Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제27권6호
  • /
  • Pages.569-576
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

수리된 복합레진 수복물의 전단결합강도 연구

SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF REPAIRED COMPOSITE RESIN RESTORATIONS

  • 최수영 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소) ;
  • 정선와 (서남대학교 의과대학 치과학교실) ;
  • 황윤찬 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소) ;
  • 김선호 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소) ;
  • 윤창 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소) ;
  • 오원만 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소) ;
  • 황인남 (전남대학교 치과대학 보존학교실, 치의학 연구소)
  • Choi, Soo-young (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jeong, Sun-Wa (Dept. of Dentistry, College of Medicine, Seonam University) ;
  • Hwang, Yun-Chan (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Sun-Ho (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Yun, Chang (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Won-Mann (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Hwang, In-Nam (Dept. of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, DSRI, Chonnam National University)
  • 발행 : 2002.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This study was peformed to evaluate the interfacial shear bond strength of base (direct and indirect) and repair composites with aging and surface treatment methods. Direct composite resin specimens ($Charisma^{\circledR}$, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) were aged for 5 min, 1 hour, 24 hours, and 1 week in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water before surface treatment, and then divided into five groups Group 1, grinding; Group 2, grinding and application of bonding agent, Group 3, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 30sec, and application of bonding agent, Group 4, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 30sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent ; Group 5, grinding, etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 30sec. silane treatment, and application of bonding agent. Indirect composite resin specimens ($Artglass^{\circledR}$, Heraeus Kulzer, Germany) were aged for 1 week in $37^{\circ}C$ distilled water and divided into seven groups Group 1 - Group 5, equal to Charisma specimens; Group 6, grinding, etching with 37% phosphoric acid for 60sec, silane treatment, and application of bonding agent; Group7, grinding, etching with 4% hydrofluoric acid for 60 sec, silane treatment, and application of bond-ing agent. The repair material($Charisma^{\circledR}$) was then added on the center of the surface (5 mm in diameter. 5 mm in height). The shear bond strength was tested and the data was analyzed using one-way ANOVA and the Student- Newman-Keuls test. The following conclusions were drawn. 1 The shear bond strength of $Charisma^{\circledR}$ specimens aged for 1 hour was significantly higher in Group 2 and Group 5 than in Group 1 (p<0.05), and that of $Charisma^{\circledR}$ specimens aged for 1 week was signifi-cantly higher in Group 3 and Group 5 than in Group 1 (p<0.05). No significant difference was found in the bond strength of specimens aged for 5 min and 24 hours. 2. In Group 2 of the $Charisma^{\circledR}$ specimens, there was significant difference between the bond strength of 24 hours and that of 1 week (p<0.05). 3. In Group 4 of the $Charisma^{\circledR}$ specimens, the shear bond strength of specimens aged for 24 hours was significantly higher than the others(p<0.05) 4. There was no significant difference between the shear bond strength of the $Artglass^{\circledR}$ specimens, 5. Most of the $Charisma^{\circledR}$ specimens showed cohesive fractures. Artglass^{\circledR}$ specimens that were etched with acid (phosphoric or hydrofluoric) for 30 sec showed more cohesive fractures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Chan DCN. Lemake KC. Howell ML. Barghi N : The effect of microabrasion on restorative materials and tooth surface. Oper Dent 21:63-68, 1996
  2. Shahdad SA, Kennedy JG : Bond strength of repaired anterior composite resins: an in vitro study. J Dent 26:685-694, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00044-4
  3. Lewis G, Johnson W, Martin W, Canerdy A, Claburn C, Collier M : Shear bond strength of immediately repaired light-cured composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 23:121-127, 1998
  4. Miranda FJ, Duncanson MG, Dilts WE : Interfacial bonding strengths of paired composite systems. J Prosthet Dent 51:29-32, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(84)80098-0
  5. Davis BR, Millar BJ, Wood DJ, Budd NL : Strength of secondary-cured resin composite inlay repairs. Quint Int 28:415-419, 1997
  6. 강현숙, 최호영 : 표면처리된 복합레진에 대한 수리용 레진의 결합강도에 관한 연구. 대한치과보존학회지 20:487-507, 1995
