HOW TO DEFINE CLEAN VEHICLES\ulcorner ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT RATING OF VEHICLES

  • Mierlo, J.-Van (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ETEC-tw-VUB) ;
  • Vereecken, L. (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ETEC-tw-VUB) ;
  • Maggetto, G. (Vrije Universiteit Brussel, ETEC-tw-VUB) ;
  • Favrel, V. (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, CEESE-ULB) ;
  • Meyer, S. (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, CEESE-ULB) ;
  • Hecq, W. (Universite Libre de Bruxelles, CEESE-ULB)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

How to compare the environmental damage caused by vehicles with different foe]s and drive trains\ulcorner This paper describes a methodology to assess the environmental impact of vehicles, using different approaches, and evaluating their benefits and limitations. Rating systems are analysed as tools to compare the environmental impact of vehicles, allowing decision makers to dedicate their financial and non-financial policies and support measures in function of the ecological damage. The paper is based on the "Clean Vehicles" research project, commissioned by the Brussels Capital Region via the BIM-IBGE (Brussels Institute for the Conservation of the Environment) (Van Mierlo et at., 2001). The VriJe Universiteit Brussel (ETEC) and the universite Libre do Bruxelles (CEESE) have jointly carried out the workprogramme. The most important results of this project are illustrated in this paper. First an overview of environmental, economical and technical characteristics of the different alternative fuels and drive trains is given. Afterward the basic principles to identify the environmental impact of cars are described. An outline of the considered emissions and their environmental impact leads to the definition of the calculation method, named Ecoscore. A rather simple and pragmatic approach would be stating that all alternative fuelled vehicles (LPG, CNG, EV, HEV, etc.) can be considered as ′clean′. Another basic approach is considering as ′clean′ all vehicles satisfying a stringent omission regulation like EURO IV or EEV. Such approaches however don′t tell anything about the real environmental damage of the vehicles. In the paper we describe "how should the environmental impact of vehicles be defined\ulcorner", including parameters affecting the emissions of vehicles and their influence on human beings and on the environment and "how could it be defined \ulcorner", taking into account the availability of accurate and reliable data. We take into account different damages (acid rain, photochemical air pollution, global warming. noise, etc.) and their impacts on several receptors like human beings (e.g., cancer, respiratory diseases, etc), ecosystems, or buildings. The presented methodology is based on a kind of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) in which the contribution of all emissions to a certain damage are considered (e.g. using Exposure-Response damage function). The emissions will include oil extraction, transportation refinery, electricity production, distribution, (Well-to-Wheel approach), as well as the emission due to the production, use and dismantling of the vehicle (Cradle-to-Grave approach). The different damages will be normalized to be able to make a comparison. Hence a reference value (determined by the reference vehicle chosen) will be defined as a target value (the normalized value will thus measure a kind of Distance to Target). The contribution of the different normalized damages to a single value "Ecoscore" will be based on a panel weighting method. Some examples of the calculation of the Ecoscore for different alternative fuels and drive trains will be calculated as an illustration of the methodology.

Keywords

References

  1. Auto-Umweltlistem (1999/2000), VCD, Bonn
  2. DeCicco, J., Thomas, M. and Kliesch, J. (2000).ACEEE's Green Book, Washington
  3. Favrel, V., Pons, T., $\dotMar{e}chal$, K., Claeys, P., Ferdinand,C., et Hecq, W. (2001). $\dotMoblit{e}$ durable en $\dotr{e}gion$bruxelloise: Analyse des impacts sur I'environnement-Evaluation des extemalites physiques et monetaires,Rapport Final, Contrat de Recherche SSTC MDDD012, Centre dEtudes Economiques et Sociales de I'Environnement, Universite Libre de Bruxdles, Aout 2001, 68+ Annexes
  4. GoedkooP, M. (1996). The Eco-Indicator 95, Weightingmethod for environmental effects that damage eco-systems or human health on a European scale, Final Report, PRe Consultants, 86
  5. Goedkoop, M. and R. Spriensma (2000). The EcoIndicator 99, A damage oriented method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment, Methodology Report, PRe Consultants, April 2000, Second Edition, 103 + Annexes
  6. Govaerts, L. (2001). Emissielabelling nieuwe personenwagens, VITO, Report AMINAL Project
  7. Joumard, R. (1999). Methods of estimation of atmospheric emissions from transport: European scientist network and scientific state-of-the-art. Final Report, LTE 9901 Report, Action COST 319, Institut National de Recherche sur les Transports et leur Secuhte(INRETS), France
  8. Keller, M. and de Haan, P. (1998). Intermodal comparisons of atmospheric pollutant emissions, MEETProject, Deliverable no24, EC Contract No. ST-96-SC.204, INFRAS, Beme, Switzerland
  9. UTOPIA Project (2001). Cleaner Vehicles in Cities,European Commission
  10. Van Mierlo, J., FavreI, V., Meyer, S., Vereecken, L. et al.(2001). Schone Voertuigen (Clean Vehicles), FinalReport, VUB-ETEC, ULB-CEESE
  11. Weber, T. (2001). Well-to-Wheel Energy Consumptionand Greenhouse Gas Emissions - A North AmericanAnalysis, General Motors, Brussel