy GE: Effect of restorative materials on microleakage of Class II composites, J Esthe Dent 8:107 113, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.1996.tb01003.x
  25. Abdalla AL and Davidson CL: Comparison of the marginal integrity of in vivo and in vitro Class II composite restorations, J Dent 21 :158 162, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(93)90026-M
  26. Ciamponi AL, Del Portillo Lujian VADP and Ferreira Santos JF: Effectiveness of reflective wedges on the polymerization of composite resins, Quint Intern 25:599 602, 1994
  27. Kays BT, Sneed WD and Nuckles DB: Microhardness of Class II composite resin restorations with different matrices and light positions, J Proth Dent 65:487 490, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90285-5
  28. Estafan D, Estafan A and Leinfelder KF.: Cavity wall adaptation of resin based composites lined with flow able composites, Am J Dent 13:192 4, 2000
  29. Russel RR and Mazer RB: Should flowble composites be used as liners for Class II restorations? , J Dent Res 78:389(Abstr 2266), 1999
  30. Shortall A and Asmussen E: Influence of dentin bonding agents and a glass ionomer base on the cervical marginal seal of class II composite restorations, Scand J Dent Res 96:590 594, 1988
  31. Tjan AHL and Dunn JR: Microleakage at gingival dentin margins of class V composite restorations lined with light cured glass ionomer cements, JADA 121:706 710, 1990 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1990.0270
  32. Friel KH, Schmalz and Hiller KA: Marginal adaptation of composite restorations versus hybrid ionomer/composite sandwich restorations, Oper Dent 22:21 29, 1997
  33. Sidhu S and Henderson L: In vitro marginal leakage of cervical composite restorations lined with a light cured glass ionomer, Oper Dent 17:7 12, 1992
  34. Andersson Wenckert IE, van Dijken JW and Horstedt P.: Modified Class II open sandwich restorations: evaluation of interfacial adaptation and influence of different restorative techniques, Eur J Oral Sci 110:270 275, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0447.2002.11210.x
  35. Dietrich T, Kraemer M, Losche GM, Wernecke KD and Roulet JF.: Influence of dentin conditioning and contamination on the marginal integrity of sandwich Class II restorations, Oper Dent 25:401 410, 2000
  36. Dietschi D, Bindi G, Krejci I and Davidson C: Marginal and internal adaptation of stratified compomer composite Class II restorations, Oper Dent 27:500 509, 2002

피인용 문헌

  1. Effect of pre-heating on some physical properties of composite resin vol.34, pp.1, 2009, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2009.34.1.030