Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

MARGINAL MICROLEAKAGE OF SELF-ETCHING PRIMER ADHESIVES AND A SELF-ETCHING ADHESIVE

자가 산부식 프라이머와 자가 산부식 접착제의 변연 미세누출

  • Cho, Young-Gon (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Cho, Kong-Chul (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Chosun University)
  • 조영곤 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 조공철 (조선대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Published : 2002.09.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study evaluated the microleakage performance of four self-etcing primer adhesives(Clearfil SE Bond, Clearfil Liner Bond 2, UniFil Bond, and FL Bond) and one self-etching adhesive(Prompt L-Pop). Class V cavity preparations with occlusal margins in enamel and gingival margins in dentin were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 50 extracted human molar teeth. Prepared teeth were randomly divided into five groups and restored using one of five adhesives and composite resins: Prompt L-Pop/Filtek Z 250(Group 1), Clearfil SE Bond/Clearfil AP-X(Group 2), Clearfil Liner Bond 2/Clearfil AP-X(Group 3), UniFil Bond/UniFil F(Group 4), and FL Bond/Filtek Z 250(Group 5). Following one day storage in room temperature water, the restored teeth were thermocycled for 500 cycles between 5$^{\circ}C$ and 55$^{\circ}C$. Marginal microleakage was assessed by dye penetration using 2% methylene blue dye. After 24 hours, the teeth were sectioned longitudinally and evaluated for microleakage under steromicroscope The data were statistically analysed by Kruskal-Wallis Test, Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon signed ranked tests. The results of this study were as follows ; 1. The microleakges at both enamel and dentinal mal$.$gins were the lowest in group 4. increasing among groups in the following order: group 2, follwed by group 5, follwed by group 1, and the highest in group 3. 2. At the enamel margins, the microleakage of group 3 was significantly higher than those of groups 2. 4 and 5(p<0.05), and also the microleakage of group 1 was statistically higher than those of groups 2 and 5(p<0.05). 3. At the dentinal margins, microleakage of group 3 was signincantly higher than microleakages of groups 1, 2, 4 and 5(p<0.05). 4. Compared with microleakages between the enamel and dentinal margins of each group, groups 1, 4 and 5 at enamel margin and group 2 and group 3 at dentinal margin were higher microleakage. But there was no significant difference between enamel and dentinal microleakages of each group(p>0.05).

