노인 입원환자에 대한 항궤양약물 처방양상 분석

Drug Utilization Review of Antiulcerative Agents in Korean Elderly Inpatients

  • 이원식 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 이승미 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실) ;
  • 구혜원 (서울대학교병원 임상시험센터) ;
  • 박병주 (서울대학교 의과대학 예방의학교실, 서울대학교병원 임상시험센터)
  • Lee, Won-Sik (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Mi (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koo, Hye-Won (Clinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Hospital) ;
  • Park, Byung-Joo (Department of Preventive Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Clinical Trial Center, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 발행 : 2002.03.01

초록

Objectives : To review the drug prescription pattern of antiulcerative agents for elderly inpatients, Methods : The study population comprised inpatients of community hospitals who were members of the Korean Elderly Pharmacoepidemiologic Cohort (KEPEC), aged 65 years or over, beneficiaries of the Korea Medical Insurance Corporation (KMIC) and residing in Busan city in 1993. The drug prescription information was collected from the claims data of hospitals where the cohort members received medical care between January 1993 and December 1594. The information included personal identification, age, gender, diagnosis, drug dosage, date of hospital admission and name of medical institutions where the study subjects received drug prescriptions. The data analysis produced outcomes in terms of distribution of antiulcerative agents by class and by medical institution and trend of relative prescription, Analysis was also performed in terms of combined prescriptions of antiulceratives and drugs that could induce risk from drug interaction with antiulceratives. Results : The number of patients prescribed antiulcerative agents was 1,059 (64,9%) male and 1,724 (65.5%) female among the total inpatients. An antacid and composite agent was the most frequently prescribed antiulcerative agent (70.8%), followed by $H_2$ antagonist (16.0%), Among the potential drugs that could induce risk from drug interaction with the antiulcerative agents, diazepam was the most frequently prescribed. The proportion of diazepam co-prescription was 22.5% of the total cimetidine prescriptions and 14.5% of the fetal omeprazole prescriptions. Conclusions : Antiulcerative drugs were frequently prescribed in the elderly inpatients. The adverse drug reaction could possibly be due to drug interaction. The study results could be used as fundamental data for further drug utilization review of antiulceratiye agents.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Park BJ. History and methodology of pharmacoepidemiology. Korean J Clin Pharmacal Ther 1994; 2: 63-72 (Korean)
  2. Park BJ. Drug therapy and DUR, J Korean Med Assoc 1994; 37: 181-188 (Korean)
  3. Park BJ, Lee SJ. Background and current status of drug utilization review in the developed countries, Korean J Clin Pharmacal Ther 1999; 7: 3-16 (Korean)
  4. Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. Evidence-Based Medicine. A new approach to teaching the practice of medicine. JAMA 1992; 268: 2450-25 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.268.17.2450
  5. Cho YK, Park BJ, Jung KO, Koo HW, Kim DS, Bae JM. Drug utilization review of antibiotics in the geriatric inpatients in Korea. J Korean Soc Chemother 1999; 17: 11-23 (Korean)
  6. Lee KS, Kang PS. Trend of medical care utilization and medical expenditure of the elderly cohort. Korean J Prev Med 1997; 30: 437-461 (Korean)
  7. Knapp DA. Development of criteria for drug utilization review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 600-602 https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1991.189
  8. Angaran DM. Quality assurance to quality improvement: measuring and monitoring pharmaceutical care. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991; 48: 1901-1907
  9. Nadjem DM. Development of medica-tionuse indicators by the Joint Com-missionon Accreditation of Healthcare Orga-nizations. Am J Hosp Pharm 1991; 48: 1925-1930
  10. 서울대학교 의과대학 약리학교실. 약리학.고려의학; 1994
  11. Erwin WG. The definition of drug utilization review: statement of issues. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50: 596-599 https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1991.188
  12. De Neef Pet al. A system for drug utili-zationreview in ambulatory care. J Fam Practice 1991; 32: 607-612
  13. 보건복지부. 보건복지통계연보. 보건복지부; 1999
  14. Byeon JJ. Prescription of digestive system drugs to the patients with no digestive symptoms, J Korean Fam Med 1997; 18: 78-83 (Korean)
  15. IMS. IMS Monthly Midas; 1999
  16. 한국제약협회 제약산업통계집. 한국제약협회; 1996
  17. 이의경,배종면,박경호. 의약품사용평가. 한국보건사회 연구원; 1999
  18. 보건복지부. 보건통계연감. 보건복지부;2001
  19. Soli AH. Medical treatment of peptic ulcer disease; practical guideline, JAMA 1996;275:622-629 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.275.8.622
  20. Freston MS, Freston JW. Peptic ulcers in the elderly: unique features and management. Geriatrics 1990; 45: 39-45
  21. Monette J, Moun H, Bohn RL, Avron J. Concurrent use of antiulcerative agents. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997; 24: 207-213 https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199706000-00005
  22. Kumana, Cyrus R et al. Antiulcer drug prescribing in hospital successfully influenced by 'immediate concurrent feedback'. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1998; 64: 569-574 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9236(98)90141-2
  23. Ugwr L, Monane M, Sorrentino A, Elbeck M, Thammkhoune J, Kelly M. Improving medication prescribing among the elderly: result of a population-based intervention program. J Am Geriatr Soc 1998;46:62
  24. Monane M. Improving prescribing patterns for the elderly through an online drug utilization review intervention: a system linking the physician, pharmacist, and computer. JAMA 1998; 280: 1249-1252 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.280.14.1249
  25. Jones JK. A view from the drug utili9-zation review management organization sector. Clin Pharmacol Ther 1991; 50:620-625 https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.1991.195
  26. Glassman, P, Schranz, C. The effect of pharmacy benefits management on prescribing behavior and drug costs. J Gen Intern Med 1998; 13(supplement 1): 65