  7. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Reinhardt JW : Build-up and repair of light-cured composites: bond strength. J Dent Res 63:1241-1244, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630101501
  8. Vankerckhoven H, Lambrechts P, Van Beylen M, Davidson CL, Vanherle G: Unreacted methacrylate groups on the surfaces of composite resins. J Dent Res 61:791-795, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345820610062801
  9. Lloyd CH, Baigrie DA, Jeffrey IW : The tensile strength of composite repairs, J Dent 8:171-177, 1980 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(80)90036-6
  10. Forsten L, Valiaho ML : Transverse and bond strengths of restorative resins. Acta Odontol Scand 29:525-537, 1971
  11. Reisbick MH, Brodsky BA : Strength parameters of composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 26:178-185, 1971 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(71)90050-3
  12. Boyer DB, Chan KC, Torney DL : The strength of multilayer and repaired composite resin. J Prosthet Dent 39:63-67, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80049-3
  13. Chiba K, Hosoda H. Fusayama T : The addition of an adhesive composite resin to the same material: bond strength and clinical techniques. J Prosthet Dent 61:669-675, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(89)80039-3
  14. Turner CW, Meiers JC : Repair of an aged, contaminated indirect composite resin with a direct, visible light-cured composite resin. Oper Dent 18:187-194, 1993
  15. Brosh T, Pilo R, Bichacho N, Blutstein R : Effect of combination of surface treatments and bonding agents on the bond strength of repaired composites. J Prosthet Dent 77:122-126, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(97)70224-5
  16. Puckett AD, Holder R, O'Hara JW : Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations. Oper Dent 16:136-140, 1991
  17. Swift EJ Jr, LeValley BD, Boyer DB : Evaluation of new methods for composite repair. Dent Mater 8:362-365, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90020-D
  18. Soderholm KJ, Roberts MJ : Variables influencing the repair strength of dental composites. Scand J Dent Res 99:173-180, 1991
  19. Swift EJ, Wilder AD, May KN, Waddell SL : Shear bond strengths of one-bottle dentin adhesives using multiple applications. Oper Dent 22:194-199, 1997
  20. Barkmeier WW, Erickson RL : Shear bond strength of composite to enamel and dentin using Scotchbond Multi-Purpose. Am J Dent 7:175-179, 1994
  21. Gwinnett AJ, Yu S : Shear bond strength, microleakage and gap formation with fourth generation dentin bonding agents. Am J Dent 7:312-314, 1994
  22. Kanca J III : Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quint Int 23:39-41, 1991
  23. Crumpler DC, Bayne SC, Sockwell S, Brunson D, Roberson TM : Bonding to resurfaced posterior composites. Dent Mater 5:417-424, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90113-9
  24. Pounder B, Gregory WA, Powers JM : Bond strenths of repaired composite resins. Oper Dent 12:127-131, 1987
  25. Eli I, Liberman R, Levi N, Haspel Y : Bond strength of joined posterior light-cured composites: comparison of surface treatments. J Prosthet Dent 60:185-189, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90313-7
  26. Eliades GC, Caputo AA : The strength of layering technique in visible light-cured composites. J Prosthet Dent 61:31-38, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90104-2
  27. Azarbal P, Boyer DB, Chan KC : The effect of bonding agents on the interfacial bond strength of repaired composites. Dent Mater 2:153-155, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80025-2
  28. Saunders WP : Effect of fatigue upon the interfacial bond strength of repaired composite resins. J Dent 18:158-162, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(90)90059-N
  29. Bouschlicher MR, Reinhardt JW, Vargas MA : Surface treatment techniques for resin composite repair. Am J Dent 10:279-283, 1997
  30. Matsumura H, Hisamatsu N, Atsuta M : Effect of unfilled resins and a silane primer on bonding between layers of a light-activated composite resin veneering material. J Prosthet Dent 73:386-391, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80336-1
  31. Kula K, Nelson S, Thompson V : In vitro effect of APF gel on three composite resins. J Dent Res 62:846-849, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620071901
  32. Kula K, Nelson S, Kula T, Thompson V : In vitro effect of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel on the surface of composites with different filler particles. J Prosthet Dent 56:161-169, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90465-8
  33. Aschheim KW, Dale BG : Composite resin: indirect technique restorations. Esthetic Dentistry, 2nd ed.. St. Louis, Mosby Co., 2001, pp 97-111

피인용 문헌

  1. The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.461