Keywords

References

  1. Perdigao J, Frankenberger R, Rosa BT, Breschi L : New trend in dentin/enamel adhesion. Am J Dent 13: 25-30, 2000
  2. Davidson CL, Degee AJ, Feilzer AJ : The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and polymeriztion contraction stress. J Dent Res 63(2):1396-1399, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345840630121101
  3. Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL : The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res 79(3): 812-817, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
  4. Pradelle-Plasss N, Nechad S. Tavernier B, Colon P : Effect of dentin adhesives on the enamel-dentin/composite interfacial mroleakage. Am J Dent 14(6): 344-348, 2001
  5. Bergenholtz G, Cox CF, Loesche WJ, Syed SA : Bacterial leakage around dental restorations: Its effect on the dental pulp. J Oral Pathology 11(6): 439-450, 1982 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1982.tb00188.x
  6. Brannstrom M : The cause of post-restorative sensitivity and its prevention. J Endo 12: 475-481, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(86)80202-3
  7. Buonocore MC : Simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surface. J Dent Res 34(6): 849-853, 1955 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345550340060801
  8. Fritz UB, Diedrich P, Finger WJ : Self-etching primers-an alternative to the conventional acid etch technique? J Orofac Orthop 62(3): 238-245, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001931
  9. Hannig M, Reinhardt K-J, Bott B : Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: An alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 24: 172-180, 1999
  10. Bouillaguet S, Gysi P, Wataha JC, Ciucchi B, Cattani M, Godin C, Meyer JM : Bond strength of composite to dentin using conventional. one-step, and self-etching adhesive systems. J Dent 29(1): 55-61, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00049-X
  11. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M : 'No-bottle' vs 'multi-bottle' dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dent Mater 17(5): 373-380, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(00)00084-1
  12. Toledano M. Osorio R, de Leonardi G, Rosales-Leal JI, Ceballos L, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA : Influence of selfetching primer on the resin adhesion to enamel and dentin. Am J Dent 14(4): 205-210, 2001
  13. Besnault C, Attal JP : Influence of a simulated oral environment on microleakage of two adhesive systems in Class II composite restorations. J Dent 30(1): 1-6. 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00050-1
  14. Gordan VV, Vargas MA, Cobb DS, Denehy GE : Evaluation of acidic primers in microleakage of class 5 composite resin restorations. Oper Dent 23: 244-249, 1998
  15. Li H, Burrow MF, Tyas MJ : The effect of load cycling on the nanoleakage of dentin bonding systems. Dent Mater 18(2): 111-119, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(01)00029-X
  16. Yoshiyama M, Urayama A, Kimochi T, Matsuo T, Pashley DH : Comparison of conventional vs self-etching adhesives bonds to caries-affected dentin. Oper Dent 25: 163-169, 2000
  17. Kanca J : Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 5(4): 213-215, 1992
  18. Nakayabashi N : Dentinal bonding mechanism. Quint Int 22(2): 73-74, 1991
  19. Nakayabashi N, Sami. Y : Bonding to intact dentin. J Dent Res 75(9): 1706-1715, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750091401
  20. Pitter AV, Heymann HO, Swift E Jr. Perdigao J, Rosa BT : Effect of different re-wetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthe Dent 12: 85-96, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
  21. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K : Influence of self-etching primer treatment on the adhesion of resin composite to polished dentin and enamel. Dent Mater 105: 99-105, 1998
  22. Miyasaka K, Nakabayashi N : Combination of EDTA conditioner and phenyl-P/HEMA self-etching primer for bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 15(3): 153-157, 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(99)00025-1
  23. Ogata M. Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Effect of dentin primer application on regional bond strength to cervical wedge-shaped cavity walls. Oper Dent 24(2): 81-88, 1999
  24. Finger WJ, Ahlstrand WM : 4-META as an acidic monomer in an all-in-one experimental adhesive. Compend Continu Edu Dent 22(2): 8-11, 2001
  25. Pontes DG, de Melo AT, Monnerat AF : Microleakage of new all-in-one adhesive systems on dentinal and enamel margins. Quint Int 33(2): 136-139, 2002
  26. Zheng L. Pereira PNR. Nakajima M, Sano H, Tagami J : Relationship between adhesive thickness and microtensile bond strength. Oper Dent 26: 97-104, 2001
  27. Inoue S, Van Meebeek B, Vargas M, Yoshida Y, Lambrechts P. Vanherle G : Adhesion mechanism of self-etching adhesives. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd international Kuraray symposium, 131-148, 1999
  28. Prati C, Pashley DH, Chersoni S, Mongiorgi R : Marginal hybrid layer in class V restorations. Oper Dent 25: 228-233, 2000
  29. Barkmeier WW, Los SA, Triolo PT Jr : Bond strengths and SEM evaluation of Clearfil Liner Bond 2. Am J Dent 8(6): 289-293, 1995
  30. Rosa BT, Perdigao J : Bond strengths of nonrinsing adhesives. Quint Int 31: 353-358, 2000
  31. Yoshiyama M, Matsuo T, Ebisu S, Pashley D : Regional bond strengths of self-etching/self-priming adhesive systems. J Dent 26: 609-616, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00046-8
  32. Kidd, E.A.. 'Microleakage: A review.' J. Dent. Res. 47(5):199-205, 1976
  33. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH Jr, Puckett AD : Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth. Oper Dent 20(6): 230-235, 1995
  34. Perdigao J, Lopes L, Lambrechts P : Effects of self-etching primer on enamel shear bond strengths and SEM morphology. Am J Dent 10: 141-146, 1997
  35. Ferrari M, Mannocci F, Vichi A, Davidson CL : Effect of two etching timers on the sealing ability of Clearfil Liner Bond 2 in Class V restorations. Am J Dent 10(2): 66-70, 1997
  36. Swift Jr EJ : Self-etching primers: Part I, J Esthetic Dent 12(3): 111-113. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00208.x
  37. Technical Brief: Unifil Bond, Unifil F composite, GC Corporation. 1999
  38. Hotta K, Mogi M, Miura F, Nakabayashi N : Effects of 4-MET on bond strength and penetration monomers into enamel. Dent Mat 8: 173-175, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90077-P
  39. Kubo S, Yokota H, Sata Y, Hayashi Y : Microleakage of self-etching primers after thermal and flexural load cycling. Am J Dent 14(3): 163-169, 2001
  40. Product Dossier: Prompt L-Pop. ESPE, 1999
  41. Opdam NJ, Roeters FJ. Feilzer AJ, Verdonschot EH : Marginal integrity and postoperative sensitivity in Class 2 resin composite restorations in vivo. J Dent 26(7): 555-562, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00042-0
  42. Nishida K, Yamauchi J, Wata T, Hosoda H : Development of a new bonding system. J Dent Res 72: 137(IADR, Abstract #267), 1993
  43. Imazato S. Ebisu S, Tarumi H, Kinomoto Y, Takeshige F : Development of antibacterial adhesive system: efficacy of new self-etching primer containing antibacterial monomer. Advanced Adhesive Dentistry 3rd international Kuraray symposium, 227-239, 1999
  44. Al-Ehaideb AA, Mohammed H : Microleakage of 'one-bottle' dentin adhesives. Oper Dent 26: 172-175, 2001
  45. Tulunoglu O. Uctash M, Alacam A. Omurlu H : Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modifed glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique. Oper Dent 25: 292-298, 2000
  46. Santini A, Plasschaert AJ, Mitchll S : Effect of composite resin placement techniques on the microleakage of two self-etching dentin-bonding agents. Am J Dent 14(3): 132-136, 2001
  47. Barkmeier WW, Douville CJ, Matranga LF : Shear bond strength, microleakage and scanning electron microscopy study of the Clearfil Liner Bond System. Asian J Aesthet Dent 1(2): 85-90, 1993
  48. Hanning M. Fu B : Effect of air abrasion and resin composite on microleakage of Class V restorations bonded with self-etching primers. J Adhes Dent 3: 265-272, 2001

Cited by

  1. Morphological patterns of self-etching primers and self-etching adhesive bonded to tooth structure vol.28, pp.1, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.1.023
  2. Shear bond strength of self-etching adhesives to dentin and sem analysis vol.28, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.3.222
  3. The effect of additional enamel etching on microleakage of the adhesion of self-etching primer system vol.28, pp.5, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.5.363
  4. Influence of appication time of self-etching primers on dentinal microtensile bond strength vol.29, pp.5, 2004, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2004.29.5.430
  5. Enamel adhesion of light- and chemical-cured composites coupled by two step self-etch adhesives vol.32, pp.3, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.3.169
  6. Effect of microleakage of a self-etching primer adhesive according to types of cutting instruments vol.32, pp.4, 2007, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2007.32.4.327
  7. Comparison of bond strength of a fiber post cemented with various resin cements vol.33, pp.6, 2008, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2008.33.6.499
  8. Effect of cutting instruments on the dentin bond strength of a self-etch adhesive vol.35, pp.1, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.1.013