DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MICROTENSILE BONDING OF RESIN FIBER REINFORCED POST TO RADICULAR DENTIN USING RESIN CEMENT

레진 시멘트를 이용한 레진 파이버 강화 레진포스트의 치근 상아질에 대한 미세인장결합강도

  • Kim, Jin-Woo (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Yu, Mi-Kyung (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Se-Joon (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 김진우 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구실) ;
  • 유미경 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구실) ;
  • 이세준 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구실) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 치과대학 보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구실)
  • Published : 2003.01.01

Abstract

Object The purpose of this study were to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of resin fiber reinforced post to radicular dentin using resin cement according to various dentin surface treatment and to observe the inter face between post and root dentin under SEM Material and Method A total 16 extracted human single rooted teeth were used. A lingual access was made using a #245 carbide bur in a high-speed handpiece with copious air water spray. The post space was mechanically enlarged using H-file(up to #60) and Gates Glidden bures(#3). This was followed by refining of the canal space using the calbrating drill set provided in ER Dentinpost(GEBR, BRASSELER GmbH&Co. KG). The 16 teeth were randomly distributed into 4 group of 4 teeth. Group 1 teeth had their post space prepared using 10% phosphoric acid as root canal surface treatment agent during 20s. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point. Group 2 teeth had their post space prepared using 3% NaOCl as root canal surface treatment agent during 30min. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point. Group 3 teeth had their post space prepared using 17% EDTA as root canal surface treatment agent during 1min. The canal was then rinsed with saline and dried with paper point. Group 4 teeth had their post space prepared using 17% EDTA as root canal surface treatment agent during 1min. After rinsing with saline, the canal was rinced 10m1 of 3% NaOCl for 30min. After drying with paper point, the post(ER Dentinpost, GEBR, BRASSELER GmbH&Co. KG) was placed in the treated canals using resin cement. Once the canal was filled with resin cement(Super bond C&B sunmedical co. Ltd.), a lentulo was inserted to the depth of the canal to ensure proper coating of the root canal wall. After 24 hours, acrylic resin blocks($10{\cdot}10{\cdot}50mm$) were made. The resin block was serially sectioned vertically into stick of $1{\cdot}1mm$. Twenty sticks were prepared from each group. After that, tensile bond strengths for each stick was measured with Microtensile Tester. Failure pattern of the specimen at the interface between post and dentin were observed under SEM. Results 1. Tensile bond strengths(meen{\pm}SD$) ) were expressed with ascending order as follows group 4, $12.52{\pm}6.60$ ; group 1, $7.63{\pm}5.83$ ; group 2, $4.13{\pm}2.31$ ; group 3, $3.31{\pm}1.44$. 2. Tensile bond strengths of Group 4 treated with 17% EDTA +3%NaOCl were significant higher than those of group 1, 2 and 3 (p<0.05). 3. Tensile bond strengths of Group 1 treated with 10% phosphoric acid were significant higher than those of group 2 (p<0.05). Tensile bond strengths of Group 4 treated with 17% EDTA +3% NaOCl was significant higher than those of other groups.

