The Journal of Korean Academy of Prosthodontics (대한치과보철학회지)

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지

THE STRESS ANALYSIS OF SUPPORTING TISSUE AND IMPLANT ACCORDING TO CROWN RESTORATIVE MATERIALS AND TYPE OF IMPLANT

수복재료와 임플랜트 종류에 따른 임플랜트 및 지지조직의 응력분포

  • Choi Chang-Hwan (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh Jong-Suk (Department of Microbiology, College of Medicine, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Vang Mong-Sook (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Chonnam National University)
  • 최창환 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실) ;
  • 오종석 (전남대학교 의과대학 미생물학교실) ;
  • 방몽숙 (전남대학교 치과대학 보철학교실)
  • Published : 2002.02.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was aimed to analyze the stress distribution of implant and supporting tissue in single tooth implant restoration using Branemark $system^{(R)}$(Nobel Biocare, Gothenberg, Sweden) and Bicon system(Bicon Dental Implants, Boston, MA). Two dimensional finite element analysis model was made at mandibular first premolar area As a crown materials porcelain, ceromer, ADA type III gold alloy were used. Tests have been performed at 25Kgf vertical load on central fossa of crown portion and at 10Kgf load with $45^{\circ}$ lateral direction on cusp inclination. The displacement and stresses of implant and supporting structures were analyzed to investigate the influence of the crown material and the type of implant systems by finite element analysis. The results were obtained as follows : 1. The type of crown material influenced the stress distribution of superstructure, but did not influence that of the supporting alveolar bone. 2. The stress distribution of ceromer and type III gold alloy and porcelain is similar. 3. Stress under lateral load was about twice higher than that of vertical load in all occlusal restorative materials. 4. In Bicon system, stress concentration is similar in supporting bone area but CerOne system generated about 1.5times eater stress more in superstructure material. 5. In Branemark models, if severe occlusal overload is loaded in superstvucture. gold screw or abutment will be fractured or loosened to buffer the occlusal overload but in Bicon models such buffering effect is not expected, so in Bicon model, load can be concentrated in alveolar bone area.

Keywords

References

  1. Bransmark PI : Osseointegration and its experimental background. J Pros-thet Dent. 1983; 50:399-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(83)80101-2
  2. Adell R. Lekholm U. Branemark PI : A 15 year study of osseointegrated edentulous jaw. J Oral Surg. 1981: 10:387
  3. Brunski JB : Biomaterials and biomechanics in dental implant design. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1988;3:85-97
  4. Skalak R : Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;49:843-848
  5. Kirsch A. Ackerman KL : The IMZ osseointegrated implant system. Dent Clin North Am. 1989;33:733-791
  6. Hobkirk JA, Parros KJ : The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992:7:345-352
  7. Atilla Sertgoz : Finite element analysis study of the effect of superstructure material on stress distribution in an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. The International J of Prosthodontics. 1997; 10:19-27
  8. Mahalick JA, Razaui R, Khan Z : Occlusal wear in prosthodontics. J Am Dent Assoc. 1971; 82:154-159 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1971.0018
  9. Berge M, Silness J : The pattern and severity of wear of resin facings in fixed prosthetic restorations in vivo. Int J Prosthodont. 1992;5:269-276
  10. Jacobi R, Shillingburg HT, Duncanson MG : A comparison of the abrasivess of six ceramic surfaces and gold. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:303-309 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90254-T
  11. Rieger MR : A finite element survey of eleven endosseous implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;63:457
  12. Lavelle CL, Wedgewood D, Love WB : Some advances in endosseous implant. J Oral Rehabil. 1981;8:319-33 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1981.tb00506.x
  13. Bernard Touati, Nadine Aidan: Second generation laboratory composite resins for indirect restorations. Journal of Esthetic dentistry. 1997;19:108-118
  14. Gibbs CH, Mahan PE : Occlusal forces during chewing and swallowing as measured by sound transmission. J Prosthet Dent. 1981;46:443-449 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(81)90455-8
  15. Craig RG : Restorative Dental Materials, 6th ed : C.V. Mosby Co 60-62, 1980
  16. Anderson DJ : Measurement of stress in mastication (I). J Dent Res 1956: 35: 664-670
  17. Anderson DJ : Measurement of stress in mastication (II). J Dent Res 1956;35:671-673 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345560350050301
  18. Craig RG, Farah JW : Stresses from loading distal- extension removable partial denures. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:274
  19. Ciftci Yalcin, Senay Canay : The effect of veneering materials on stress distribution in implant-supported fixed prosthetic restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000;15:571-581
  20. 류선열, 양홍서, 조규종,: Post 형태에 따른 치근내부와 지지조직의 응력 분산에 관한 2차원적 연구. 대한치과의사협회지. 1988;26: 737
  21. Craig GG, Peyton FA : Measurement of stresses in field bridge restortations using brittle coating technique. J Dent Res. 1965;44:756
  22. Dirtoft BI, Jansson JF, Abramson NH : Using holography for measurement ofin vivo deformation in complete maxillary denture. J Prosthet Dent. 1985;54:843
  23. Kim DW, Kim YS : A study on the osseointegrated prosthesis using three dimensional finite element method. The Journal of Korean A cademy of Prosthodontics 1991;29:167-214
  24. Yang HS, Thompson VP : A two dimensional stress analysis of fixed prosthesis with rigid or nonrigid connectors. J Dent Res 1991;70:192
  25. Papavasiliou G, Kamposiora P, Bayne SC, Felton DA : Three-dimensional finite elementanalysis of stress-distribution around single tooth implants as afunction of bony support, prosthesis type, and loading during function. J Prosthet Dent. 1996;76:633-640 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90442-4
  26. Bernt Andersson, Per Odman et al : Mechanical testing superstructure of the CraOne abutment in the Br${\aa}$nsmark System. Int J Oral MaxillofacImplants.1994;9:665-672
  27. Shepherd NJ : Affordable implant prosthetics using a screwless implant system. J of Am Dent Asso. 1998;129:1732-1738 https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1998.0143
  28. Chapman RJ, William Grippo : The Locking taper attachment for implant abutments: use and reliability. Implant Dent. 1996;5:257-261 https://doi.org/10.1097/00008505-199600540-00004
  29. Muftu A, Mulcahy HL, Chapman R. : Comparison of Streptococcus sanguis penetration through various implant connection mechanisms. J Dent Res.1997;76:87
  30. Cho LR : A review on the fiber reinforced resin ceramic optimized polymer restoration. J of the Korean Dental association. 1999;37:785-795
  31. Grunder U. Strub JR. : Implant supported superstructure design. J Perio Res.1990;10:19
  32. van Rossen IP, Braak LH, de Putter C, de Groot K : Stress absorbing elements in dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;64: 198
  33. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stochler CS : Determining the force absorption quotientfor restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;67:361-364 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90247-8
  34. Richard Skalak : Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prosteses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983;49:843-848 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(83)90361-X
  35. Stefano E. Gracis, James D. Chalupnik : Shock-Absorbing Behavior of Five Resto rative Materials Used on Implants. Int J of Prosth. 1991;4:282-291
  36. 홍성기, 조인호 : 치과임플랜트 보철시 치관재료의 차이에 따른 응력분산의 이차원 유한요소법적 연구. 대한 치과 이식학회지. 1993;13:23-35
  37. Torsten Jemt, William R. Laney: Osseointegrated implants for single tooth replacement: A 1-year report from a multicenter prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:29-36
  38. Major M Ash Jr : Wheelers Dental anatomy, physiology and occlusion: 7th ed WB Saunders Co 1993;218-231