Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제27권1호
  • /
  • Pages.77-86
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

기질레진의 조성에 따른 복합레진의 물리적 성질에 관한 연구

EFFECT OF RESIN MATRIX ON DEGREE OF CONVERSION AND FRACTURE TOUGHNESS OF DENIAL COMPOSITES

  • 이연신 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 최경규 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실) ;
  • 박상진 (경희대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실)
  • Lee, Yun-Shin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Choi, Kyoung-Kyu (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Sang-Jin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, Graduate School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University)
  • 발행 : 2002.01.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Current composites are made with dimethacrylate monomers and silane-treated silica microfillers, either alone or with silane treated glass fillers The main reasons for clinical failure of dental composites are secondary caries, wear and fracture. Most of practitioner want to get a composite which is more tougher under occlusal stress, less polymerization contraction, and better handling properties in application clinically. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of resin matrix with various flows on the physical proper-ties such as fracture toughness and degree of conversion of the experimental resins. It was hypothesized that flexible or tough resin composites can be designed by judicious choice of monomer composition Various flow resin matrices containing Bis-GMA, UDMA, and TEG-DMA were made by altering the pro-portion of the monomers. After the unfilled resins were light-cured for different light intensity, the fracture toughness(K$_{1c}$) was measured according to ASTM standard using the single edge notched geometry, and degree of conversion(DC) was measured by FTIR. And experimental composites were formulated with variations in the proportion of silanated quartz and strontium glass fillers as 60, 75, and 77wt%. Also, the physical properties of composites with various filer contents were evaluated as same manner. All resulting data were compared by ANOVA/Tukeys test at 0.05 level. The results were as follows; 1. The degree of conversion of high flow resin containing less Bis-GMA was higher than that of low flow unfilled resin 2. While the degree of conversion of unfilled resin was increased according to light intensity for polymerization, there was no significant increase with moderate and high light intensity. Also, the fracture toughness was not increased by high light intensity. 3. The fracture toughness was high in the low flow unfilled resin containing higher contents of Bis-GMA. 4. There was a significant increase for fracture toughness and a tendency for degree of conversion to be reduced when the content of fillers was increased. 5. In the experimental composites, the flow of resin matrix did not affected on the fracture toughness, even, which was decreased as increase of viscosity. These results showed that the physical properties of a dental composite could be attributed to the flow of resin matrix with relative content of monomers. Specific combination of resin monomers should be designed to fulfil the needs of specific indication for use.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Full CA, and Hollander WR. The composite resin restoration. A literature review part Ill. What the future holds. J Dent Child, 60: 53-58. 1993
  2. Ferracane JL. Using posterior composites appropriately. J Am Dent Asso. 123: 53-58. 1992
  3. Phillips RW. Skinner's science of dental materials. 7th edition. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders Co.. 1973
  4. Asmussen E. and Peutzfeldt A. Mechanical properties of heat-treated restorative resin for use in the inlayIonlay technique. Scand J Dent Res, 98: 564-567, 1990
  5. Peutzfeldt A. and Asmussen E. Influence of aldehydes on selected mechanical properties of resin composites. J Dent Res. 71: 1522-1524. 1992 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345920710081101
  6. Peutzfeldt A. and Asmussen E. In vitro wear. hardness and conversion of diacetyl-containing and propanalcontaining resin materials. Dent Mater. 12: 103-108, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(96)80076-5
  7. Ruyter IE. Monomer systems and polymerization. In posterior composites resin dental restorative materials. Vanherle & Smith eds. Pp 109-135 Utrecht. The Netherlands. P Szulo Publishing. 1985
  8. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci. 105: 97-116. 1997 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1997.tb00188.x
