IE interfaces (산업공학)

Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers (대한산업공학회)
권호 표지

Design of Structural Models for Constructing a Goal Alternatives Disposition System in Large-Scale R&D Projectsr

대규모 R&D 프로젝트에 있어서 목표대체안 처리시스템의 구축을 위한 구조모형의 설계

  • Kwon, Cheol-Shin (School of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • Cho, Keun-Tae (School of Systems Management Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 권철신 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부) ;
  • 조근태 (성균관대학교 시스템경영공학부)
  • Received : 20020400
  • Accepted : 20020700
  • Published : 2002.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to design a Goal Alternatives Disposition System having three main subsystems for setting, evaluating and selecting goal alternatives. For setting of goal alternatives, System Alternatives Tree(SAT) structure will be developed, which has a computation algorithm for setting decision alternatives by the concept of System Priority Number(SPN). For evaluating and selecting of goal alternatives; First, Normative and Exploratory Priority Indices which consider technical performance to the goal, cost and feasibility are developed respectively. Second, Integrated Priority Index is built up to determine the total priority of the Goal Alternatives Disposition(GAD) system. For the design and verification of the GAD system, technological forecasting structure theory, systems engineering methodology will be used.

Keywords

References

  1. Goodwin, P. G. (1972), A Method for Evaluation of System alternate Designs, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 19(1), Feb
  2. Jantsch, E. (1968), Technological Forecasting in Perspective, OECD
  3. Kwon, C.S. (1982), Construction of RDPPUSAFE based on the Quantification of Feasibility Function, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 8[2]
  4. Kwon, C.S. (1982), Optimal Strategic Solution for Evaluation and Selection of R&D System Alternatives, SKKU
  5. Kwon, C.S. (2000), R&D Management Theory, Development Engineering Society
  6. Kwon, C.S., Hong, S.W. (1990), Construction of an Estimates Aggregation Model for Designing Feasibility Estimate System of R&D Project, The Korean Operations Research and Management Society,15(1)
  7. Malchow, H. I. and Croopnick, S. R (1985), A Methodology for Organizing Performance Requirements for Complex Dynamic Systems, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-32(1), Feb.
  8. Nakamura, S. (1987), Problem Solving, Development Publication Company
  9. North, Q. H. and Pyke, I. D.(1969), 'Probes' of The Technological Future, Havard Business Review; May-June
  10. Roberts, E. B.(1969), Explolatory and Normative Technological Forecasting: A Critical Appraisal, Appendix B in technological forecasting(By Cerron, M. J., Gordon and Breach, Science Publishers)
  11. Schoman, C. H., et al. (1969), Relating Organization Goals and Techno logical Forecasting For Research and Development Resource Allocation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-16(4), Nov
  12. Sigford, J. V. and Parvin, R H (1965), Project PATTERN - A Methodology for Determining Relevance in Complex Decision-Making, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-12(1), Mar
  13. White, D. R J. et al. (1963), POED-A Method of Evaluating System Performance, IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, EM-10(4),Dec
  14. Yamada, K.(1972), Systems Analysis on R&D Goal Setting, Tokyo Institute of Technology