Fabrication and Test of a Superconducting Coil for SMES

SMES용 초전도코일 제작 및 특성

  • Published : 2003.11.01

Abstract

To develop a stable and compact small-sized superconducting magnetic energy storage (SMES) system, which provides electric power with high quality to sensitive electric loads, we fabricated a SMES coil and tested it. Because such a large-sized superconducting coil quenches far away from its critical current, the recovery current is frequently used as a stability criterion in the coil fabrication. Therefore, we first investigated the recovery current characteristics of the large current conductor, which was used in our SMES coil fabrication. The test results indicate that the recovery currents measured in the conductor are nearly identical to those based on the single wire. This implies that the recovery current is affected by the conductor's cooling condition rather than its size and current capacity. In the SMES coil test the first quench occurred at 1250 A, which is equivalent to the stored energy of about 2 MJ. It corresponds to the quench current density of about $130A/mm^2$ This value is much higher in comparison with that reported in the other work. In addition, the first quench current of the coil agrees well with the measured recovery current of the conductor having similar cooling condition with it. This means that to determine the recovery current of a conductor is, first of all, important in the design and fabrication of a large-sized superconducting coil.

Keywords

References

  1. M. N. Wilson, Superconducting Magnets, Oxford University, New York, 1983, pp.89-90
  2. K. Ryu, H. J. Kim, K. C. Seong, J. W. Cho, Y. K. Kwon, K. S. Ryu, and B. J. Choi, 'Stability and quench test results of the kA class conductor for a SNES coil,' IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 828-831, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1109/77.828359
  3. K. Ryu, H. J. Kim, K. C. Seong, J. W. Cho, S. W. Kim, Y. K. Kwon, K. S. Ryu, 'Recovery current characteristics of a kA class conductor for a superconducting magnetic energy storage device,' presented at the 2001 Int. Conf. Magnet Technology, Geneva, Switzerland
  4. H.J. Kim, K.C. Seong, J.W. Cho, S.W. Kim, Y.K. Kwon, K.S. Ryu, K. Ryu, 'Fabrication and Test of the Model Coil for a SMES', IEEE Trans. on Appli. Superconductivity, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp.770-773, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2002.1018515
  5. Y. Iwasa and M. W. Sinclair, 'Protection of large superconducting magnets: maximum permissible undetected quench voltage,' Cryogenics, vol. 20, pp. 711, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0011-2275(80)90025-9
  6. Lawrence Dresner, Stability of Superconductor, New York and London: Plenum Press, 1995, pp.56-62
  7. V. E. Keilin, V. P. Agalakov, O. P. Anashkin, N. N. Britousov, A. V. Durarev, A. V. Krivykh, A. S. Kulikov, V. V. Lysenko, S. M. Miklyaev, S. A. Shevchenkp, and M. I. Surin, 'Development and test results of a double 0.5 MJ coil SMES system,' IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2312-2315, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1109/20.508629