The relation of Leisure participation motivation, Activity, Self efficacy and Subjective well-being

여가활동, 여가동기, 자기효능감 및 주관적 안녕감간의 관계

  • Received : 2002.10.15
  • Published : 2002.11.30

Abstract

This study was attempted in order to understand leisure phenomenon in Korea cultural area through relation of Leisure Activity, Leisure participation motivation, self -efficacy and Subjective well-being. The purpose of this study was to investigate the question that Leisure Phenomenon was studied focus on specific Leisure activity contents such as physical, tour science, though it is an important subject to explore as psychological and cultural. Also it suggested that what was the problem of established studies and what was the directions for future study. Concrete study problem was assumed three issues. (1)General state of leisure activity and leisure motivation in Korea, (2)The correlated relation between each motivation and self-efficacy and (3)The correlated relation between each motivation and Subjective well-being?. Through this, we conducted three results. Frist, the leisure motivation scale was factor analyzed and consequently 2 factors which can be considered as leisure motivation were prescribed. Also through the responded data, leisure activity of university students showed much more passive activity(e.g.,reading, listening music, movie, watching TV, Internet surfing etc.) than positive and physically activity. Second, each motivation was not significant in self-efficacy. Finally, among the motivation, especially emotion and psychological rest motivation was significant in the subjective wellbeing. These findings imply that general understanding about leisure phenomenon can different as the cultural thinking of leisure activity and leisure motivation.

본 연구는 지금까지 여가현상 규명의 영역이 체육학이나 관광학등에 편향되어왔음을 지적함과 동시에 여가 활동, 여가참여동기, 자기효능감 및 주관적 안녕감간의 관계를 통해 한국문화권에서의 여가 현상을 이해해보기 위해 수행된 것이다. 구체적인 연구문제로 1) 한국의 여가동기와 여가활동의 양상, 2)각 여가동기와 자기효능감간의 상관관계 그리고 3)각 여가동기와 주관적 안녕감간의 상관관계를 설정하였고, 대학생 270명을 통해 연구결과가 크게 3가지로 나타남을 확인할 수 있었다. 첫째, 여가동기는 자기개발 및 자기향상동기와 정서 및 심리적 안정추구동기로 나누어지며, 전반적인 여가활동은 소위 정적이며 소극적이라고 불리어지는 활동들이 나타났고 둘째, 분류된 두 동기에 따른 개개인의 자기효능감간에는 유의미한 관계가 나타나지 않았으며 셋째, 정서 및 심리적 안정추구동기로 여가를 경험한 개인이 자기개발 및 자기향상동기로 여가를 경험한 개인보다 주관적 안녕감과 유의미한 관계가 있었다. 위와 같은 연구결과들은 여가활동과 여가동기에 대한 문화적 인식에 따라 여가현상에 대한 이해 및 인식이 달라질 수 있음을 시사해준다. 마지막으로 본 연구의 함의, 제한점과 향후 연구 방향을 논의하였다.

Keywords