Science Teacher Education in Taiwan

  • Published : 2002.12.30

Abstract

This article describes the status of science teacher education in Taiwan. The pre-service and in-service science teacher training system, institutes, curricula, programs, and evaluation on the institutes were briefly introduced. The differences before and after the 1996 reform of science teacher training system were compared. Finally, the attempts and efforts that have been done through the channels of research to promote science teachers' professional development were addressed. These efforts include the Case studies of exemplary science teachers' teaching performances, the development of licensure instruments for the certification of science teachers, the use of computers and distance education for supervising student teachers, the exploration of promoting science teachers' understanding about the nature of science, the exploration of promoting science teachers' pedagogical content knowledge, the exploration of promoting science teachers' ability of increasing effective student-teacher and student-student interactions, and the exploration of effective teaching strategies.

Keywords

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science(1989). Science for alI Americans. Author: Washington DC
  2. Brickhouse, N.(1990). Teachers' beliefs about the nature of science and their relation to classroom practice, Journal of teacher Education, 41(3), 53-62 https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719004100307
  3. Brooke, H., & Solomon, J.(1998). From playing to investigating: Research in an interactive science center for primary pupils, International Journal of Science Education, 20(8), 959-971 https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069980200804
  4. Brown, S. J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P.(1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. EducationaI Researcher, 18(1), 32-42 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X018001032
  5. Bruner, J. S.(1960). The process of education. Harvard University Press: Cambridge
  6. Chang, J. Y.(2001). The design of multi-situated teaching modules: An example using the topic of carbon dioxide, Chinese Journal of Science Education, 9(3), 235-252
  7. Chang, C. Y., & Cheng, C. H.(2000). A study of incorporation of creative problem solving and cooperative learning strategies into earth science instruction, Chinese Journal of Science Education, 8(3), 251-272
  8. Duschl, R.(1991). Restructuring Science Education. Teachers College Press: New York
  9. Gallagher, J. J.(1991). Prospective and practicing secondary school science teachers' knowledge and beliefs about the philosophy of science. Science Education, 75(1), 121-134 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730750111
  10. Grossman, P. L.(1988). A study in contrast: Sources of pedagogical content knowledge for secondary English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University
  11. Huann-shyang Lin, Jui-ying Hung and Su-chu Hung(2002). Using the history science to promote students' problem-solving ability, International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453- 464 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110073991
  12. Hodson, D.(1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education, 72, 19-40 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730720103
  13. Lederman, N. G., & Zeidler, D. L.(1987). Science teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: Do they really influence teacher behavior? Science Education, 71(5), 721-734 https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730710509
  14. Lederman, N. G., & Chang H. P.(1997). An international investigation of pre-service science teachers' pedagogical and subject matter knowledge structures, Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 7(2), 110-122
  15. Lin, H., & Chen, C. C.(2002). Promoting pre-service chemistry teachers' understanding about the nature of science through history, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7)
  16. Lin, H., Hung, J., & Hung, S.(2002). Using the history of science to promote students' problem- solving ability, International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 453-464 https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110073991
  17. Lin, H., Chiu, H. L., & Chou, C. Y.(In Press). Student understanding about the nature of science and their problem-solving strategies, International Journal of Science Education
  18. Lin, S. W.(1997). Continually expanding content representations: A case study of a junior high school biology teacher, Proceedings of the National Science Councit, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 7(2), 77-85
  19. Lin, S. W., & Yang, J. H.(1998). Biology teachers' knowledge base of instructional representations, Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(1), 22-32
  20. Mattews, M. R.(1994). Science teaching: The role of history and philosophy of science. Routledge: New York
  21. She, H. H.(1998). Interaction between different gender students interaction and teacher in junior high school biology classes, Proceedings of the National Science Council, Part D Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 8(1), 16-21
  22. She, H. C.(2000). The interplay of a biology teacher's beliefs, teaching practices and gender- based student-teacher classroom interaction. Educational Research, 42(1), 100-111 https://doi.org/10.1080/001318800363953
  23. Shulman, L. S.(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14 https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015001004
  24. Shulman, L. S.(1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-22 https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411
  25. Tuan, H. L.(1996). Investigating the nature and development of pre-service chemistry teachers' content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, and pedagogical content knowledge. Proceedings of the National Science Council, Republic of China, Part D: Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 6(2), 101-112