Journal of the Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회지)

The Korean Home Economics Association (대한가정학회)
권호 표지

Marital Instability of Wives Who Experienced Abuse from Their Husbands

학대 경험 아내들의 결혼불안정성에 관한 연구

  • Published : 2002.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study was to investigate the relationships of personal resources, individual psychological variables, and relational characteristics with marital instability of wives who experienced physical and/or psychological abuse from their husbands, and to analyze the relative significance of related variables on marital instability. Self-administered questionnaire method was used to collect data from 500 wives residing in Chonbuk-do province, and data from 306 wives who reported to be psychologically and/or physically abused during last three years were used in the final analyses. Results showed that there were significant differences in the levels of marital instability according to wives' employment status, number of children, and occupational status of husbands. Correlational analyses indicated that wives' economic dependence, all individual psychological variables, and three relational variables were significantly correlated with marital instability of abused wives. Finally, multiple regression analyses showed that marital comparison level and degree of abuse from husband were the most powerful predictors on marital instability, and all these variables accounted for 61% of the total variance of abused wives' marital instability.

Keywords

References

  1. 강병서(1999). 인과분석을 위한 연구방법론. 서울: 무역경영사
  2. 김경신(1998). 부모와 청소년 자녀의 가족가치관과 세대간 유사성. 한국가족관계학회지, 3(2), 43-65
  3. 김경신, 박옥임, 정혜정(1999). 가부장적 관점에서의 가정폭력 -아내학대를 중심으로. 한국가족관계학회지, 4(2), 213-239
  4. 김광일(1988). 구타당하는 아내의 정신의학적 연구. 김광일 편저, 가정폭력. 서울: 탐구당
  5. 김미숙, 김명자(1990). 도시 부부의 결혼안정성 및 그 관련변인 연구. 한국가정관리학회지, 8(1), 171-183
  6. 김수연, 김득성(2001). 부부폭력과 결혼불안정성의 관계. 한국가정관리학회지, 19(1), 53-62
  7. 김정옥, 류배희(1997). 부부폭력과 아동의 신체적, 정서적 학대와의 관계. 대한가정학회지, 35(3), 205-220
  8. 김정옥, 전형미, 이현혜(1992). 자아존중감, 부부간의사소통 및 결합력이 아내학대에 미치는 영향. 여성문제연구, 20, 21-42
  9. 김지영(1995) 학대받는 아내를 위한 사회복지 관련 기관의 서비스 현황에 관한 연구. 숭실대 석사학위논문
  10. 델 마틴 지음, 정세웅 옮김(1992). 매맞는 여자들. 서울: 한국문연
  11. 손정영(1997). 갈등대처유형척도 (CTS2)의 한국 부부에 대한 타당성 연구 -남편의 갈등대처 유형 및 아내 학대 행위를 중심으로. 한국가족관계학회지, 2, 51-87
  12. 손정영, 유영주(1998). 아내학대의 원인에 대한 생태학적 연구. 대한가정학회지, 36(12), 145-160
  13. 윤경자, Schumm, W. R.(1993). 교환이론적 관점에서 본 결혼관계에서의 비교수준과 대안에 대한 비교수준의 측정: 비교수준 척도와 대안에 대한 비교수준 척도의 개발. 대한가정학회지, 31(4), 133-140
  14. 윤현봉(1985) 부부간의 권력관계에 관한 조사연구. 이대 석사학위논문
  15. 이영숙, 박경란, 전귀연(1999). 가족문제론. 서울: 학지사
  16. 이정덕, 김경신, 문혜숙, 송현애, 김일명 (1998). 결혼과 가족의 이해. 서울: 학지사
  17. 정복희(1993). 아내학대가 생활의 질에 미치는 영향. 효성여대 대학원 석사학위논문
  18. 정서영(1995). 부부간의 심리적, 신체적 학대, 대처양식과 개인의 적응감. 숙대 석사학위논문
  19. 정혜정(1999). 아내학대에 대한 적응의 영향 변인. 대한가정학회지, 37(10), 107-122
  20. 중앙일보. 2002. 2. 2
  21. 최규련(1996). 한국에서의 부부간 폭력에 대한 대책연구. 한국가족관계학회지, 1, 103-130
  22. 최연실(1987). 사회경제적 지위에 따른 결혼만족도와 결혼안정성에 관한 연구. 서울대 석사논문
  23. 한국여성개발원(1993). 한국의 가정폭력의 예방과 대책에 관한 연구. 서울: 저자
  24. 한국형사정책연구원(1992). 가정폭력의 실태와 대책에 관한 연구 -서울시의 남편의 아내폭력 현황을 중심으로- 서울: 한국형사정책연구원
  25. 허남순(1993). 아내구타에 대한 대책 및 치료기법에 관한 연구. 한림대 사회복지연구소 편. 비교사회복지, 2, 227-320
  26. Booth, A. & Edwards, J. (1983). Measuring marital instability. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 387-393 https://doi.org/10.2307/351516
  27. Bowker, L. H. (1993). Beating wife beating. Lexington, MA: Lexington Book
  28. DeMaris, A. (2000). Till discord do us part: The roleof physical and verbal conflict in union disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62(3), 683-692 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00683.x
  29. Ferraro, K. J. & Johnson, J. M. (1983). How women experience battering: The process of victimizauon. Social Problems, 30, 325-339 https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.1983.30.3.03a00080
  30. Gelles, R. (1976). Abused Wives: Why do they stay? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 33, 659-668
  31. Hamby, S. L. & Sugarman, D. B. (1999). Acts of psychological aggression against a partner and their relation to physical assault and gender. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61(4), 959-970 https://doi.org/10.2307/354016