  9. Kaye GWC, and Laby TH. Tables of physical and chemical constants and some mathematical functions. 12th edition. London: Longmans. Green & Co., 1959: 37
  10. Asmussen E. Penetration of restorative resins into acid etched enamel ( I ). Acta Odontol Scand. 35: 175-182, 1977 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357709004652
  11. Ruyter IE, and Oysaed H. Composites for use in posterior teeth: Composition and conversion. J Biomed Mater Res, 21: 11-23,1987 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820210107
  12. Glenn JF. Composition and properties of unfilled and composite resin restorative materials. In: Smith DC, Williams DF (eds): Biocompatibility of dental materials. vol. Ill. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press Inc.. 98-130
  13. Indrani DJ. Cook WD, Televantos F, Tyas MJ, and Harcourt JK. Fracture toughness of water- aged resin composite restorative materials. Dent Mater, 11: 201-207. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80019-0
  14. Olea N, Pulgar R. Perez P. Pea-Serrano F. Rivas A. Novillo-Fertrell A. Pedraza V. Soto A. and Sonnenschein C. Estrogenicity of resin-based composites and sealants used in dentistry. Environ Health Perspect, 104: 298-305, 1996 https://doi.org/10.2307/3432888
  15. Ruyter IE, and Svendsen SA. Remaining methacrylate groups in composite restorative materials. Acta Odontol Scand, 36: 75-82. 1978 https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357809027569
  16. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil, 21: 441-452. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1994.tb01158.x
  17. Ferracane JL, and Greener EH. The effect of resin formulation on the degree of conversion and mechanical properties of dental restorative resins. J Biomed Mater Res, 20: 121-131. 1986 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820200111
  18. Asmussen E. Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs. quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res. 90: 484-489. 1982
  19. Kelly JR. Perspectives on strength. Dent Mater, 11: 103-110. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80043-3
  20. Beaumont PWR. and Young RJ. Slow crack growth in acrylic bone cement. J Biomed Mater Res, 9: 423-439. 1975 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820090506
  21. Mecholsky JJ. Fracture mechanics principles. Dent Mater. 11: 111-112.1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(95)80044-1
  22. Griffith AA, The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Phil Trans Series A. 221: 163-198,1920
  23. Hertzberg RW. Deformation and fracture mechanics of engineering materials. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 274-283. 1989
  24. Tyas MJ. Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in class N cavities. Aust Dent J, 35(1): 46-49, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1990.tb03027.x
  25. Mazer RB. Leinfelder KF, and Russell CM. Degradation of microfilled posterior composite. Dent Mater. 8(3): 185-189, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(92)90080-V
  26. Knibbs PJ. and Smart ER. The clinical performance of a posterior composite resin restorative material. J Oral Rehabil. 19(3): 231-237. 1992
  27. Stangel I. and Barolet RY. Clinical evaluation of two posterior composite resins. J Oral Rehabil. 17(3): 257-268, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1990.tb00007.x
  28. ASTM Standard E 399-83. Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials. In: 1984 Annual book of ASTM standard, Philadelphia: ASTM: 592-622, 1984
  29. Ferracane JL. Antonio RC, and Matsumoto H. Variables affecting the fracture toughness of dental composites. J Dent Res, 66(6): 1140-45.1987 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345870660060901
  30. Ferracane JL. In vitro evaluation of composite resins. Structure-property relationships. Trans Acad Dent Mater. 2:6-35, 1989
  31. Feilzer AJ. Dooren LH. De Gee AJ. and Davidson CL. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. Eur J Oral Sci, 103: 322-326. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.1995.tb00033.x
  32. Asmussen E. and Peutzfeldt A. Influence of UEDMA. Bis-GMA and TEGDMA on selected mechanical properties of experimental resin composites. Dent Matel; 14(1): 51-6 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(98)00010-4
  33. Tarumi H. Imazato S. Ehara A, Kato S. Ebi N. and Ebisu S. Post-irradiation polymerization of composites containing Bis-GMA and TEGDMA. Dent Mater. 15(4): 238-242. 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00040-8
