Outcome of LINAC Radiosurgery for a Cavernous Angioma

해면상혈관종에 대한 선형가속기를 이용한 고선량 정위 방사선수술의 임상경험

  • Hong Semie (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chie Eui Kyu (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park Suk Won (Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim Il Han (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ha Sung Hwan (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park Charn Il (Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • 홍세미 (서울대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 지의규 (서울대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 박석원 (한림대학교 의과대학 방사선종양학교실) ;
  • 김일한 (서울대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 하성환 (서울대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과학교실) ;
  • 박찬일 (서울대학교 의과대학 치료방사선과학교실)
  • Published : 2003.06.01

Abstract

Purpose: To establish the role of stereoactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator for the treatment of patients with cavernous angloma. Materials and Methods: Between February 1995 and May 1997, 11 patients with cavernous angioma were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery using a linear accelerator. Diagnoses were based on the magnetic resonance imaging in 8 patients, and the histological in 3. The vascular lesions were located on the brainstem (5 cases), cerebellum (2 cases) thalamus (1 case) and cerebrum (3 cases). The clinical presentation at onset included previous intracerebral hemorrhages (9 cases) and seizures (2 cases). All patients were treated with a a linac-based radiosurgery. The median dose of radiation delivered was 16 Gy ranging from 14 to 24 Gy, which was typically proscribed to the 80$\%$ isodose surface (range 50 $\~$ 80$\%$), corresponding to the periphery of the lesion with a single isocenter. Ten patients were followed-up. Results: The median follow-up was 49 months ranging from 8 to 73 months, during which time two patients developed an intracerebral hemorrhage, 1 at 8 months, with the other at 64 months post radiosurgery. One patient developed neurological deficit after radiosurgery, and two developed an edema on the T2 weighted images of the MRI surrounding the radiosurgical target. Conclusion: The use of stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of a cavernous angioma may be effective in the prevention of rebleedlng, and can be safely delivered. However, a longer follow-up period will be required.

목적: 혈관조영상 잠재혈관기형 중 하나인 해면상혈관종의 치료에 있어 선형가속기를 이용한 정위방사선수술의 역할을 알아보고자 한다. 대상 및 방법: 1995년 2월부터 1997년 5월까지 서울대학교병원에서 해면상혈관종으로 11명이 방사선수술을 받았다. 진단은 자기공명영상을 바탕으로 내려진 것이 8예였으며 3예에서는 조직학적으로 진단이 되었다. 병변의 위치는 대뇌부 3예, 시상부 1예, 뇌간 5예, 소뇌 2예였으며 진단 당시의 임상증상은 뇌내출혈로 인한 신경학적 결손을 보인 환자가 9예였으며 2예에서는 경련을 나타내었다 선형가속기를 이용한 정위방사선수술의 선량의 중앙값은 회전중심점 선량의 80$\%$를 기준으로 16 Gy (범위: 14$\~$24 Gy)였다. 11명의 환자 중 10예에서 추적관찰이 가능하였다. 결과: 49개월의 중앙추적관찰기간 동안(범위: 8$\~$73개월) 2예의 재출혈이 발생하였다. 1예는 정위방사선수술 시행 8개월 후에 재출혈이 일어났으며 1예는 정위방사선수술 64개월 이후에 재출혈이 발생하였다. 정위방사선수술 후에 1예는 출혈의 증거 없이 신경학적으로 악화되었고 2예는 임상증상을 동반하지 않은 채 T2 강조 자기공명영상에서 높은 신호강도가 나타났다. 결론: 해면상혈관종에 대한 정위방사선수술은 재출혈 방지에 효과가 있는 것으로 생각되며 그 부작용 또한 크지 않았으나 재출혈에 대해서는 충분한 기간 추적관찰을 하여야 할 것으로 생각한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Tomlinson FH, Houser O, Scheithauser B, et al. Angiographically occult vascular malformations. A correlative study offeaturesonmagneticresonance imaging and histological examination. Neurosurgery 1994;34:792-800 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199405000-00002
  2. LobatoRD,PerezC,RivasJJ,etal. Clinical,radiological, andpathologicalspectrum of angiographically occult vascular malformations. Analysis of 21 cases and review of literature. J Neurosurg 1998;68:518-531
  3. Kondziolka D, Lunsford D, Kestle J, et al. the natural history of cerebral cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 1995;83:820-824 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0820
  4. Simard JM, Bengochea-Garcia F, Ballinger W, et al. Cavernous angioma. A review of 126 collected and 12 new clinical cases. Neurosurgery 1986;18:162-172 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-198602000-00008
  5. Dillon WP. Cryptic vascularmalformation: Controversies in terminology, diagnosis, pathophysiology and treatment. AJNR 1997;18:1839-1846
  6. Tew JM Jr, Lewis AI, Reichert K, et al. Management strategies and surgical techniques for deep-seated supratentorial arteriovenous malformation. Neurosurgery 1995; 36:1065-1072 https://doi.org/10.1227/00006123-199506000-00001
  7. Kondziolka D, Lunsford D, Flickinger J, Kestle JRW. Reduction of hemorrhage risk after stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 1995;83:825-831 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0825
  8. Suh TS, Suh DY, Park CI, et al. Development of 3-D radiosurgery planning system using IBM personal computer. J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 1993;11:167-174
  9. Sebag-MontefioreDJ,Doughty D,BiggsD,Plowman PN. Stereotactic multiple arc radiotherapy. I. Vascular malformations of the brain: an analysis of the first 108 patients. Br J Neurosurg 1995;9:441-452 https://doi.org/10.1080/02688699550041070
  10. Del Curling O Jr, Kelly D Jr, Elster A, Craven TE. An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas. J Neurosurg 1991;75:702-708 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0702
  11. Robinson JR, Awad IA, Little JR. Natural history of the cavernous angioma. J Neurosurg 1991;75:709-714 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1991.75.5.0709
  12. TsienC,SouhamiL,SadikotA,etal. Stereotactic radiosurgery in the management of angiographically occult vascular malformations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001; 50:133-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01568-6
  13. LiscakR,VladykaV,SimonavaG,VymazalJ,NovotnyJJr. Gamma knife radiosurgery of the brain stem cavernoma. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2000;43:201-207 https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2000-11378
  14. Kim DY, Ahn YC, Lee JI, et al. Clinical experience of LINAC-based stereotactic radiosurgery for angiographically occult vascular malformations J Korean Soc Ther Radiol Oncol 2001;19:1-9
  15. Weil S,TewJM,SteinerL. Comparison of radiosurgery and microsurgery for cavernous malformationof the brainstem. J Neurosurg 1990;72:336
  16. Karlsson B, KihlstromL,LindquistC,EricksonK,SteinerL. Radiosurgery for cavernous malformations. J Neurosurg 1998;88:293-297 https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1998.88.2.0293
  17. Amin-HanjaniS,OgilvyCS,CandiaGJ,LyonsS,Chapman PH. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cavernous malformation: Kjellberg's experience with proton beam therapy in 98 cases at the Harvard Cyclotron. Neurosurgery 1998;42: 1229-1238 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199806000-00013
  18. Amin-Hanjani S, Ogilvy C, Ojemann R, et al. Risks of surgical management for cavernous malformations of the nervous system. Neurosurgery 1998;42:1220-1228 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-199806000-00007