Propofol and Fentanyl Compared with Midazolam and Morphine for Conscious Sedation During Surgical Extraction of Bilateral Mandibular Impacted Third Molars

양측 하악 매복지치 동시 발치를 위한 의식하 진정의 비교 연구: Propofol, Fentanyl과 Diazepam, Morphine

  • Kim, Young-Kyun (Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Bundang Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Chae, Byung-Kook (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jesaeng General Hospital, Daejin Medical Center) ;
  • Choi, Hyun-Kyu (Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Jesaeng General Hospital, Daejin Medical Center)
  • 김영균 (분당서울대학교병원 치과 구강악안면외과) ;
  • 채병국 (분당제생병원 마취통증의학과) ;
  • 최현규 (분당제생병원 마취통증의학과)
  • Published : 2003.12.30

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the availability of propofol and fentanyl (P + F) with diazepam and morphine (D + M) for intravenous conscious sedation during third molar surgery. Methods: Forty patients without systemic disease were operated under IV conscious sedation administered by either of the two techniques. Monitoring consisted of continuous observation of pulse rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and the respiratory rate and were recorded every 15 minutes. Cooperation score was measured 5 and 15 minutes after induction of IV sedation. Following the operation, the surgeon and patients completed questionnaires including pain visual analog scale, amnesia, and side effects. Results: The P + F group was significantly more cooperative than the D + M group. The side effects of D + M group included pain on injection, nausea/vomiting and abdominal pain. The side effects of P + F group included talkativeness, nausea/vomiting, temporary apnea, pain on injection and vertigo. Conclusions: In this study, there were following benefits in the P + F group; more cooperative status and less pain perception. But respiratory depression developed in some patients.

Keywords