Keywords

References

  1. Aryuro Martinez-Insua, MD, Luis Da Silva, MD, Bentio Rilo, MD and Urbano Santana, MD. Cornparision of the fracture resistance of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998:80:527-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(98)70027-7
  2. Erick Asmussen, Anne Peutzfeldt, Thomas Heitmann. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J.Dent. 1999;7:275-278
  3. Platt JA. Resin-based luting cements. Compend Cantin Educ Dent. 2000 :21:740-2
  4. Semra Calt DDS, PHD, and Ahmet Serper, DDS, PhD. Time-Dependent effects of EDTA on dentin structures J. Endo . 2002:28: 17-19 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200201000-00004
  5. John W. Harrison, DMD, MS and Ronald E. Hand. DMD, MS. The effect of dulution and orgnic matter on the antibacterial of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. J Endo 1981:7:128-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80127-6
  6. Morris MD, Lee KW, Agee KA, Bouillaguet S, Pashley DH. Effects of sodium hypochlorite and RC-prep on bond strengths of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endo. 2001:27:753-7 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200112000-00010
  7. Gaston BA, West LA, Liewehr FR, Fernandes C, Pashley DH. Evaluation of regional bond strength of resin cement to endodontic surfaces. J Endo. 2001:27:321-4 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200105000-00001
  8. Pashley DH, Carvalho RM, Sano H, Nakajima M, Yoshiyama M, Shono Y, Fernandes CA, Tay F : The microtensilebondtest :a review, J. Adhes. Dent. 1999;1:299- 309
  9. Snao H.Dhono T,Sonoda H, Takatsu T,Ciucchi B, Carvalho R,Pashley DH(1994c). Relation between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength Evaluation of a microtensile bond test. Dent Mater 1984;10:236-240 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90067-1
  10. Pashey DH, Sarno H, Ciucchi B, Yoshiyama M, Carvalho RM. Adhesion testing of dentin bonding agents: A Review, Dent. Mater. 1995:11:117-125 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80046-8
  11. Chappell R, Schreiner R, Glaros A, Eixk J. Pilot study to determine sample size for micro-tensile testing, J. Dent. Res. 1997;76:38
  12. Zheng L, Pereira PN, Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength, Oper. Dent. 2001:26:97-104
  13. Samsri S, Van Noort R : Do dentin bond strength tests serve a useful purpose?, J. Adhes. Dent.1999: 1: 57-67
  14. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, Cardew G : A critique of bond strength measurements, J. Dent. 1989: 17:61-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(89)90131-0
  15. Marco Ferrari, Alessandro Vichi, Simone Grandini. Efficacy of different adhesive techniques on onding to root canal walls: an SEM investigation. Dent Mater 2001;17:422-429 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00102-0
  16. T.W. Chow, MSc, DBS, LDS, RCS. Mechanical effectivenss of root canal irrigation. J Endo 1983:9:475-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(83)80162-9
  17. Miriam F. Zaccaro Scelza, DDS, MDS, PhD, Joao Humberto Antoniazzi. DDS, MDS, PhD and Pantaleo Scelza, DDS. Efficacy of final irrigation-a scanning electron microscopic evaluationcccc.J Endo 1981;7:128-32 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(81)80127-6
  18. Walter T, Cumninggharn. B.A., D.D.S.,M.A., and Aram Y .Balekjian, B.A., M.S. Effect of temperature on collagen-dissolving ability of sodium hypochlorite endodontic irrigant. Oral Surg. 1981;49:175-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(80)90313-8
  19. Niu W, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. A scanning electron microscopic study of dentinal erosion by final irrigation with EDTA and NaOCI solutions. Int Endo J. 2002 ;35:934-9 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2002.00594.x
  20. Villegas JC, Yoshioka T, Kobayashi C, Suda H. Obturation of accessory canals after four different final irrigation regimes. J Endo. 2002;28:534-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00012
  21. Serper A, Calt S. The demineralizing effects of EDTA at different concentrations and pH. J Endo. 2002;28:501-2 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004770-200207000-00002
  22. Y.Kitasako, M.F.Burrow, T.Tnikaido, J.Tagami. Longterm tensile bond durability of two different 4-MATA containing resin cement to dentin. Dent Mater 1992;18:276-280 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00049-5
  23. M.Goldman, R. Devitre, R.white, and D Nathanson. An SEM study of post cemented with an unfilled resin. J Dent Res 1984;63:1003-5 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630070101
  24. Chang JC, Hurst TL, Hart DA, Estey AW. 4-META use in dentistry: a literature review. J Prasthet Dent. 2002;87:216-24 https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.121584
  25. Semra Calt DDS, PHD, and Ahmet Serper,DDS,PhD. Smear layer removal by EGTA. J Endo 2002;26:459-61
  26. Mak YF, Lai SC, Cheung GS, Chan AW, Tay FR, Pashley DH. Micro-tensile bond testing of resin cements to dentin and an indirect resin composite. Dent Mater. 2002;18:609-21 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00005-2
  27. Vichi A, Grandini S, Davidson CL, Ferrari M. An SEM evaluation of several adhesive systems used for bonding fiber posts under clinical conditions. Dent Mater. 2002;18:495-502 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00065-3

Cited by

  1. Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements vol.33, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499
  2. Influence of post types and sizes on fracture resistance in the immature tooth model vol.35, pp.4, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.4.257
  3. Comparison of push-out bond strength of post according to cement application methods vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.479