Dose-related Effects of Follicle Stimulating Hormone on Superovulation in Indigenous Cows of Bangladesh

  • Hossein, M.S. (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Shamsuddin, M. (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Bhuiyan, M.M.U. (Department of Theriogenology & Biotechnology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Seoul National University) ;
  • Khan, A.H.M.S.I. (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Bari, F.Y. (Department of Surgery and Obstetrics, Faculty of Veterinary Science, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
  • Published : 2002.08.01

Abstract

The present study aimed at determining the effective dose of Folltropin, a follicle timulating hormone (FSH), on superovulation in indigenous cows of Bangladesh. Fifteen regularly cycling 5~7 years old dry cows, weighing 200~250 kg with 2.5~3.0 body condition scores (BCS) were divided into three groups (n=5). Individual groups were superovulated with 100, 200 or 300 mg of Folltropin per animal. The superovulation treatment was initiated at Day 10 or Day 11 of the estrous cycle (Day 0=day of estrus). Alfaprostol (6 mg) was injected to each cow 72 h after the initiation of superovulation treatment to induce eestrus. After confirming standing estrus, the cows were inseminated 2~3 times, 12 h apart, depending on the duration of estrus. At Day 6 or Day 7, individual horns of the uterus were flushed with 150~200 $m\ell$ of phosphate buffered saline supplemented with BSA (0.2%), penicillin (100 IU/$m\ell$) and streptomycin (100 $\mu\textrm{g}$$m\ell$) using a two-way foley catheter. The embryos were concentrated, removing the excess medium through an embryo filter, and identified under a stereomicroscope. The identified embryos were collected, washed four times, evaluated and graded as excellent, good, fair or poor. The excellent, good and fair embryos were considered as transferable quality embryos. The mean (range). numbers of embryos collected vs. transferable quality embryos far 100, 200 and 300 mg of Folltropin were 4.5 (1~10) vs. 3.5 (1~8); 2.5 (1~4) vs. 1 (0~2) and 0.0 (0~0) vs. 0.0 (0~0), respectively, Folltropin at a dose of 100 or 200 mg produced suitable ovarian stimulation for superovulation in indigenous zebu cows of Bangladesh. A dose of 300 mg or more Folltropin consistently caused preovulatory corpora lutea formation in the ovaries and resulted in zero embryo recovery.

Keywords

References

  1. Anon 1996. SYSTAT(R), version 6.1 for Windows(R). SPSS Inc., Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL., pp 19-182
  2. Boland MP, Goulding D and Roche JF. 1991. Alternative gonadotrophins for superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology, 35:5-17 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90143-2
  3. Breuel KF, Baker RD, Butcher RL, Townsend EC, Inskeep EK and Dailey RA. 1991. Effect of breed, age of donor and dosage of follicle stimulating hormone on the superovulatory response of beef cows. Theriogenology, 36:241-255 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90383-O
  4. Chupin D, Combarnous Y and Procurer R. 1984. Antagonistic effect of LH on FSH induced superovulation in cattle. Theriogenology, 21:229 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(84)90329-7
  5. Chupin D, Combarnous Y and Procurer R. 1985. Different effect of LH on FSH induced superovulation in two breeds of cattle. Theriogenology, 23:184 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(85)90090-1
  6. Elsden RP, Nelson LD and Seidel GEJr. 1978. Superovulation cows with follicle stimulating hormone and pregnant mare's serum gonadotrophin. Theriogenology, 9:17-26 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(78)90049-3
  7. FAO. 1991. Superovulation. In: Training manual for embryo transfer in cattle. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper 77. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di caracalla, Rome, Italy. pp 27-32
  8. Fernandez M, Sanchez L, Alvarez FS, Vazquez C and Iglesias A. 1993. Superovulation in Rubia gallega cows with a single subcutanoeus injection of FSH. Theriogenology, 39:217 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90072-D
  9. Hasler JF, McCauley AD, Schermerhorn EC and Foote RH. 1983. Superovulation responses of Holstein cows. Theriogenology, 19:83-99 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(83)90125-5
  10. Herrler A, Elsaesser F, Parvizi N and Niemann H. 1991. Superovulation of dairy cows with purified FSH supplemented with defined amount of LH. Theriogenology, 35:633-343 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(91)90459-Q
  11. Kafi M and McGowan MR. 1997. Factors associated with variation in the superovulatory response of cattle. Anim. Reprod. Sci., 48:137-157 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(97)00033-X
  12. Khan AHMSI, Hossein MS, Siddiqui MAR, Shamsuddin M, Bhuiyan MMU and Kamaruddin KM. 2000. Dose-specific effects of pregnant mare serum gonadotrophin on the embryo production in Bangladeshi zebu cows. Bangladesh Vet. J., 17:67-73
  13. Lindner MG and Wright JrW. 1983. Bovine embryo morphology and evaluation. Theriogenology, 20:407-416 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(83)90201-7
  14. Mahmoudzadeh AR. 1994. Cryopreservation of in-vivo and in-vitro produced bovine embryos. Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Obstetrics and Herd Health, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium. pp. 177
  15. Mapletoft JR. 1986. Bovine embryo transfer, In: Current Therapy in Theriogenology. DA Morrow(ed). WB Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 75-78
  16. McGrowan MR, Braithwaite M, Jochle W and Mapletoft RJ. 1985. Superovulation of beef heifers with pergonal (HMG): a dose response trail. Theriogenology, 24:173-174 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(85)90181-5
  17. Monniaux D, Chupin D and Saumande J. 1983. Superovulatory response of cattle. Theriogenology, 19:55-81 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(83)90124-3
  18. Pawlyshyn V, Lindsell CE, Braithwaite M and Mapletoft RJ. 1986. Superovulation of beef cows with FSH-P: A dose-response trail. Theriogenology, 25:179 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(86)90233-5
  19. Siddiqui MAR, Shamsuddin M, Bhuiyan MMU, Akbar MA and Kamaruddin KM. 2002. Effect of feeding and body condition score on multiple ovulation and embryo production in zebu cows. Reprod. Dom. Anim., 37:37-41 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-0531.2002.00329.x
  20. Tribulo H, Jofre F, Carcedo J, Alonson A, Tribulo R and Bo GA. 1993. Superovulation in Bos indicus cattle with a single single subcutaneous injection of commercial pituitary extracts. Theriogenology, 39:331 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90186-9
  21. Walsh JH, Mantovani R, Duby RT, Overstrom EW, Dobrinsky JR, Roche JF and Boland MP. 1993. Supervulatory response in beef heifers following once or twice daily pFSH injection. Theriogenology, 39:335 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(93)90190-G
  22. Wang H, Wu M, Patt D, Murphy BD and Mapletoft RJ. 1988. Superovulation in beef heifers with PMSG. Effects of dose and monoclonal antibodies to PMSG. Theriogenology, 29:323 https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(88)90151-3