A Study on the Affecting Factors and Performance of IS Organizational Innovation - Use of the IS Development Methodology as an Object of Innovation -

IS 조직혁신의 영향요인과 성과에 관한 연구 - IS 개발방법론을 혁신 대상으로 -

  • Published : 2002.09.30

Abstract

This research focuses on the IS development methodology as an object of innovation in an IS organization. It has two main research objectives. It was intended to understand the critical affecting factors which have an effect on the processing of each level in the dynamic and evolving innovation process. There are two levels of innovation process: initiation and implementation. It was also intended to understand the performance of IS organizational innovation. We found three main results by the LISREL analysis. First, main factors affecting initiation level of innovation are innovative tendency of IS members, communication level of IS organization, existence of champion manager, IS performance gap, executive supporting to IS, and relative advantage of IS development methodology. At the implementation level, it was understood that the existence of champion manager, executive support, and relative advantage of IS development methodology were the main factors promoting to use the innovation, and the complexity of innovation was a negative factor adopting the usage of innovation. Second, the quality of the previous level in the gradual innovation activities gives very notable affection to the continuous next level. Finally, it was found that the qualitative performance like the documentation, collaborative team approach, IS developer's awareness and ability corresponding to their task and so on was improved due to the IS organizational innovation. This research provides the standard framework for the IS organizational innovation in a structural way. In the practical aspect, it may be used as the principle for introducing and using the IS development methodology.

