Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지

The Explicit Treatment of Model Uncertainties in the Presence of Aleatory and Epistemic Parameter Uncertainties in Risk and Reliability Analysis

  • Published : 2003.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the risk and reliability analysis of complex technological systems, the primary concern of formal uncertainty analysis is to understand why uncertainties arise, and to evaluate how they impact the results of the analysis. In recent times, many of the uncertainty analyses have focused on parameters of the risk and reliability analysis models, whose values are uncertain in an aleatory or an epistemic way. As the field of parametric uncertainty analysis matures, however, more attention is being paid to the explicit treatment of uncertainties that are addressed in the predictive model itself as well as the accuracy of the predictive model. The essential steps for evaluating impacts of these model uncertainties in the presence of parameter uncertainties are to determine rigorously various sources of uncertainties to be addressed in an underlying model itself and in turn model parameters, based on our state-of-knowledge and relevant evidence. Answering clearly the question of how to characterize and treat explicitly the forgoing different sources of uncertainty is particularly important for practical aspects such as risk and reliability optimization of systems as well as more transparent risk information and decision-making under various uncertainties. The main purpose of this paper is to provide practical guidance for quantitatively treating various model uncertainties that would often be encountered in the risk and reliability modeling process of complex technological systems.

Keywords

References

  1. F.O. Hoffman and J.S. Hammonds, 'Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessments: The Need to Distinguish Between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty Due to Variability, Risk Analysis, 14(5), pp.707-712(1993) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00281.x
  2. J.C. Helton, 'Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems,' Risk Analysis, 14, pp.483-511(1994) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1994.tb00266.x
  3. E. Hofer, 'When to separate uncertainties and when not to separate,' Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54, pp.113-118(1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00068-3
  4. J.C. Helton and D.E. Burmaster, Guest Editors, Treatment of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty,' Special Issue of Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54(2-3)(1996)
  5. G. E. Apostolakis, 'The Distinction between Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainties is Important: An Example from the Inclusion of Aging Effects into PSA, Proceedings of PSA 99, Washington DC, August 22-26 (1999)
  6. S. Apeland, T.Aven, and T. Nilsen, ' Quantifying Uncertainty under a Predictive, Epistemic Approach to Risk Analysis,' Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 74. pp. 93-102(2002) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00122-3
  7. N. Siu and G. Apostolakis, 'On the Quantification of Modeling Uncertainties,' $8^{th}$ Intl. Conf. On Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, Brussels, Belgium, August 19-23, Vol.M2, Paper 1/5, pp.375-378(1985).
  8. A. Patwardhan and M.J. Small, 'Bayesian Methods for Model Uncertainty Analysis with Application to Future Sea Level Rise,' Risk Analysis, 12(4), pp.513-523(1992) https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1992.tb00708.x
  9. G. E. Apostolakis, 'A Commentary on Model Uncertainty,' In Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification, NUREG/CP-0138, (eds A. Mosleh et al.), USNRC(1994)
  10. K.B. Laskey, 'Implications of Model Uncertainty for the Practice of Risk Assemssment,' In Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification, NUREG/CP-0138, (eds A. Mosleh et al.), USNRC(1994)
  11. K.I. Ahn and H. Jin, 'A Formal Approach for Quantitative Treatment of Modeling Uncertainties in Safety Analysis, Nuclear Technology, 116(2),pp. 146-159(1996) https://doi.org/10.13182/NT96-A35296
  12. M.E. Pate-Cornell, 'Uncertainties in Risk Analysis: Six levels of treatment,' Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54, pp.95-111(1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00067-1
  13. K.I. Ahn and H.D. Kim, 'A Formal Procedure for probabilistic Quantification of Modelling Uncertainties Employed in Phenomenological Transient Models,' Nuclear Technology, 130, pp.132-144(2000) https://doi.org/10.13182/NT00-A3082
  14. J.K. Knudsen and C.L. Smith,' Estimation of System Failure Probability Uncertainty Including Model Success Criteria,' CD-Rom Proceeding of PSAM 6, San Juan, Puerto Rico, June 24-28(2002)
  15. R.L. Winkler, 'Uncertainty in Probabilistic Risk Assessment,' Reliability Engineering and System Safety,' 54, pp. 127-132(1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(96)00070-1
  16. B.De Finetti, Theory of Probability, Vols 1 and 2, Wiley, New York(1974)
  17. G. Apostolakis, 'The Concept of probability in Safety Assessments of Technological Systems,' Science, 250, pp. 1359-1364(1990) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.2255906
  18. S. Kaplan, 'On a Two-Stage Bayesian Procedure for Determining Failure Rates from Experimental Data,' IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems, PSA102, pp. 195-202(1983)
  19. Model Uncertainty: Its Characterization and Quantification, NUREG/CP-0138, (eds A. Mosleh et al.), USNRC(1994)
  20. C.J.Lee and K. Y. Sung, 'An Uncertainty Analysis for the Plant-specific Reliability Data Application,' Proc. of the Korean Nuclear Society Autumn meeting, Yongpyong, Korea(october 2002).
  21. T. Ishigami, E. Cazzoli, M. Khatib-Rahbar, and S.D.Unwin, 'Techniques to Quantify the Sensitivity of Deterministic Model Uncertainties,' Nuclear Science and Engineering, 101, pp.371-383(1989) https://doi.org/10.13182/NSE89-A23625