COMPARATIVE ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF MASTICATORY MUSCLES BETWEEN BILATERAL AND UNILATERAL MASTICATORS

  • Na Sun-Hye (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kang Dong-Wan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • Published : 2002.12.01

Abstract

There are several variations in normal mastication. In them, unilateral mastication is chewing, predominantly on a preferred side of the dentition and hardly on e non-preferred side. Continual unilateral mastication may alter the coordination of masticatory muscles. Although they studied about these EMG of masticatory muscles, there were no information about characteristics of masticatory muscle activity in unilateral mastication. Therefore, In this study, we investigated the activity of the masseter and anterior temporal muscles during rest, clenching in maximum intercuspation and gum chewing in habitually unilateral mastication group compared with normal group and tried to know effects of continual unilateral mastication on activity of masticatory muscles. The results of this study were as follows 1. In electromyographic activity during rest, in bilateral mastication group pattern of muscle activity of right and left side was symmetrical. But, in unilateral mastication group, records of anterior part of temporal muscle was higher than that of bilateral mastication group (p<.01) and patterns of muscle activity of right and left side in both muscle were asymmetrical.(p<.05) 2. In electromyographic activity during clenching in maximum intercuspation, records of superficial part of masseter muscle were higher than anterior part of temporal muscle in both group. Muscle activity of temporal muscle in unilateral mastication group was a little higher han bilateral mastication group and asymmetry of activity pattern in temporal and masseter muscle was shown but these differences were not statistically significant. (p<.05) 3. In electromyographic activity during gum chewing, temporal muscle was activated earlier than masseter muscle and maximum bite force is derived from masseter muscle in both group. In unilateral mastication group, electromyographic activity of masseter and temporal muscle of preferred chewing side, regardless of right or left side chewing, was higher than that of bilateral mastication group and especially, difference in masseter muscle was statistically significant. (p<.01) Based on the above results, our study suggested that recording of masticatory muscle activity will be helpful in the effective diagnosis and treatment of some types of the parafunctional habits.

Keywords

References

  1. Benito Rilo, Jose Luis da Silva, Francisco Gude, Urbano Sahara. 'Myoelectric activity during unilateral chewing in healthy subjects: Cycle duration and order of muscle activation' J Prosthet Dent. 80:462-466,1998
  2. G. Zhang, X. Huang. SW. 'Effect of unilateral bite splint on mastication in the miniature pig' J Oral Rehabil. 21:613-622, 1994
  3. C. Hagberg. 'The amplitude distribution of electromyographic activity of masticatory muscles during unilateral chewing' J Oral Rehabil. 13:567-574,1986
  4. H. Abekura, H. Kotani, H. Tokuyama, T. Hamada. 'Asymmetry of masticatory muscle activity during intercuspal maximal clenching in healthy subjects and subjects with stomatognathic dysfunction syndrome' J Oral Rehabil. 22:699-704, 1995
  5. Khalid M. Balkhi. 'Activity of anterior temporalis and masseter muscles during deliberate unilateral mastication' J Orofacial Pain 7:89-97, 1993
  6. D. Bevilaqua-Grosso, V. Monteiro-Pedro, RR. De Jesus Guirro, F. Berzin 'A physiotherapeutic approach to craniomandibular disorder: a case report' J Oral Rehabil. 29:268-273, 2002
  7. K. Nishigawa, M. Nakano, E. Bando. 'Study of jaw movement and masticatory muscle activity during unilateral chewing with and without balancing side molar contacts' J Oral Rehabil. 24:691-696, 1997
  8. C. Hagberg. 'The amplitude distribution of elcetromyographic activity in painful masseter muscles during unilateral chewing' J Oral Rehabil. 14:531-540, 1987
  9. Ambra Michenlotti, Mauro Farella, stefano Vollaro, Roberto Martina. 'Mandibular rest position and electrical activity of the mastication' J Prosthet Dent. 78(1):48-53, 1997
  10. B. Rilo, U. Santana, MJ. Mora, CM. Cadarso. 'Myoelectrical activity of clinical rest position and jaw muscle activity in young adults' J Oral Rehabil 24:735-740, 1997
  11. Uc. Belser, AG. Hannam. 'The contribution of the deep fibers of the masseter muscle to selected tooth- clenching and chewing tasks' J Prosthet. Dent. 56(5):629-635, 1986
  12. Ramfjord, SP., Ash, MM., 'Functional disturbances of temporomandibular joints and muscles' Occlusion. 62-160, 1986
  13. Moritani, T., De vries, HA. 'Neural factors versus hypertrophy in the time course of muscle strength gain' Am J Physical Med. 58:115-121, 1979
  14. VF. Ferrario, C. Sforza, G. Serrao. 'The influence of crossbite on the coordinated electromyographic activity of human masticatory muscles during mastication' J Oral Rehabil. 26:575-581 1999
  15. RS. McCarroll, M. Naeije, YK. Kim, TL. Hansson. 'The immediate effect of splint-induced changes in jaw positioning on the asymmetry of submaximal masticatory muscle activity' J Oral Rehabil. 16:163-170, 1989
  16. David M. Hickman, Richard Cramer, Morgantown. W. Va., Hershey Pa. 'The effect of different condylar positions on masticatory muscle electromyographic activity in human' Oral Surg. Oral Med. Oral Path. 85(1):18-23, 1998
  17. T. M. G. J. Van Eijden, NG. Blanksma, P. Brugman 'Amplitude and timing of EMG activity in the human masseter muscle during selected motor tasks J Dent Res. 72(3):599-606, 1993
  18. Buxbaum, JD., Parente, FJ., Ramsey, WO., Staling, LM. 'A comparison of centric relation with maximum intercuspation based on quantitative electromyography' J Oral Rehabil. 9:45-55, 1982
  19. Jimenze. ID. 'Dental stability and maximal masticatory muscle activity' J Oral Rehabil. 14:591-595, 1987
  20. Andreson, DJ. 'A methods of recording masticatory load' J Dent Res. 32:785-789, 1953