DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE WITH RETROGRADE FILLING MATERIALS IN BLOOD CONTAMINATION USING FLUID TRANSPORT MODEL

Fluid transport model을 이용한 치근단 역충전 재료의 혈액오염시 미세누출평가

  • Ahn, Hyo-Soon (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jang, In-Ho (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Se-Joon (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Lee, Kwang-Won (Department of Conservative Dentistry & Institute for Oral Bioscience, College of Dentistry, Chonbuk National University)
  • 안효순 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 장인호 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이세준 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소) ;
  • 이광원 (전북대학교 치과대학 치과보존학교실 및 구강생체과학연구소)
  • Published : 2002.01.01

Abstract

Leakage studies have been performed frequently, since a fluid-tight seal provided by various dental fill-ing materials has been considered clinically important. The leakage of the various root-end filling materials has been widely investigated mostly dye penetration method. These dye studies cannot offer any information about the quality of the seal of a test material over a long period of time The purpose of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of root end cavities in blood contamination filed amalgam, intermediate restorative material(IRM), light cured glass ionomer cement(GI) and mineral trioxide aggregate(MTA) by means of a modified fluid transport model. Fifty standard human root sections, each 5mm high and with a central pulp lumen of 3mm in diameter, were and filled with our commonly used or potential root end fill ing materials after they were contaminated with blood. At 24h. 72h, 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after filling, leakage along these filling materials was determined under a low pressure of 10KPa(0.1atm) using a fluid transport model. The results were as follows : 1 MTA group showed a tendency of decreasing percent of gross leakage (20m1/day) in process of time, whereas the other materials showed a tendency of increasing in the process time. 2. At the all time interval, GI group leaked significantly less than amalgam group and IRM group (p<0.05). 3. At the 4 weeks, the percentage of gross leakage in MTA group decreased to 0% thereafter, the low per-centage of gross leakage was maintained in MTA group until the end of the experiment, whereas the percentage in IRM group increased to 100% 4. At the 12 weeks, percentage of gross leakage was significantly low in MTA group(0%), comparison with GI group(40%), amalgam group(90%) and IRM group(100%), but there was no significant difference between latter two materials.

Keywords

References

  1. Sjiigrem U, Hagglund B. Sundqvist G. Wing K.: Factors affecting the long term results of endodontic treatment. J Endodon 16: 498-504. 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(07)80180-4
  2. Ingle. J. I. and Backland. L. K.: Endodontics, 4th ed, Lea & Febiger Book. Philadelphia 689-763, 1994
  3. Baumgartner J. C. and Galkler, W. A.: Bacteria in the apical 5mm of infected root canals. J. Endodont, 17: 380-383. 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81989-8
  4. Harty FJ. Parkins BJ. Wengrat AM: The success rate of Apicoectomy, A retrospective study of 1016 case. Br. Dent. J. 129: 407-418, 1970 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802595
  5. Gartner A and Dorn S: Advances in endodontic surgery. Dent Clin North Am 36: 357-78, 1992
  6. 조용범, 홍찬의, 신동훈 : 수종 치근단 역충전재가 치근단 조직함유에 미치는 영향. 대한치과보존학회지, 20(1): 17-32. 1995
  7. Rud J, Andreason JO, Jensen JEM: Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery. Int J Oral Surg 1: 195-214, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(72)80013-9
  8. Dorn SO, Gartner A.: Retrofilling materials: a retrospective success-failure study of amalgam, EBA. and IRM. J Endodon 16: 391-3, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81912-6
  9. Frank AL, Click DH, Paterson SS and Weine FS: Long-term evaluation of surgically placed amalgam fillings. J Endodon 18: 391-8, 1992 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81226-4
  10. Rapp EL, Grown CE, Newton CW: An analysis of success and failure of apicoectomies. J Endodon 17: 508-12, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81800-5
  11. Smee G, Bolanos OR, Morse DR, Furst MF, Yesilsoy C.: A comparative leakage study of P-30 resin bonded ceramic, Teflon, amalgam, and IRM as retrofilling seals. J Endodon 13:117-21. 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80177-2
  12. Smee G, Bolanos OR, Morse DR, Furst MF, Yesilsoy C.: A comparative leakage study of P-30 resin bonded ceramic, Teflon, amalgam, and IRM as retrofilling seals. J Endodon 13:117-21. 1987 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(87)80177-2
  13. Wilson AD, Kent BE.: A new translucent cement for dentistry. Br Dent J 132: 133-5, 1972 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802810
  14. Tobias RS, Brows RM., Plant CG, INgram DW.: Pulpal response to a glass ionomer cement. Br Dent J 144:345-50, 1978 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4804092
  15. Pitt Ford TR, Robers GJ: Tissue response to glass ionomer retrograde root fillings. Int Endod 23: 223-8,1990
  16. Abdal Ak, Retief DH: The apical seal via the retrosurgical approach <1. A Preliminary study). Oral Surg 53:614-21. 1982 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(82)90351-6
  17. Ruyter, I.E. and Sjovik, I.J.: Monomer composition of dental composites and sealants, J Dent Res, 57(spec. iss.) :249, abstr. 700, 1978
  18. Rueggeberg, F.A. and Craig, R. G.: Correlation of parameters used to estimate monomer conversion in a light-cured composite. Dent Res., 67:932-937,1998 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670060801
  19. Asmussen, E.: Restorative resins: hardness and strength vs quantity of remaining double bonds. Scand J Dent Res 90: 484-89, 1982
  20. Blackman R. Gross M, Seltzer S: An Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a glass ionomor-silver cement in rat connective tissue. J Endodon 15: 76-9, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(89)80112-8
  21. Pissiotis E, Sapounas G, Spangborg LSW: Silver glass ionomer cement as a retrograde filling material : a study in vitro. J Endodon 17:225-9, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81926-6
  22. Christopher F. Bates, David L. Carnes, Barlos E. del Rio: Longitudinal sealing ability of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material
  23. Torabinejad M, Watson TF, Pitt Ford TR.: Sealing ability of a mineral trioxide aggregate when used as a root end filling material. J Endodon 19:591-5,1993 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80271-2
  24. Torabinejad M, Dby We, Naidorf IJ: Inflammatory and immunological aspects of the pathogenesis of human periapical lesions. J Endodon 11:479-88,1985 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(85)80221-1
  25. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR, Kettering JD: Cytotoxiciy of four root end filling materials on mouse L929 cells. J Endodon 19:203, 1993
  26. Hong Cu, McKendry DJ, Pitt Ford TR. Torabinejad M: Healing of furcal lesions repaired by amalgam or mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endodon 29: 197, 1994
  27. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Kettering JD: Antibacterial effects of some root end filling materials J Endodon 19:200, 1993
  28. Mahmoud Torabinejad, Robert K. Higa, Douglas J. McKendry, and Thomas R. Pitt Ford.: Dye leakage of four root end filling materials: Effects of blood contamination J Endodon 20(4): 159-63, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80326-2
  29. Pashley DB. Thompson SM., Stewart FP.: Dentin permeability: effects of temperature on hydraulic conductance. J Dent Res 62:956-9, 1983 https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620090801
  30. Wu M-K. De Gee AJ, Wesselink PR.: Leakage of four root canal sealers at different thicknesses. Int Endod J 27: 304-8, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00273.x
  31. Derkson GD, Pashley DB. Derkson ME.: Microleakage measurement of selected restorative materials: a new in vitro method. J Prosthet Dent56:435-40, 1986 https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90384-7
  32. King KT, Anderson RW, Pashley DH, Pantera EA.: Longitudinal evaluation of the seal of endodontic retrofillings. J Endodon16:307-10, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81939-4
  33. Trowbridge HO, Kim S.: Pulp development, structure and function. Pathways of the pulp. 6th ed. St. Louis, Mosby, 322-5, 1994
  34. Min-Kai Wu, Evangelos G. Kontakiotis, Paul R. Wesselink.: Long-term seal provided by some root-end filling materials. J Enoddon 1998 : 24(8) 557-560 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80077-0
  35. M.-K. Wu, E.G .. Kontakiotis, P. R. Wesselink.: Decoloration of 1% methylene blue solution in contact with dental filling materials. J Dentistry 26: 585-589, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(97)00040-7
  36. Philips RW.: Skinner's science of dental materials. 7th. ed. Philadelphia WB b Saunders. 1973
  37. P. D. Callis, G. Mannan.: Microleakage of retrograde fillings: assessment using a novel measurement system. J Endodon 20(1):555-57, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80072-5
  38. Inose S, Yoshimura M, Tinkle JS, Marshall FJ.: A 24week study of the microleakage of four retrofilling materials using a fluid filtration method. J Endodon 17:369-75,1991 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81987-4
  39. Kent BE, Lewis BG, Wilson AD.: The properties of glass ionomer cement. Br. Dent J 135: 322-6, 1973 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4803083
  40. Rahmat A, Barkhordar, Roger B, Pe!zner, Marvin M. Stark, Fran.: Use of glass ionomers as retrofilling materials Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 67: 734-9, 1989 https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90017-0
  41. Stephan Roth.: A laboratory study of glass ionomsr cement as a retrograde filling material. Australian Dental J 36(5): 384-90, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1834-7819.1991.tb01362.x
  42. B. S. Chong, T. R. Pitt Ford, F. F. Watson, R.F. Wilson.: Sealing ability of potential retrograde root filling materials. Endod Dent Traumatol 11: 264-69, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-9657.1995.tb00501.x
  43. Per Jesslen, Lars Zetterqvist, and Ander Hsimdahl. Huddinge. Sweden.: Long-term results of amalgam versus glass ionomer cement as apical sealant after apicectomy. Oral Pathol Oral Radilol Endod 79: 101-3, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(05)80082-4
  44. Torabinejad M, Rastegar AF, Kettering JD, Pitt Ford TR.: Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material. J Endodon 21: 109-12, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80433-4
  45. Kettering JD, Torabinejad M.: Investigation of mutagenicity of mineral trioxide aggregate and other commonly used root-end filling materials. J Endodon 21 :537-42, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80980-5
  46. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Lee SJ, Monsef M, Pitt Ford TR.: Investigation of mineral trioxide aggregate for root-end filling in dogs. J Endodon 21 :603-8, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81112-X
  47. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. McKendry DJ, Abedi HR. Miller DA, Kariyawasam SP.: Histologic assessment of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling in monkeys. J Endodon 23: 225-8, 1997 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(97)80051-9
  48. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, Pitt Ford TR. Kariyawasam SP.: Tissue reaction to implanted SuperEBA and mineral trioxide aggregate in the mandible of guinea pigs: a preliminary report. J Endodon 21: 569-71. 1995 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(06)80987-8
  49. Torabinejad M, Pitt Ford TR. Abedi HR. Tang HM.: Tibia and mandible reaction to implanted root-end filling material. J Endodon 23: 263, 1997
  50. Koh ET, Pitt Ford TR. Torabinejad M, McDonald F.: Mineral trioxide aggregate stimulates cytokine production in human osteoblasts. J Bone Min Res 10S: S406, 1995
  51. Koh ET, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Torabinejad M.: Cellular response to Mineral trioxide aggregate. J Endodon 24: 543-7, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-2399(98)80074-5