Parthenogenetic Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells have Similar Characteristics to In Vitro Fertilization mES Cells

체외수정 유래 생쥐 배아줄기세포와 유사한 특성을 보유한 단위발생 유래 생쥐 배아줄기세포

  • 박세필 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 김은영 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 이금실 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 이영재 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 신현아 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 민현정 (마리아 기초의학연구소/마리아 생명공학연구소) ;
  • 이훈택 (건국대학교) ;
  • 정길생 (건국대학교) ;
  • 임진호 (마리아병원)
  • Published : 2002.06.30

Abstract

Objective: This study was to compare the characteristics between parthenogenetic mES (P-mES) cells and in vitro fertilization mES cells. Materials and Methods: Mouse oocytes were recovered from superovulated 4 wks hybrid F1 (C57BL/6xCBA/N) female mice. For parthenogenetic activation, oocytes were treated with 7% ethanol for 5 min and $5{\mu}g$/ml cytochalasin-B for 4 h. For IVF, oocytes were inseminated with epididymal sperm of hybrid F1 male mice ($1{times}10^6/ml$). IVF and parthenogenetic embryos were cultured in M16 medium for 4 days. Cell number count of blastocysts in those two groups was taken by differential labelling using propidium iodide (red) and bisbenzimide (blue). To establish ES cells, b1astocysts in IVF and parthenogenetic groups were treated by immunosurgery and recovered inner cell mass (ICM) cells were cultured in LIF added ES culture medium. To identify ES cells, the surface markers alkaline phosphatase, SSEA-1, 3,4 and Oct4 staining were examined in rep1ated ICM colonies. Chromosome numbers in P-mES and mES were checked. Also, in vitro differentiation potential of P-mES and mES was examined. Results: Although the cleavage rate (${\geq}$2-cell) was not different between IVF (76.3%) and parthenogenetic group (67.0%), in vitro development rate was significantly low in parthenogenetic group (24.0%) than IVF group (68.4%) (p<0.05). Cell number count of ICM and total cell in parthenogenetic b1astocysts ($9.6{\pm}3.1,\;35.1{\pm}5.2$) were signficantly lower than those of IVF blastocysts ($19.5{\pm}4.7,\;63.2{\pm}13.0$) (p<0.05). Through the serial treatment procedure such as immunosurgery, plating of ICM and colony formation, two ICM colonies in IVF group (mES, 10.0%) and three ICM colonies (P-mES, 42.9%) in parthenogenetic group were able to culture for extended duration (25 and 20 passages, respectively). Using surface markers, alkaline phosphatase, SSEA-l and Oct4 in P-mES and mES colony were positively stained. The number of chromosome was normal in ES colony from two groups. Also, in vitro neural and cardiac cell differentiation derived from mES or P-mES cells was confirmed. Conclusion: This study suggested that P-mES cells can be successfully established and that those cell lines have similar characteristics to mES cells.

Keywords

References

  1. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Wakinitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 1998; 282: 1145-7 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.282.5391.1145
  2. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 1981; 292: 154-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/292154a0
  3. Reubinoff BE, Pera MF, Fong CY, Trounson A, Bongso A. Embryonic stem cell line from human blastocysts: somatic differentiation in vitro. Nat Biotech 2000; 18:399-404 https://doi.org/10.1038/74447
  4. Reubinoff BE, Itsykson P, Turetsky T, Pera MF, Reinhartz E, Itzik A, Ben-Hur T. Neural progenitors from human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotech 2001; 19: 1134-40 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1201-1134
  5. Zhang SC, Wernig M, Duncan ID, Brustle O, Thomson JA. In vitro differentiation of transplantatable neural precursors form human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotech 2001; 19: 1129-33 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1201-1129
  6. Shuldiner M, Yanuka O, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Melton DA, Benvenistry N. Effects of eight growth factors on the differentiation of cells derived from human embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000;97: 11307-12 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.21.11307
  7. Campbell KHS, Wilmut I. Totipotency or multipoteniality of culture cells: applications and progress. Theriogenology 1997;47: 63-72 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(96)00340-8
  8. Kaufman MH. Cromosome analysis of early post implantation presumptive haploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos. J Embryol Exp Morphol 1978; 45: 85-91.7
  9. Henery CC, Kafman MH. Cleavage rate of haploid and diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos during the primplantation period. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 31: 258-63 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080310406
  10. Fukui Y, Sawai K, Furudate M, Sato N, Lwazumi Y, Ohasaki K. Parthenogenetic development of bovine oocytes treated with ethanol and cytichalasin B after in vitro maturation. Mol Reprod Dev 1992; 33: 357-62 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.1080330318
  11. Park JI, Yoshida I, Tada T, Takagi N, Takahashi Y, Kanagawa H. Differentiative potential of a mouse parthenogenetic embryonic stem cell line revealed by embryoid body formation in vitro. Jpn J Vet Res 1998; 46: 19-28
  12. Cibelli JB, Grant KA, Chapman KB, Cunniff K, Worst T, Green HL, Walker SJ, et al. Parthenogenetic stem cells in nonhuman primates. Science 2002;295:819 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1065637
  13. 김은영, 남화경, 이금실, 박세영, 박은미, 윤지연, 허영태, 조현정, 박세필, 정길생, 임진호. 동결-융해된 인간 배반포기배 유래의 배아줄기세포 배양. Kor J Fertil Steril 2001; 28: 33-40
  14. Trounaon A. The genesis of embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotech 2002;20: 237-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0302-237