에너지공학 (Journal of Energy Engineering)

  • 제11권4호
  • /
  • Pages.332-341
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1598-7981(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-7074(eISSN)
한국에너지학회 (The Korean Society for Energy)
권호 표지

$원자력시설^{[1]}$ 및 정책의 수용성에 영향을 미치는 인식인자 도출에 관한 이론적 고찰

A Theoretical Approach to Derive Perception Indicators Influencing the Acceptability on Nuclear Energy Facilities & Policies

  • 조성경 (아주대학교 에너지학과) ;
  • 오세기 (아주대학교 에너지학과)
  • 발행 : 2002.11.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 고에서는 이론적 접근을 바탕으로 원자력정책 수용성에 대한 직접적인 영향인자로서 원자력에 대한 인식을 도출하였다 이는 원자력의 필요성, 기대편익 및 비용, 통제가능성, 체감위험수위, 미래세대와의 공평성에 대한 인식을 의미한다. 또한 원자력 인식에 대한 영향요인 즉 원자력정책 수용성에 대한 간접적인 영향인자로서 지식과 신뢰를 도출하였다. 원자력에 대한 지식은 정보와 교육, 홍보, 미디어 및 경험 등을 통한 사실에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 이루어진다. 한편, 원자력정책에 대한 신뢰는 현실에 대한 가치판단으로서 정당성, 커뮤니케이션, 보상, 참여 그리고 미디어를 통해 구성된다 원자력정책 수용성에 대한 다차원적이고 입체적인 분석은 보다 현실적이고 합의적인 정책개발 및 현안 해결의 실마리를 제공할 수 있을 것이다

This Paper discusses a theoretical approach to assess the acceptability on nuclear energy facili-ties and policies, that is associated with derivation of indicators influencing perception on the nuclear energy. Facets of the public perception include the necessity of nuclear energy, expected benefits and costs, possi-bility of control, nuclear energy risk sentiment level, and equality between present and future generations. It also identifies indicators directly or indirectly affecting the perception facets and classifies them into the knowledge-based and the trust-based. Knowledge on nuclear energy facility is acquired on the foundation of the understanding of fact, through information, education, PR, and experience the media. Meanwhile, trust on nuclear energy Policies as value judgment on reality is built through legitimacy, communication, compensa-tion, participation, and the media. Multi-dimensional analysis on nuclear energy acceptability will provide a key to developing a more realistic and mutually agreeable policies and solving the imminent issues.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Risk, Uncertainty, and Rational Action Carlo, C;Jaeger;Ortwin Renn;Eugene A. Rosa;Thomas Webler
  2. The Perception of Risk Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield Paul Slovic
  3. Risk Analysis v.5 Powerline frequency electric and magnetic fields: A pilot study of risk perception Morgan, M.G.;Slovic, P.;Nair, I.;Geisler, D.;MacGregor, D.G.;Fischhoff, B.;Lincoln, D.;Florig, K.
  4. Perilous Progress: Technology as Hazard Characterizing Perceived Risk Paul Slovic;B. Fischhoft;S. Lichtenstein;R.W. Kates(ed.);C. Hohenemser(ed.);J.X. Kasperson(ed.)
  5. Future Risks and Risk Management Perception of Risk: Paradox and Challenger Paul Slovis;B. Brehmer(ed.);N.E. Sahlin(ed.)
  6. Risk Analysis, Perception, and Management Risk Perception Pidgeon, N.;Hood, C.;Jones, D.;Turner, B.;Gibson, R.;G. Royal Society Study(ed.)
  7. The Perception of Risk Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics and Science: Surveying the Risk-assessment Battlefield Paul Slovic
  8. Risk Analysis and Risk Management in an Uncertain World Howard Kunreuther
  9. Risk, Media and Stigma Technological Stigma Robin Gregory;James Flynn;Paul Slovic;James Flynn(ed.);Paul Slovic(ed.);Howard Kunreuther(ed.)
  10. Risk, Media, and Stigma Stigma and the Social Amplification of Risk: Toward a Framework of Analysis Roger E. Kasperson;Nayna Jhaveri;Jeanne X. Kasperson;James Flynn(ed.);Paul Slovic(ed.);Howard Kunreuther(ed.)
  11. Risk, Media, and Stigma Risk Media, and Stigma at Rocky Flats James Flynn;Ellen Peters;C.K. Mertz;Paul Slovic;James Flynn(ed.);Paul Slovic(ed.);Howard Kunreuther(ed.)
  12. Societal risk Assessment: How Safe is Enough? Slovic, P.;Fischhoff, B.;Lichtenstein, S.;R.C. Schwing(ed.);W.A. Albers, Jr.(ed.)
  13. The Perception of Risk Baruch Fischhoff;Paul Slovic;Sarah Lichtenstein;Stephen Read;Barbara combs;Paul Slovic(ed.)
  14. Risk, Media and Stigma Perceived Risk, Stigma and Potential Economic Impacts of High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada Paul Slovic;Mark Layman;Nancy Kraus;James Flynn;James Chalmers;Gail Gesell;James Flynn(ed,);Paul Slovic(ed.);Howard Kunreuther(ed.)
  15. Nuclear Power, Energy and the Environment Peter E Hodgson
  16. Harvard Environment Law Review v.6 Issues of Federalism in Hazardous Waste Control: Cooperation ro Confusion? K.L. Florini
  17. Laerence Bacow and Debra Snderson: Facility Siting and Public Opposition O'Hare Michael
  18. Progress in Planning v.35 The Siting of Locally Unwanted Land Uses: Toward a Cooperative Approach A.M. Armour
  19. A Perspective on Technocracy and Democracy Growth and Change v.22 no.2 Spring High-Level Nuclear Waste Disposal Malone, Charles R.
  20. Environmental Policy in the 1990s The NIMBY Syndrome: Facility Siting and the Failure of Democratic Discourse Mazmanian, Daniel;Divid Morell;Norman J Vig(ed.);Michael E Kraft(ed.)
  21. The Western Political Quarterly v.6 Citizen Participation and the NIMBY Syndrome: Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal Michael E. Kraft;Bruce C. Clary
  22. The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository Doulas Easterling;Howard Kunreuther
  23. Risk Analysis v.5 Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability Starr, C.
  24. Risk Analysis and Risk Management in an Uncertain World Howard Kunreuther
  25. Risk Analysis v.11 no.4 Knowledge and Risk Perception among Nuclear Power Plant Employees Sjoberg, L.;Drottz-Sjoberg, B.
  26. The Perception of Risk Perception of Risk from Radiation Paul Slovic;Paul Slovic(ed.)
  27. Basic and Applied Social Psychology v.7 no.1 Construction of a Nuclear Power Station in One's Locality: Attitudes and Science Van der Plight J.;Eiser, J.R.;Spears, R.
  28. Public Policy v.28 no.22 Congress, regulation and the Decline of Nuclear Power Barry R. Weinfgast
  29. Draft final report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force on Radioactive Management Facilities US Department of Energy
  30. Final Report of the Secretary of Energy Advisory Board Task Force in Radioactive Waste Management Earing Public Trust and Confidence: Requisite for Managing Radioactive Wastes U.S. Deparment of Energy
  31. A Mental Models Approach Risk Communication M. Granger Morgan;Baruch Fischhoff;Ann Bostrom;Cynthia J. Atman
  32. The Perception of Risk Informing and Education the Public about Risk Paul Slovic;Paul Slovic(ed.)
  33. Public Opinion Quarterly v.58 Three Decades of Public Opinion Rogers, E.;Dunlap, R.