Estimation of Quantitative Source Contribution of VOCs in Seoul Area

서울지역에서의 VOCs 오염원 기여도 추정에 관한 연구

  • 봉춘근 (경희대학교 산업협력기술연구원/환경연구센터) ;
  • 윤중섭 (서울시 보건환경연구원) ;
  • 황인조 (경희대학교 환경응용화학대학/환경연구센터) ;
  • 김창녕 (경희대학교 기계ㆍ산업시스템공학부) ;
  • 김동술 (경희대학교 환경응용화학대학/환경연구센터)
  • Published : 2003.08.01

Abstract

A field study was conducted during the summer time of 2002 to determine compositions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) emitted from vehicles and to develop source emission profiles that is applied to CMB model to estimate the source contribution of certain area. Source emission profile is widely used for the estimation of source contribution by the chemical mass balance model and have to be developed applicable for the target area of estimation. This study was aimed to develop source emission profile and estimation of source contribution of VOCs after application of the chemical mass balance (CMB) receptor model. After considering the emission inventory and other research results for the VOCs in Seoul, Korea, the sources like vehicle emission (tunnel), gas station (gasoline, diesel), solvent usage (painting operation, dry cleaning, graphic art), and gas fuels were selected for the major VOCs sources. Furthermore, ambient air samples were simultaneously collected from 09:00 to 11:00 for four days at eight different official air quality monitoring sites as receptors in Seoul during summer of 2001. Source samples were collected by canisters, and then about seventy volatile organic compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC/FID). Based on both the developed source profiles and the database of the receptors, CMB model was intensively applied to estimate mass contribution of VOCs sources. Examining the source profile from the vehicle, the portion of alkanes of VOCs was highest, and then the portion of aromatics such toluene, m/p-xylene were followed. In case of gas fuel. they have their own components; the content of butane, propane, ethane was higher than any other component according to the fuel usage. The average of the source apportionment on VOCs for 8 sites showed that the major sources were vehicle emission and gas fuels. The vehicle emission source was revealed as having the highest contribution with an average of 49.6%, and followed by solvent with 21.3%, gas fuel with 16.1%, gasoline with 13.1%.

