Korean Journal of Materials Research (한국재료학회지)

Materials Research Society of Korea (한국재료학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Structural Changes during Oxidation Process of Anisotopic Mesophase Carbon fibers(I) - TEM and XRD Study

산화반응에 의한 이방성 메조페이스 탄소섬유의 구조 변화(I) - TEM 및 XRD를 이용한 분석

  • Roh, J.S. (School of Advanced Materials and Systems Engineering, Kumoh National University of Technology)
  • 노재승 (금오공과대학교 신소재시스템공학부)
  • Published : 2003.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Structural changes during oxidation of anisotopic mesophase carbon fiber(AMCFs) have been observed with TEM and XRD. It was shown that the AMCFs are three dimensionally stacked structure of turbostratic layers, and are non-homogeneous structure which consist of the highly ordered areas and the random areas. The $d_{ 002}$, Lc, and La of AMCFs which were measured by XRD were 3.44, 146, and $135\AA$, respectively. It was observed that the oxidation initiated at the random areas, because the $d_{002}$ / decreased to the value of 3.41 $\AA$ during initial oxidation stage. It was also observed that the La of the oxidized AMCFs increased up to 182 $\AA$ during the whole oxidation process, and the $d_{002}$ of that increases up to 9.44 $\AA$ when the burn-off is over the degree of 20%. Therefore, it was suggested that the micro-crystalline grew up by heat treatment effects during the fibers were oxidized, In addition, it was shown that there was difference in the measured value of La by XRD and TEM, in case of 39% oxidized fibers for example, the measured La was $ 165\AA$ by XRD and in the range of 180∼220 $\AA$ by TEM.

Keywords

References

  1. J.B. Donnet and R.C. Bansal, Carbon Fibers 2nd ed., 8, Marcel Decker, inc. (1990)
  2. M. Endo, C. Kim, T. Kasai, M.J. Mathews, S.D.M. Brown, M.S. Dresslhaus, T. Tamaki and Y. Nishimura, Carbon, 36, 1633 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(98)00157-2
  3. S.H. Hong, Y. Korai and I. Mochida, Carbon, 38, 805 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00175-X
  4. M.A. Montes-Moran, R.J. young, Carbon, 40, 845 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(01)00212-3
  5. H. Marsh and Francisco Rodriguez Reinoso, Science of Carbon Materials, 8, Universidad de Alicante, Alfredo Candela (2000)
  6. J.B. Donnet and R.C. Bansal, Carbon Fibers 2nd ed., 8, Marcel Decker, inc. (1990)
  7. J.B. Donnet and R.C. Bansal, Carbon Fibers 2nd ed., 128, Marcel Decker, inc. (1990)
  8. A. Sharma, T. Kyotani and A. Tomita, Carbon, 38, 1977 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00045-2
  9. V.V. Kovalevski, P.R. Buseck, and J.M. Cowley, Carbon, 39, 243 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(00)00120-2
  10. O. Senneca, P. Salatino and S. Masi, Fuel, 77, 1483 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(98)00056-8
  11. R.M. Busyin, J.N. Souzaud and J.V. Ross, Carbon, 33, 679 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(94)00155-S
  12. J.S. Roh, Korean J. Materials Research, in press (2003)
  13. J.S. Roh, Korean J. Materials Research, in press (2003)
  14. J.S. Roh and D.S. Suhr, Korean J. Materials Research, 7, 121 (1997)
  15. J. Biscoe, B.E. Warren, Journal of Applied Physics, 13, 364 (1942) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1714879
  16. S. Lu, C. Blanco, and B. Rand, Carbon, 40, 2109 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(02)00060-X
  17. S.H. Hong, Y. Korai and I. Mochida, Carbon, 34, 86 (1996)
  18. M.G. Dobb, H. Guo, D.J. Johnson and C.R. Park, Carbon, 38, 1553 (1995) https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(95)00114-S
  19. X. Bourrat, Carbon, 31, 287 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6223(93)90034-8