References
- 강석진, 신숙희, 노태희(2002a). 밀도 개념 학습에서 자기 조절 전략과 인지 갈등 및 개념 변화의 관계. 대한화학회지, 46(1), 83-89
- 강석진, 신숙희, 노태희(2002b). 변칙 사례에 대한 초등학생들의 반응 연구. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(2), 252-260
- 교육부(1999). 중학교 교육 과정 해설(III): 수학, 과학, 기술 . 가정. 서울: 대한교과서 주식회사
- 김범기, 권재술(1995). 과학개념과 인지적 갈등의 유형이 학생들의 개념변화에 미치는 영향. 한국과학교육학회지, 15(4), 472-486
- 노태희, 임희연, 강석진(2000). 변칙 사례에 대한 학생들의 반응 유형. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(2), 288-296
- 노태희, 임희연, 강석진, 김순주(2001). 학생의 인지적 . 정의적 변인, 변칙 사례에 의한 인지 갈등, 개념 변화 사이의 관계. 한국과학교육학회지, 21(4), 658-667
- 송희숙(2000). 중학생의 학습동기와 과학학습에서 인지갈등의 관계. 한국교원대학교 석사학위논문
- 이경호, 권재술(1999). 관성개념에 대하여 자기의 생각과 불일치하는 상황의 유형에 따른 학생의 반응. 한국과학교육학회지, 19(4), 516-527
- 전경문, 노태희(1997). 학생들의 과학 학습 동기 및 전략. 한국과학교육학회지, 17(4), 415-424
- Asher, S. R.(1980). Topic interest and children's reading comprehension. In R. Spiro, B. Bruce, & W. Brewer (Eds.) Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 525-534
- Chinn, C. & Brewer, W. F.(1998). The empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(6), 623-654 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199808)35:6<623::AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-O
- Dreyfus, A., Jungwirth, E., & Eliovitch, R.(1990). Applying the 'cognitive conflict' strategy for conceptual change-some implications, difficulties, and problems. Science Education, 74(5), 555-569 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730740506
- Guzzetti, B. J., Snyder, T. E., Glass, G. V., & Games, W. S.(1993). Promoting conceptual change in science: a comparative meta-analysis of instructional interventions from reading education and science education. Reading Research Quarterly, 28(2), 117-159
- Hidi, S.(1990). Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 549-571 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543060004549
- Hong, E.(1998). Differential stability of state and trait self-regulation in academic performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(3), 148-162 https://doi.org/10.1080/00220679809597536
- Jones, M. G., Howe, A., & Rua, M. J.(2000). Gender differences in students' experiences, interests, and attitudes toward science and scientists. Science Education, 84(2), 180-192 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(200003)84:2<180::AID-SCE3>3.0.CO;2-X
- Krapp, A., Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A.(1992). Interest, learning and development. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.) The role of interest in learning and development. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 3-25
- Mitchell, M.(1993). Situational interest: its multifaceted structure in the secondary mathematics classroom. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 424-436 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.424
- Naylor, F. D.(1981). A state-trait curiosity inventory. Australian Psychologist, 16(2), 172-183 https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068108255893
- Pintrich, P. R., Marx, R. W., & Boyle, R. A.(1993). Beyond cold conceptual change: the role of motivational beliefs and classroom contextual factors in the process of conceptual change. Review of Educational Research, 63(2), 167-199 https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543063002167
- Schank, R. C.(1979). Interestingness: controlling inferences. Artificial Intelligence, 12, 273-297 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(79)90009-2
- Schiefele, U., Krapp, A., & Winteler, A.(1992). Interest as a predictor of academic achievement: a meta-analysis of research. In K. A. Renninger, S. Hidi, & A. Krapp (Eds.) The role of interest in learning and development. Erlbaum: Hillsdale, 183-212
- Schraw, G. & Lehman, S.(2001). Situational interest: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 23-52 https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009004801455
- Tobias, S.(1990). They're not dumb, they're different: stalking the second tier. Research Corporation: Tucsan
- Yarlas, A. S. & Gelman, R.(1998). Learning as a predictor of situational interest. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego