Journal of The Korean Association For Science Education (한국과학교육학회지)

The Korean Association for Science Education (한국과학교육학회)
권호 표지

The Effect of Grouping by Students' Agreeableness in Cooperative Learning

협동학습에서 학생의 유화성에 따른 집단 구성의 효과

  • Published : 2002.12.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study. the effects of grouping by students' agreeableness in cooperative learning strategy applied to middle school science classes on their achievement. confidence, satisfaction, attitude toward science class, and cohesion of group members were investigated. One hundred and fifty-eight students were assigned to control group, homogeneous group and heterogeneous group, and taught about separation of mixture for 7 class hours. The results revealed that there was no significant difference in the achievement test scores. However, significant interaction between the instruction and the level of agreeableness were found in the satisfaction and the cohesion of group members. Students of higher agreeableness level in the homogeneous group were more satisfied with science class and cohesive. Students' attitude toward science class in the homogeneous group was also significantly higher than those in the other groups.

이 연구에서는 협동학습 전략을 사용한 중학교 과학 수업에서 학생들의 유화성을 고려한 소집단 구성이 학업 성취도, 과학 수업에 대한 자신감과 만족감, 과학 수업에 대한 태도, 구성원간 응집성 등에 미치는 효과를 조사하였다. 158명 학생들을 전통 집단과 동질 및 이질 집단으로 배치하고, 혼합물의 분리 단원에 대하여 7차시 동안 수업을 실시하였다. 분석 결과, 학업 성취도에서는 차이가 없었다. 그러나, 만족감과 구성원간 응집성에서 수업 처치와 유화성 수준 사이의 상호작용 효과가 나타났다. 유화성 상위 학생들은 동질 집단에서 만족감과 응집성이 높았다. 동질 집단의 학생들이 다른 집단의 학생들보다 과학 수업에 대한 태도가 높았다.

Keywords

References

  1. 노태희, 박수연, 임희준(1998). 중학교 물상 수업에서 학생 중심 활동을 강조한 협동학습과 개별학습 전략의 효과. 화학교육, 25(2), 56-64
  2. 노태희, 박수연, 임희준, 차정호(1998). 협동학습 전략에서 소집단 구성 방법의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 18(1), 61-70
  3. 노태희, 서인호, 한재영, 전경문, 차정호(2000). 협동학습에서 학생의 의사소통 불안에 따른 소집단 구성의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 20(1). 174-182
  4. 노태희, 한재영, 서인호, 전경문, 차정호(2000). 학생의 내. 외향성에 따른 협동학습의 효과. 한국과학교육학회지 20(1), 43-51
  5. 한재영, 노태희(2002). 과학 수업에서의 소집단 활동에 대한 학생들의 인식. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 499-507
  6. Barrick, M. R., Stewart, G. L., Neubert, M. J., & Mount, G. L.(1998). Relating member ability and personality to work-team process and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 377-391 https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.3.377
  7. Bowers, C. A., Pharmer, J. A., & Salas, E.(2000). When member homogeneity is needed in work team: a meta-analysis. Small Group Research. 31(3), 305-327 https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100303
  8. Chang, H. & Lederman, N. G. (1994). The effect of levels of cooperation within physical science laboratory groups on physical science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(2), 167-181 https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660310207
  9. De Raad, B. & Schouwenburg, H. C.(1996). Personality in learning and education: a review. European Journal of Personality, 10(5), 301-336 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5<301::AID-PER272>3.0.CO;2-7
  10. Fraser, B. J.(1981). Test of science-related attitudes: Handbook. Hawthorn: The Australian Council for Educational Research
  11. Goldberg, L. R.(1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models, In I. Mervielde, I. J. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.) Personality Psychology in Europe (Volume 7). Tilburg University Press: Tilburg, The Netherlands, 7-28. Available: http://ipip.ori.org
  12. Good, T. L., Mulryan, C., & McCaslin, M.(1992). Grouping for instruction in mathematics: a call for programmatic research on small-group process, In D. Grouws (Ed.) Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. Macmillan: New York, 165-196
  13. Graziano, W. G., Hair, E. C., & Finch, J. F.(1997). Competitiveness mediates the link between personality and group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1394-1480 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1394
  14. Keller, J. M.(1993). IMMS: instructional material motivation survey. Florida State University
  15. Kichuk, S. L. & Wiesner, W. H.(1997). The big five personality factors and team performance: implications for selecting successful product design teams. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14, 195-221 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(97)00010-6
  16. Millar, D. P.(1986). Introduction to small group discussion. Speech Communication Association: Annandale, Virginia
  17. Neuman, G. A., Wagner, S. H., & Christiansen, N. D.(1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 28-45 https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601199241003
  18. Shaw, M. E.(1981). Group dynamics: the psychology of small group behavior McGraw-Hill: NY, 191-261
  19. Slavin, R. E.(1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52-54
  20. Webb, N. M.(1984). Sex differences in interaction and achievement in cooperative small groups. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1). 33-44 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.76.1.33