A Study on the Development of the Korean Family Functioning Scale.

한국형 가족 기능 측정 도구 개발을 위한 연구 - 만성질환아 가족을 대상으로 -

  • Published : 2002.06.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop the instrument to measure family functioning for Korean family with a chronic ill child, and to test the validity and reliability of the instrument. Method: The items of instrument were consisted based on researchers' previous study of concept analysis of the Korean family functioning. Twenty six item scale was developed with six domains. In order to test reliability and validity of the scale, data were collected from the 231 families, who have a child with a chronic illness. Data was collected between August and September in 2001 in a General Hospital in Seoul, Korea. Result: The results were as follows: As a result of the item analysis, 24 items were selected from the total of 26 items, excluding items with low correlation with total scale. Six factors were evolved by factor analysis. Six factors explained 61.4% of the total variance. The first factor 'Affective bonding' explained 15.4%, 2nd factor 'External relationship' 11.8%, 3rd factor 'Family norm' 10.5%, 4th factor 'Role and responsibilities' 8.3%, 5th factor ' Communication' 7.9%, and the 6th factor 'Financial resource' explained 7.3%. Cronbach's $\alpha$ coefficient of this scale was .87 and Guttman spilt- half coefficient was .84. Conclusion: The study support the reliability and validity of the scale. There were distinct differences in dimensions of family functioning scales developed in the U. S.

Keywords

References

  1. Bae, J. M., & Kim, Y. J. (1994). Validity and reliability of FACE III when applied to the one of the family members. J Korean Acad Fam Med 15(6), 312-321
  2. Blank, J. J., Clark, L., Longman, A. J. & Atwood, J. R (1989). Perceived home needs of cancer patients and their caregivers. Cancer Nursing, 12, 78-84
  3. Cho, H (1992). The Family as eviroment of nursing. Unpublished manuscript. Ewha Womens University, Seoul, Korea
  4. EPstein, N. B., Baldwin, L M, & Bishop, D. S.(1981). The McMaster Family Assessment Device, Version 3, copyright registration number 82-315
  5. Epstein, N. Baldwin, L, & Bishop, D. (1983). The McMaster Family Assessmait Device, Journal of Marital & Family Therapy, 9, 171-180
  6. Jang, S. O. (1998). An analysis of family nursing research in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs, 28(1), 104- 116
  7. Kang, B. S., Serk, K S., & Oh, Y. J. (1993) SPSS/PC + for statistical analysis. Seoul : Trade Management Press
  8. Kim, S. J., Lee, C. S., Lee, G. H, Kang, J, W., Park, C. W., & Park, Y. R (1994). Family function of extended family and nuclear family using FACES III. J Korean Acad Fam Med 15, 648-655
  9. Kim, I. S., Lee, S. H, Lee, K. M., Kim, S. Y., & Jung, S. P. (1993). The difference of marriage - satisfaction score among family groups according to the family APGAR score and family adaptability cohesion evaluation scale. J korean Acad Fam Med, 14, 797-803
  10. Kim, J. E. (1996). The Change of family funtion in korean family. Paper presented at the meeting for the Opening of the Hanyang University Nursing Research Center, Seoul
  11. Lee. K T. (1991). The Structure of consciousness of the korean people. Seoul, Shinwon Publishing Company
  12. Lee, E. O., Hesook Suzie Kim, Park, Y. S., Song, M, Lee, I., & Park, Y, H. (1999) Model development of change of family funtioning with chronic illness. J Korean Acad Nurs, 29(3), 467-484
  13. Lee. E. O., Lim, N. Y., & Park, H. A. (1998). Statistical analysis and nursing . medical research Seoul : Soomoon Publishing Company
  14. Moos, R (1974). Family Environment Scales, Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press
  15. Olson, D.H, Bell, R, & Portner, J. (1980). Family adaptability and cohesion evaluation-scales, St. Paul, MN:University of Minnesota press
  16. Pless, I. B., Satterwhite, B. (1973). A measure of family functioning and its application, Social Science and Medicine, 7, 613-621
  17. Smilkstein, G. (1978). The family APGAR: A proposal for a family function test and its use by physicians, Journal of Family Practice, 6, 416-436
  18. Steinhauer, P., Santa-Barbara, J., & Skinner, H (1982). The process model of family functioning. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, in press
  19. Van der Veen, F. (1960) Family concept Q sort. Madison, Wisconsin ; Dane County Mental Health Center, unpublished
  20. Van der Veen, F., (1969). Family Concept Inventory. Unpublished manuscript, Institute for Juvenile Research, Chicago
  21. Waltz, C. F., Bausell, R. B. (1981) Nursing research . design . statistics and computer analysis. F. A. Davis company philadelphia
  22. Yu, D. K, & Kwon, Y. S. (1997). SPSSWIN for statistical analysis. Seoul. Keehanjae