  34. Braem M. Ringer W. van Doren V. Lambrechts P. and Vanherle G. Mechanical properties and filler fraction of dental composites. Dent Mater. 5: 346-349. 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90128-0
  35. Lloyd CH. and Mitchell L : The fractme toughness of tooth coloured restorative materials. J Oral Rehabil. 11: 257-272. 1984 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1984.tb00575.x
  36. Kim KH. Park JH. Imai Y. and Kishi T. Microfracture mechanisms of dental resin composites containing spherically-shaped filler particles. J Dent Res. 73(2): 499-504. 1994
  37. Ferracane JL. and Berge HX. Fracture toughness of experimental dental composites aged in ethanol. J Dent Res. 74(7): 1418-1423. 1995
  38. Young RJ. and Beaumont PWR. Failure of brittle polymers by slow crack growth. Part 2. Failure processes in a silica particle-filled epoxy resin composite. J Mater Sci. 10: 1343-1350. 1975 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00540824
  39. Eliades GC. Vougiouklakis GJ. and Caputo AA. Degree of double bond conversion in light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 3: 19-25. 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(87)80055-6
  40. Yoshida K, and Greener EH. Effects of two amine reducing agents on the degree of conversion and physical properties of an unfilled light-cured resin. DentMaier, 9(4): 246-251. 1993
  41. Yoshida K. and Greener EH. Effect of photoinitiator on degree of conversion of unfilled light-cured resin. J Dent, 22(5): 296-299. 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(94)90064-7
  42. Kawaguchi M. Fukushima T. and Miyazaki K. The relationship between cure depth and transmission coefficient of visible-light-activated resin composites. J Dent Res, 73(2): 516-521. 1994
  43. Beatty MW. Swartz ML. Moore BK. Phillips RW. and Roberts TA. Effect of crosslinking agent content. monomer functionality. and repeat unit chemistry on properties of unfilled resins. J BiomedMater Res, 27(3): 403-413. 1993 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820270314
  44. Rueggeberg FA. and Jordan DM. Effect of light- tip distance on polymerizat.ion of resin composite. Int J Prosthodont, 6(4): 364-367. 1993
  45. Lovell LG. Newman SM. and Bowman CN. The effects of light intensity. temperature. and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res, 78(8): 1469-1476. 1999 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780081301
  46. Davidson CL. and Feilzer AJ. Polymerization shrinkage and polymerization shrinkage stress in polymerbased restoratives. J Dent. 25(6): 435-440. 1997
  47. Choi KK. Condon JR. and Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res, 79(3): 812-817. 2000 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345000790030501
  48. Davidson-Kaban SS. Davidson CL. Feilzer AJ. De Gee AJ. and Erdilek N. The effect of curing light variations of bulk curing and wall-to-wall quality of two types and various shades of resin composites. Dent Mater. 13: 344-352. 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(97)80105-4
  49. Sakaguchi RL. and Berge HX. Reduced light energy density decreased post-gel contraction while maintaining degree of conversion in composites. J Dent. 26: 695-700. 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00048-1
  50. Silikas N. and Watts DC. Rheology of urethane dimethacrylate and diluent formulations. Dent Mater, 15(4): 257-261. 1999 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(99)00043-3
  51. Germain H ST. ML Swartz. RW Phillips. BK Moore. and TA Roberts. Properties of rnicrofilled composite resins as influenced by filler content. J Dent Res. 64: 155-160. 1985 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345850640021301
  52. Ferracane JL. Condon JR. and Suh B. Effect of filler on degree of conversion (DC) of resins. J Dent Res (abstract). 71: 598. 1992
  53. Asmussen E. Clinical relevance of physical. chemical. and bonding properties of composite resins. Oper Dent. 10: 61-73. 1985
  54. Ferracane JL. Mitchem JC. Condon JR. and Todd R. Wear and marginal breakdown of composites with various degrees of cure. J Dent Res 76(8): 1508-1516
  55. Jones DW. and Rizkalla AS. Characterization of experimental composite biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res. 33: 89-100. 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199622)33:2<89::AID-JBM5>3.0.CO;2-H

피인용 문헌

  1. Self-adhesion of low-viscosity composites to dentin surface vol.28, pp.3, 2003, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2003.28.3.209
  2. The study of fractural behavior of repaired composite vol.35, pp.6, 2010, https://doi.org/10.5395/JKACD.2010.35.6.461