Hydrogen Production Using Membrane Reactors

  • Giuseppe Barbieri (Research Institute on the Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, c/o University of Calabria) ;
  • Paola Bernardo (Research Institute on the Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, c/o University of Calabria, Department of Chemical Engineering and of Materials, University of Calabria) ;
  • Enrico Drioli (Research Institute on the Membrane Technology, ITM-CNR, c/o University of Calabria, Department of Chemical Engineering and of Materials, University of Calabria) ;
  • Lee, Dong-Wook (Membrane and Separation Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Sea, Bong-Kuk (Membrane and Separation Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology) ;
  • Lee, Kew-Ho (Membrane and Separation Research Center, Korea Research Institute of Chemical Technology)
  • Published : 2003.12.01

Abstract

Methane steam reforming (MSR) reaction for hydrogen production was studied in a membrane reactor (MR) using two tubular membranes, one Pd-based and one of porous alumina. A higher methane conversion than the thermodynamic equilibrium for a traditional reactor (TR) was achieved using MRs. The experimental temperature range was 350-500$^{\circ}C$; no sweep-gas was employed during reaction tests to avoid its back-permeation through the membrane and the steam/methane molar feed ratio (m) varied in the range 3.5-5.9. The best results (the difference between the MR conversion and the thermodynamic equilibrium was of about 7%) were achieved with the alumina membrane, working with the highest steam/methane ratio and at 450$^{\circ}C$. Silica membranes prepared at KRICT laboratories were characterized with permeation tests on single gases (N$_2$, H$_2$ and CH$_4$). These membranes are suited for H$_2$ separation at high temperature.

Keywords

References

  1. S. P. Kaldis, G. C. Kapantaidakis, and G. P. Sakellaropoulos, Journal of Membrane Science, 173, 61 (2000)
  2. J. R. Rostrup-Nielsen, in: Anderson, J. R. Boudart, M. (Eds.), Catalytic steam reforming, Catalysis Science and Technology, vol. 5, Springer, New York, 1984, p. 1
  3. J. S. Oklany, K. Hou, and R. Hughes, Applied Catalysis A, 170, 13 (1998)
  4. F. M. Dautzenberg and M. Mukherjee, Chemical Engineering Science, 56, 251(2001)
  5. J. Galuszka, R. N. Pandey, and S. Ahmed, Catalysis Today, 46, 83 (1998)
  6. G. Marigliano, G. Barbieri, and E. Drioli, Chemical Engineering and Processing, 42, 231-236 (2003)
  7. M. Chai, M. Machida, K. Eguchi, and H. Arai, Applied Catalysis A, 110, 239 (1994)
  8. T. T. Tsotsis, A. M. Champagnie, S. P. Vasileiadis, Z. D. Ziaka, and R. G. Minet, Separation Science and Technology, 28, 397 (1993)
  9. B-K. Sea and K-H. Lee, Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 7, 417(2001)
  10. J. van de Graaf, F. Kapteijn, and J. A. Moulijn, Journal of Membrane Science, 144, 87 (1998)