Effect of Pelvic Tilting Exercise and Gait Training on Gait Characteristics of the Patients with Hemiplegia

골반경사 운동과 보행훈련이 편마비 환자의 보행특성에 미치는 영향

  • Kwak Kil-Hwan (Major in Physical Therapy, Department of Rehabilitation Science, Graduate School, Daegu University) ;
  • Lee Dong-Wook (Department of Physical Therapy, Masan Sam Sung Hospital Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Bae Sung-soo (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Science, Daegu University)
  • 곽길환 (대구대학교 재활과학대학원 재활과학과 물리치료) ;
  • 이동욱 (성균관 대학교 마산삼성병원 물리치료실) ;
  • 배성수 (대구대학교 재활과학대학 물리치료학과)
  • Published : 2003.09.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of the pelvic tilting exercise, pelvic tilting exercises with floor walking training, pelvic tilting exercises with treadmill walking training on quantitative gait function in patients with hemiplegia. Thirty patients with hemiplegia due to cerebrovascular disease participated in this study. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of pelvic tilting exercise group, pelvic tilting exercise with floor walking training group and pelvic tilting exercises with treadmill walking training group. The effects of each therapeutic method were evaluated by measurements of gait velocity, cadence, stride length, step length, base of support and foot angle using ink-foot prints. Data were analyzed statistically using paired t-test and one-way ANOVA. The results of this research are as followings : 1. After treatment, it turned out that pelvic tilting exercises with treadmill walking training has the most effect on gait velocity, cadence, stride length, step length and foot angle, which has significant difference in statistics (p<0.05). 2. Quantification of the gait velocity, cadence, both stride length and step length demonstrated a significant increase (p<0.05) after treatment in all groups when compared with values measured before treatment. The base of support and foot angle in affected side decreased significantly (p<0.05) after treatment in all groups when compared with values measured before treatment. 3. The lumbosacral angle noted a significant increase (p<0.05) after treatment in all groups, however, an ANOVA analysis did not reveal any differences between groups.

Keywords