Journal of Chest Surgery

The Korean Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (대한심장혈관흉부외과학회)
권호 표지

Middle and Long Term Results of 34 Cases of Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

응급 관상동맥 우회술 34예의 중장기 성적

  • 손정환 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김응중 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 지현근 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 신윤철 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 김건일 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 최광민 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이원진 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실) ;
  • 이원용 (한림대학교 의과대학 흉부외과학교실)
  • Published : 2003.10.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery bypass graf t (CABG) has been settled as most safe surgery among the open heart surgeries. However, in patients with cardiogenic shock, the emergency CABG has higher mortality than elective CABG. We analyzed thirty four patients who underwent emergency CABG and report the middle and long-term results. Material and Method: From June 1994 to December 2001, 34 patients who underwent emergency CABG at Kang-dong Sacred Heart Hospital were include in this study. On the basis of hospital databases and Out Patient Department (OPD) follow up data, preoperative diagnosis, risk factor, coronary artery anatomy, operation technique, postoperative mortality, complication, recurrence of symptom, and mid and long term mortality were analyzed retrospectively. Result: Indications for emergency CABG were 29 cardiogenic shocks (85.3%), 4 intractable chest pains (11.8%), and 1 polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (2.9%). Preoperative angiographic diagnoses were triple vessel disease in 16 (47.1%) and left main disease in 8 (23.5%) patients. We used saphenous vein grafts in 81 and left internal thoracic artery grafts in 14 anastomosis. The mean number of grafts per patients was 2.8$\pm$0.8. The mean aortic cross clamp time was 91.9$\pm$34.6 minutes and the mean cardiopulmonary bypass time was 262.7$\pm$198.3 minutes. Early mortality was 50% and the most common cause of early mortality was low cardiac output in 7 (20.6%) patients. The mean follow-up period was 30.9$\pm$35.7 months. There were no recurrences of symptom and late mortality. Conclusion: In the case of emergency operation, aggressive and proper management with drugs and IABP should be done for preoperative hemodynamic stability and early surgical intervention is the most important factor for patient salvage.

배경: 관상동맥 우회술은 가장 안전하게 시행할 수 있는 심장수술로 자리를 잡아왔다. 하지만 심한 관상동맥 질환으로 인한 심인성 쇼크 시 시행하는 응급 관상동맥 우회술은 선택적 수술에 비해 높은 사망률을 보인다. 본 연구에서는 응급 관상동맥 우회술을 시행받은 34명의 중장기 성적에 관하여 알아보았다. 대상 뜻 방법: 1994년 6월부터 2001년 12월까지 한림대학교 강동성심병원에서 시행한 34예의 응급 관상동맥 우회술을 대상으로 하였다. 병록과 외래추적 조사를 토대로 수술전 진단과 위험인자, 수술 전 관상동맥 조영술 소견, 수술방법, 수술 사망률, 수술 합병증, 수술후 증상의 재발과 치료, 만기 사망에 대해 후향적으로 분석하였다. 결과: 응급 관상동맥 우회술의 적응증으로는 심인성 쇼크가 29예(85.3%), 내과적 치료에 반응하지 않는 흉통이 4예(11.8%), 다형성 심실빈맥이 1예(2.9%)였다. 술 전 관상동맥 조영술상 삼혈관 질환이 16예(47.1%)였고, 좌주관상동맥 질환이 8예(23.5%)였다. 수술시 대복재 정맥 81문합, 좌측 내흉 동맥 14문합을 시행하였고, 환자당 평균 문합수는 2.8$\pm$0.8개였다. 평균 대동맥 차단 시간은 평균 91.9$\pm$34.6분이었고, 평균 심폐기 가동 시간은 262.7$\pm$198.3분이었다. 조기 사망률은 50%였고, 가장 많은 사망원인은 수술 후 저심박출증(7예, 20.6%)이었다. 평균 추적조사 기간은 30.9$\pm$35.7개월이었고, 추적조사 기간 중 증상의 재발이나 만기사망률을 보인 환자는 없었다. 결론: 응급 수술의 경우 신속한 조치로 혈역학적 안정을 확보함과 동시에 심장에 비가역적인 손상이 오기 전에 적극적인 수술적 치료를 시행하여야 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Circulation v.53 Effects of vasodilator therapy for severe pump failure in acute myocardial infarction on short term and late prognosis Chatterjee,K.;Swan,H.J.C.;Kanshik,V.S. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.53.5.797
  2. Am J Med v.58 Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in patients in cardiogenic shock, medically refractory left ventricular failure, and/or recurrent ventricular tachycardia Willerson,J.T.;Curry,G.C.;Watson,J.T.(et al.) https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(75)90568-9
  3. Circulation v.72 no.suppl Ⅱ Intermediateterm results of coronary artery bypass grafting for acute myocardial infarction Kirklin,J.K.;Blackstone,E.H.;Zorn,G.L.Jr.(et al.)
  4. Circulation v.68 no.suppl Ⅱ Acute myocardial infarction: Decade of experience with surgical reperfusion in 701 patients Dewood,M.A.;Spores,J.;Berg,R.Jr.(et al.)
  5. Br Heart J v.41 Arterial counterpulsation in severe refractory heart failure complicating acute myocardial infarction O'Rourke,M.F.;Sammel,N.;Chang,V.P. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.41.3.308
  6. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.30 Clinical experience with intra-aortic pump (IABP) in cardiac surgery Ok,C.S.;Chee,H.K.;Lee,W.Y.;Kim,E.J.;Hong,K.W.
  7. Am J Cardiol v.53 no.suppl Emergency coronary bypass surgery after coronary angioplasty: The National heart, lung, and blood institute's percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty registry experience Cowley,M.J.;Dorros,G.;Kelsey,S.F.;Randen,M.V.;Detre,K.M. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90740-9
  8. Ann Thorac Surg v.40 Coronary artery bypass following percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty Killen,D.A.;Hamaker,W.R.;Reed,W.A. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-4975(10)60005-7
  9. Ann Thorac Surg v.51 Emergency aortocoronary bypass after failed angioplasty Greene,M.A.;Gray,L.A.;Slater,A.D.;Ganzel,B.L.;Mavroudis,C. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(91)90781-K
  10. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg v.86 Emergency coronary artery reperfusion: a choice therapy for evolving myocardial infarction. Results in 339 patients Phillips,S.J.;Kongtahworn,C.;Skinner,J.R.;Zeff,R.H.
  11. Circulation v.79 no.suppl Ⅰ Emergency cardiac procedures in patients in cardiogenic shock due to complications of coronary artery disease Bolooki,H.
  12. Am Heart J v.93 Clinical and hemodynamic results of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation and surgery for cardiogenic shock Bardet,J.;Masquet,C.;Kahn,J.C.(et al.) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-8703(77)80245-7
  13. Curr Prob Cardiol v.8 Pathophysiology and management of cardiogenic shock Dole,W.P.;O'Rourke,R.A.
  14. Circulation v.46 Clinical and hemodynamic results of intraaortic balloon pumping and surgery for cardiogenic shock Dunkman,W.B.;Leinbach,R.C.;Buckley,M.J.;Mundth,E.D.;Kantrowitz,A.R.;Austen,W.G.;Sanders,C.A. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.46.3.465
  15. Circulation v.74 no.suppl Ⅲ Surgical treatment of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction Laks,H.;Rosenkranz,E.;Buckberg,G.D.