Keywords

References

  1. Armstrong, C.P. and Sambamurthy, V., 'Information Technology Assimilation in Firms: The Influence of Senior Leadership and IT Infrastructures,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No.4, December 1999,pp. 304-327 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.4.304
  2. Baldridge, J.V. and Burnham, 'Organizational Innovation: Individual, Organizational, and Environmental Impact,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, 1975, pp. 165-176 https://doi.org/10.2307/2391692
  3. Bayer, J. and Melone, N., 'A Critique of Diffusion Theory as a Managerial Framework for Understanding Adoption of Software Engineering Innovations,' The Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 9, 1989b, pp. 161-166 https://doi.org/10.1016/0164-1212(89)90018-6
  4. Beath, C.M., 'Supporting the Information Technology Champion,' MIS Quarterly, September, 1991, pp. 354-372
  5. Brancheau, J.C and Weatherbe, J.C., 'The Adoption of Spreadsheet Software: Testing Innovation Diffusion Theory in the Context of End-User Computing,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 1, No.2, 1990, pp. 115-143 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1.2.115
  6. Brian F., 'An Empirical Investigation into the Adoption of Systems Development Methodologies,' Information & Management, Vol. 34, 1998, pp. 317-328 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(98)00072-X
  7. Burgelman, R.A. and Sayles, L., Inside Corporate Innovation: Strategy, Structure and Managerial Skills, New York: Free Press, 1986
  8. Burkhardt, M.E. and Brass, D.J., 'Changing Patterns or Patterns of Change: The Effects of a Change in Technology on Social Network Structure and Power,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 1, 1990, pp. 104-127
  9. Carter Jr., F.J., Jambulingam, G., Gupta, V.K., Melone, N., 'Technological Innovations: A Framework for Communicating Diffusion Effects,' Information & Management, Vol. 38, 2001, pp. 277-287 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00065-3
  10. Cho, N. and Evan, W.M., 'Organizational Lag and Performance: A Comparative Study of Two Korean Automobile Plants,' working paper, Philadelpia, Pa: University of Pennsylvania, 1988, pp. 11-88
  11. Daft, R.L., Organization Theory and Design, St. Paul: West, 1989
  12. Damanpour, F., 'Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators,' Academy of Management loumal., Vol 34, No.3, 1991, pp. 555-590 https://doi.org/10.2307/256406
  13. Damanpour, F. and Szabat, K.A., 'The Relationship Between Types of Innovation and Organizational Performance,' Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 26, No.6, 1989, pp. 587-601 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1989.tb00746.x
  14. Damanpour, F. and Evan, W.M., 'Organizational Innovation and Performance: The problem of 'Organizational Lag,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 29, 1984, pp. 392-409 https://doi.org/10.2307/2393031
  15. Dean, J.W., 'Building the Future: The Justification Process for New Technology,' in Johannes, M.P. and Aren, B.(eds), New Technology as Organizational Innovation, Cambridge, MA, Ballinger, 1987, pp. 35-58
  16. Dekleva, S., 'The Influence of the Information Systems Development Approach on Maintenance,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, No.3, 1992, pp. 355-372 https://doi.org/10.2307/249533
  17. Dewar, R.D. and Dutton, J.E., 'The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis,' Management Science, Vol. 32, 1986, pp. 1422-1433 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
  18. Dyer, Jr., W.G and Page, Jr., 'The Politics of Innovation,' Knowledge in Society: An International Journal of Knowledge Transfer, Vol. 1, 1988, pp. 23-41
  19. Ettlie, J.E., 'Organizational Policy and Innovation among Suppliers to the Food Processing Sector,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 26, 1983, pp. 27-44 https://doi.org/10.2307/256133
  20. Evan, W.M., 'Organizational lag,' Human Organizations, Vol. 25, 1966, pp. 51-53 https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.25.1.v7354t3822136580
  21. Fichman, R.G, 'The Role of Aggregation in the Measurement of IT-Related Fichman, Organizational Innovation,' MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No.4, 2001, pp. 427-455 https://doi.org/10.2307/3250990
  22. Fichman., R.G and Kemerer, C.F., 'The Illusory Diffusion of Innovation: An Examination of Assimilation Gaps,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 10, No.3, September 1999, pp. 255-275 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.10.3.255
  23. Finlay, P.N. and Mitchell, A.C, 'Perceptions of the Benefits From the Introduction of CASE: An Empirical Study,' MIS Quarterly, No.3, 1994, pp. 353-369
  24. Grover, V., 'An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer-based Inter-Organizational Systems,' Decision Science, Vol. 24, No.3, 1993, pp. 603-640 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1993.tb01295.x
  25. Hage, J. and Dewar, R, 'Elite Values versus Organizational Structure in Predicting Innovation,' Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 18, 1973, pp. 279-290 https://doi.org/10.2307/2391664
  26. Harkness, W.L. and Kettinger, W.J., 'Sustaining Process Improvement and Innovation in the Information Services Function:Lessons Learned at the Bose Corporation,' MIS Quarterly, No.3, .1996, pp. 349-367
  27. Huff, S.L. and Munro, M.C., 'Information Technology Assessment and Adoption: A Field Study,' MIS Quarterly, 1985, pp. 327-339
  28. Jayaratna, N., Understanding and Evaluation Methodologies, NISAD: A Systematic Framework, Maidenhead, UK: McGraw-Hill, 1994
  29. Juhani, I., Rudy H., and Heinz, K.K, 'A Dynamic Framework for Classifying Information Systems Development Methodologies and Approaches,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 17, No.3, 2000, pp. 179-218
  30. Keen, P.G.W., 'Information Systems and Organizational Change,' Communication of the ACM, Vol. 24, No.1, 1981, pp. 24-33 https://doi.org/10.1145/358527.358543