  32. Herbert, T. B., Silver, R. C., & Ellard, J. H. (1991). Coping with an abusive relationship: I. How and why do women stay. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53(2), 311-325 https://doi.org/10.2307/352901
  33. Johnson, M. P. & Ferraro, K. J. (2000). Research on domestic violence in the 1990s: Making distinctions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 948-963 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-3737.2000.00948.x
  34. Kalmuss, D. & Seltzer, J. A. (1986). Continuity of marital behavior in remarriage: The case of spouse abuse. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 113-120 https://doi.org/10.2307/352234
  35. Katz, J., Arias, L., Beach, S. R. H., Brody, G., & Roman, P. (1995). Excuses, excuses: Accounting for the effects of partner violence on marital satisfaction and stability. Violence and victims, 10, 315-316
  36. Kurz, D. (1993). Physical assaults by husbands: Amajor social problem. In R. Gelles & D. Loseke(Eds.), Current controversies on family violence. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
  37. Kurz, D.(1996). Separation, divorce, and womanabuse. Violence Against Women, 2, 63-81 https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801296002001004
  38. Leonard, K. E. & Roberts, L. J. (1998). Marital aggression, quality, and stability in the first year of marriage: Finding from the Buffalo newlywed study. In T. N. Bradbury (Ed.), The developmental course of marital dysfunction. NewYork: Cambridge University Press
  39. Levinger, G. (1965). Marital cohesiveness and dissolution: An integrative review. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 27, 32-33 https://doi.org/10.2307/349803
  40. Lewis, R. A. & Spanier, G. B. (1979). Theorizing about the quality and stability of marriage. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I. Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family. NY: Free Press
  41. Nye, F. I. (1979). Choice, exchange, and the family. In W. R. Burr, R. Hill, F. I Nye, & I. L. Reiss (Eds.), Contemporary theories about the family, 2. NY: Free Press
  42. Ono (1998). Husbands' and wives' resources and marital dissolution. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 60, 674-689 https://doi.org/10.2307/353537
  43. Pagelow, M. (1981). Women beating: Victims and theirexperiences. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
  44. Pence, E. & Payman, M. (1993). Education groups formen who batter. NY: Springer
  45. Rogge, R. D. & Bradbury, T. N. (1999). Till violence does us part: The differing roles of communication and aggression in predicting adverse marital outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(3), 340-351 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.67.3.340
  46. Rusbult, C. E.& Martz, J. M. (1995) Remaining in anabusive relationship: An investment model analysis of nonvoluntary dependence. Personality and Social Psychological Bulletin, 21, 558-571 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295216002
  47. South, S. J. & Lloyd, K. M. (1995). Spousal alternatives and marital dissolution. American Sociological Review, 60, 21-35 https://doi.org/10.2307/2096343
  48. Straus, M. A., Hamby, S. L., McCoy, S. B., & Sugarman, D. B. (1996). The revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17(3), 283-316 https://doi.org/10.1177/019251396017003001
  49. Straus, M. A. & Sweet, S. (1992). Verbal/symbolic aggression in couples: Incidence rates and relationship to personal characteristics. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 346-357 https://doi.org/10.2307/353066
  50. Strube, M. J. & Barbour, L. S. (1983). The decision to leave an abusive relationship: Economic dependence and psychological commitment. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 785-793 https://doi.org/10.2307/351791
  51. Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psyclwlogy of groups. NY: Wiley
  52. Trunninger, E. (1971). Marital vilolence: The legalsolutions. Hastings Law Review, 23, 259-276
  53. Udry, J. R. (1981). Marital alternatives and marital disruption. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, 889-897 https://doi.org/10.2307/351345
  54. Udry, J. R. (1983). The marital happiness/disruption relationship by level of marital alternatives. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 45, 221-222 https://doi.org/10.2307/351311