Keywords

References

  1. 한국대기환경학회지 v.16 no.5 수용모델을 이용한 청주시 미세입자(PM2.5)의 기여도 추정 강병욱;이학성;김희강
  2. 한국대기환경학회지 v.17 no.2 수원지역 대기 중 PM-10 오염원의 정량평가를 위한 수용방법론의 개발 김관수;황인조;김동술
  3. 한국대기환경학회지 v.17 no.3 휘발성유기화합물의 주요 배출원의 배출물질 구성비에 관한 연구:오존 생성 전구물질을 중심으로 김소영;한진석;김희강
  4. 한국대기환경학회 2001년 추계학술대회논문집 VOCs의 발생원별 관리방안에 관한 연구 김윤신;황순용;전준민;안진호;장기석
  5. 연세대학교 박사학위 논문 Characteristic of atmospheric volatile organic compound in Seoul:measurement and chemical mass balance receptor modeling 나광삼
  6. 조선대학교 박사학위논문 광주지역 대기 중 휘발성유기화합물의 농도 및 배출원 특성에 관한 연구 이영재
  7. 한국대기환경학회 1994년 추계학술대회논문집 Receptor modeling 이학성
  8. 환경백서 환경부
  9. 환경통계연감 환경부
  10. Atmospheric Environment v.23 no.5 Winter-time source-reconciliation of ambient organics Aronian,P.F.;P.A.Scheff;R.A.Wadden https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-6981(89)90295-3
  11. Atmospheric Environment v.30 no.1 Receptor modeling of VOCs,CO,NOx and THC in Taipei Chan,C.C.;C.K.Nien https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00261-V
  12. Atmospheric Environment v.30 no.18 Development of ozone-precusor relationships using VOC receptor modeling Chung,J.;R.A.Wadden;P.A.Scheff https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(96)00015-5
  13. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. v.49 Source profile for nonmethane organic compounds in the atmosphere of Cairo,Egypt Dosky,P.V.;Y.Fukui;M.Sultan;A.A.Maghraby;A.Taher https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1999.10463850
  14. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. v.42 Source fingeprints for volatile non-methane hydrocarbons Doskey,P.V.;J.A.Porter;P.A.Scheff https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1992.10467090
  15. Atmospheric Environment v.26A The sources and behavior of tropospheric anthropogenic volatile hydrocarbons Field,R.;M.Goldstone;J.N.Lester;R.Perry
  16. Atmospheric Environment v.29 no.21 Receptor model and emissions inventory source apportionments of nonmethane organic gases in California's San Joaquin Valley and San Francisco bay area Fujita,E.M.;J.G.Watson;J.C.Chow;K.L.Magliano https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00122-F
  17. Atmospheric Environment v.30 no.12 Apportionment of VOC Tailpipe vs Nontailpipe Emissions in the Fort McHenry and Tuscarora Mountain Tunnels Gertler,AW.;E.M.Fujita;W.R.Pierson;D.N.Wittorff https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00090-9
  18. Environ. Sci. & Technol. v.22 no.10 Receptor models Gordon,G.E. https://doi.org/10.1021/es00175a002
  19. Korea Petroleum Association A study on the Source Emission Estimate and Reduction Strategies Han,H.J.;S.G.Choi;S.W.Kim
  20. Receptor Modeling in Environmental Chemistry Hopke,P.K.
  21. Atmospheric Environment v.30 no.20 Source attribution of ambient air toxic and other VOCs in Columbus, Ohio Mukund,R.;T.J.Kelly;C.W.Spicer https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00487-4
  22. Journal of Korean Society for Atmospheric Environment v.16 no.E-2 The Composition of Non-methane Hydrocarbons Determined from a Tunnel of Seoul During Winter 2000 Na,K.S.;Y.P.Kim
  23. Environ. Sci. Technol. v.34 no.9 Source apportionment of wintertime gas-phase and particle-phase air pollutants using organic compounds as tracers Schauer,J.J;G.R.Cass https://doi.org/10.1021/es981312t
  24. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. v.46 Receptor model evaluation of the Southeast Michigan ozone study ambient NMOC measurements Scheff,P.A.;R.A.Wadden;D.M.Kenski;J.Chung https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1996.10467540
  25. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc. v.49 Determination of source contribution to ambient volatile organic compound concentrations in Berlin Thijsse,T.R.;R.F.van Oss;P.Lenschow https://doi.org/10.1080/10473289.1999.10463974
  26. Center for Environmental Research Information Office of Research and Development,Cincinnati,OH 45268 Compendium method TO-14A, Determination of Volatile Organic Compounds(VOCs) in Ambient Air Using Specially Prepared Canisters with Subsequent Analysis by Gas Chromatography US EPA
  27. Atmospheric Environment v.34 no.24 Hydrocarbon source apportionment in Mexico City using the chemical mass balance receptor model Vega,E.;V.Mugica;R.Carmona;E.Valencia https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00496-3
  28. Atmospheric Environment v.35 no.9 Review of volatile organic compound source apportionment by chemical mass balance Watson,J.G.;J.C.Chow;E.M.Fujita https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00461-1
  29. CMB8 Applications and Validation Protocol for PM2.5 and VOCs, Desert Research Institute(Document NO.1808.2D1) Watson,J.G.;N.F.Robinsin;E.M.Fujita;J.C.Chow;T.G.Pace;C.Lewis;T.Coulter
  30. Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model(Version 8(CMB8) User's Manual, Desert Research Institute,1808.1D1.) Watson,J.G.;N.F.Robinsin;C.Lewis;T.Coulter
  31. 12th World Clran Air&Environment Congress and Exhibition(IUAPPA 2001) Source identification and quantification of VOCs in Seoul metropolition area during the winter time Hwang,I.J.;C.K.Bong;J.S.Yun;D.S.Kim