  31. Kimberly, J.R and Evanisko, M., 'Organizational Innovation: The Influence of Individual, Organizational, and Contextual Factors on Hospital Adoption of Technological and Administrative Innovations,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 24, No.4, 1981, pp. 689-713 https://doi.org/10.2307/256170
  32. Lederer, A.L. and Sethi, V., 'The Implementation of Strategic Information Systems Planning Methodologies,' MIS Quarterly, No.3, 1988, pp. 445-444
  33. Lee, T.H., Adopting Interrelated Innovations: Understanding the Deployment of Emerging Case Technology in Information Systems Organizations, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1994
  34. Leonard-Barton, D., 'Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations,' Communication Research, Vol. 15, No.5, 1988, pp. 603-631 https://doi.org/10.1177/009365088015005006
  35. Lind, M.R, and Zmud, R.W., 'The Influence of a Convergence in Understanding between Technology Providers and Users on Information Technology Inovativeness,' Organization Science, Vol. 2, No.2, 1991, pp. 195-216 https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.2.195
  36. Loh. L, and Venkatraman, N., 'Diffusion of Information Technology Outsourcing: Influence Sources and the Kodak Effect,' Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No.4, 1992, pp. 334-357 https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.4.334
  37. Lucas, H.C. Jr., Implementation: The Key to Successful Information Systems, Columbia University Press, New York, 1981
  38. Manross, G.G. and Rice, R.E., 'Don't Hang Up: Organizational Diffusion of the Intelligent Telephone,' Information & Manage-ment, Vol. 10, 1986, pp. 161-175 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(86)90025-X
  39. Moore, G.C., 'End User Computing and Office Automation: A Diffusion of Innovations Perspective,' INFOR, Vol. 25, No. 3, 1987, pp. 214-235
  40. Moore, G.C. and Benbasat, I., 'Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,' Information Systems Research, September, 1991, pp. 192-222
  41. Meyer, A.D. and Goes, J.B., 'Organizational Assimilation of Innovations: A Multilevel Contextual Analysis,' Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 31, No.4, 1988, pp. 897-923 https://doi.org/10.2307/256344
  42. Nilakanta, S. and Scamell, R, 'The Effect of Information Sources and Communication Charmels on the Diffusion of Innovation in a Database Development Environment,' Management Science, January, 1990, pp.
  43. Orlikowski, W.J., 'CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development,' MIS Quarterly, September, 1993, pp. 309-340
  44. Rai, A and Howard, G.S., 'Propagating CASE Usage for Software Development: An Empirical Investigation of Key Organizational Correlates,' OMEGA Int. Journal of Management Science, Vol. 22, No.2, 1994, pp. 133-147 https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(94)90074-4
  45. Rai, A and Howard, G.S., 'An Organizational Context for CASE Innovation,' Information Resources Management Journal, Vol. 6, No.3, 1993, pp. 21-34
  46. Rai, A and Patnayakuni, R, 'A Structural Model for CASE Adoption Behavior,' Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 13, No.2, 1996, pp. 205-234
  47. Ramamurthy, K, Role of Environmental, Organizational and Technological Factors in Information Technology Implementation in Advanced Manufacturing: An Innovation Adoption-Diffusion Perspective, Ph.D Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1990
  48. Rogers, E.M., Diffusion of Innovation(2nd ed.), New York: Free Press, 1983
  49. Rogers, E.M., The Diffusion of Innovations, Free Press of Glencoe, New York, 1962
  50. Rogers, E.M. and Shoemaker, Communication of Innovations: A Cross-Cultural Approach, New York: Free Press, 1971
  51. Ruso, N.L., The Impact of Context on Innovation in Information Systems, Ph.D Dissertation, Georgia State University, 1993
  52. Schroeder, R.G., Van de Ven, A.H., Scudder, G.D. and Polley, D., 'The Development of Innovation Ideas,' In Van de Ven, A.H., Angle, H.L. and Poole, M.S. (eds.), Research on the Management of Innovation: The Minnesota Studies, New York: Harper & Row, 1989, pp. 107-034
  53. Schultz, R.L. and Ginzberg, M.J., (eds.) Management Science Implementation, JAI Press, 1984
  54. Swanson, E.B., 'Information Systems Innovation Among Organization,' Management Science, Vol. 40, No.9, 1994, pp. 1069-1092 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.40.9.1069
  55. Teece, D.J., 'The Diffusion of an Administrative Innovation,' Management Science, Vol. 26, 1980, pp. 464-470 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.5.464
  56. Tomatsky, L.G and Klein, K.J., 'Innovation Characteristics and Innovation Adoption-Implementation: A Meta-Analysis of Findings,' IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, EM-29, 1982, pp. 8-45
  57. Utterback, J.M., 'Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology,' Science, Vol. 183, No.2, 1974, pp. 620-626 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.183.4125.620
  58. Van de Ven, AH., 'Central Problems in the Management of Innovation,' Management Science, Vol. 32, No.5, 1986, pp. 590-607 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.590
  59. Wolfe, R.A, 'Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions,' Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 31, No.3, 1994, pp. 405-431 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1994.tb00624.x
  60. Wong-Martinez, C.G., Determinants of Innovation in U.S. Public Libraries, Ph.D Dissertation, Drexel University, 1995
  61. Yourdon, Modern Structured Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1989
  62. Zaltman, G, Duncan, R., and Holbek, J., Innovation and Organizations, New York, Wiley, 1973
  63. Zmud, R.W., 'Diffusion of Modem Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization,' Management Science, Vol. 28, 1982, pp. 1421-1431 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.28.12.1421
  64. Zmud, R.W., 'The Effectiveness of External Information Channels in Facilitating Innovation within Software Development Groups,' MIS Quarterly, June 1983, pp. 43-58
  65. Zmud, R.W., 'An Examination of Push-Pull Theory Applied to Process. Innovation in Knowledge Work,' Management Science, Vol. 30, 1984, pp. 727-738 https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.6.727