피트에서 추출한 부식산 표면에 대한 카드뮴과 구리의 경쟁 흡착

Competitive Adsorption of Cd and Cu on Surface of Humic Acid Extracted from Peat

  • 임수길 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 정창윤 (캔사스주립대학교 농학과) ;
  • 옥용식 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부) ;
  • 김정규 (고려대학교 환경생태공학부)
  • Lim, Soo-Kil (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Chung, Chang-Yoon (Department of Agronomy, Kansas state University) ;
  • Ok, Yong-Sik (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Jeong-Gyu (Division of Environmental Science & Ecological Engineering, Korea University)
  • 투고 : 2002.09.09
  • 심사 : 2002.10.14
  • 발행 : 2002.12.30

초록

부식산(humic acid)은 토양 환경내에서 중금속의 용액내 이온종(chemical speciation) 분포 및 이동성(transport)에 커다란 영향을 미친다. 부식산에 대한 카드뮴과 구리의 경쟁흡착을 파악하기 위하여, 상이한 농도의 배경 전해질 조건에서 피트에서 추출한 부식산의 전하발현 양상을 조사하고, 수소이온흡착모델을 통하여 부식산 표변에서의 양성자결합 상수(proton binding constant) 금속이온 흡착모델의 기본상수로 하여 부식산 표면에 대한 카드뮴, 구리흡착과 두 이온의 경쟁흡착을 해석하고자 하였다. 구리는 카드뮴에 비하여 카르복실기에 더 강한 흡착력이 있음을 보여 주었으며 페놀성 수산기에 대한 흡착력은 카드뮴에 비하여 약함을 보여 주었다. 여러 금속이온이 복합적으로 존재하는 환경에서 이온 간의 경쟁을 고려하였을 때 단일 이온만이 존재할 경우를 대상으로 구한 상수를 직접 적용시켜 경쟁효과를 예측하는 데는 어려움이 있음을 알 수 있었지만, 금속이온 각각을 통해 얻은 상수값은 부식산의 표면에 흡착할 수 있는 금속이온의 양을 제시 할 수 있으므로 금속이온간의 상대적인 흡착능의 비교는 가능하다고 생각된다.

Chemical speciation and transport of heavy metals in soil environment could be controlled by humic acid. In order to understand the mechanism on competitive adsorption of Cd and Cu on the surface of humic acid extracted from peat, the charge development of humic acid were investigate through a batch adsorption experiment with a series of different background electrolytes levels. The competitive adsorption of Cd and Cu to the humic acid were estimated according to the model using the proton binding constant obtained from the above batch test. The affinity of Cu to the carboxyl group on the humic acid was higher than that of Cd, but the affinity to the phenolic group was lower than to the carboxyl group. It seems that the amount of adsorbed Cd and Cu could be estimated using the proton binding constant obtained from a solution with single background ion. However, it is difficult to interpret the competitive adsorption of Cd and Cu with the constant for single background ion.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Christensen, J. B., E. Tipping. D. G. Kinniburgh. C. Gron. and T. Christensen. 1998. Proton binding by groundwater fulvic acids of different age, ohgins, and structure modeled with the Model V and NICA-Donnan Model. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:3346-3355 https://doi.org/10.1021/es971134o
  2. Jeong, C. Y. 1998. Modelling metal competition for adsorption sites on humic acid. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham, U.K
  3. Jeong. C. Y., Y. S. Ok. J. G. Kim, and S. K. Lim, 1999. Effect of electrolyte concentration on charge development and cadmium adsorption on humic surface, Proceeding of the Symposium 'Remediation Technology' : The Korean Soc. of Environ. Agric
  4. Kinniburgh. D. G., Milne, C. J.. Benedetti. M. F..Pinheiro, J. P., Filius. J.. Koopal, L. K. and Van Riemsdijk, W. H. 1996. Metal ion binding by humic acid : Application of the NICA-Donnan Model. Environmental Science and Technology, 30 : 1687-1698 https://doi.org/10.1021/es950695h
  5. Lee, J. J.. S. M. Chang. and J. Choi. 1995 Mechanism of Humic Acid-Heavy Metal Complexation, J. Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 28(2): 114-122
  6. Marinsky, J.A.M.M. Reddy.J.H. Epheaim, and A.S. Mathuthu. 1995. Computational scheme for theprediction of metal in binding by a soil fulvic acid.Analytica Chimica Acta, 302:309-322 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(94)00491-4
  7. Oades, J. M. 1989. An introduction to organic matter in mineral soils. p89~159. In J.B. Dixon and S. B.Weed(ed.) Manerals in soil environments. SSSA Book Ser. 1. 2nd ed. SSSA, Madison. WI. USA
  8. Park, H. 1990. Present and prospect of peat research. J, Korean Soc. Soil Sci. and Fert. 23(4) : 302-309
  9. Schnitzter, M., and S. U. Khan. 1978. Soil Organic Matter. Elsevier, New York
  10. Schnizter, M., and S. I. M. Skinner. 1968. Alkali versus acid extraction of soil organic matter. Soil Sci. 105:392-396 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-196806000-00003
  11. Tan, K. H. 1978. Variations in soil humic compounds as related to regional and analytical differences. Soil Sci, 125:351-358 https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197806000-00003
  12. Tipping, E. and Hurley, M. A. 1992. A unifying model of cation binding by humic substances. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 56, 3627-3641 https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(92)90158-F
  13. Van Riemsdijk, W. H. and Koopal, L. K. 1992. lonbinding by natural heterogeneous colloids. In Buffle. J. and Van Leeuwen. H. P. (Ed.). Environmental Particles. Vol. 1. Lewis Publishers. Boca Raton
  14. Yang, J. E., Y. K. Shin, and J. J. Kim, 1993,Application of principle in Metal-Ligand Complexation to Remove Heavy Metals: Effects of Metal Concentration, pH and Temperature, J Korean Soc. Soil Sci. Fert. 26(1): 37-42
  15. Yang, J. E,. Y. K. Shin, and J. J. Kim, 1993 Application of principle in Metal-Ligand Complexation to Remove Heavy Metals: Time Effects, Korean J. Environ. Agric. 12(1): 51-57
  16. Yang, J. E., Y. K. Shin, J. J, Kim, J. Park, 1992.Application of principle in Metal-Ligand Complexation to Remove Heavy Metals: Kind and Concentration Effects of Organic Ligands, Korean J Environ. Agric. 11(3): 243-252