Journal of Surface Science and Engineering (한국표면공학회지)

The Korean Institute of Surface Engineering (한국표면공학회)
권호 표지

A Study on the Comparison of Solderability Assessment

  • Salam, B. (University of Salford School of Aero., Civil and Mech. Eng.) ;
  • Ekere, N.N. (University of Salford School of Aero., Civil and Mech. Eng.) ;
  • Jung, J.P. (University of Seoul, Dept. of Material Sci. and Eng.)
  • Published : 2002.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of solderability assessment is to predict the effectiveness of soldering process. It is important for companies pursuing zero defects manufacturing because poor solderability is the major cause of two third of soldering failures. The most versatile solderability method is wetting balance method. However, there exist so many indices for wettability in the wetting balance test e.g. time to reach 2/3 values of maximum wetting force, tine to reach zero wetting force, maximum withdrawal force. In this study, three solderability assessment methods, which were the maximum withdrawal force, the wetting balance and the dynamic contact angle (DCA), were evaluated by comparing each other. The wetting balance technique measures the solderability by recording the forces exerted from the specimen after being dipped into the molten solder. Then the force at equilibrium state can be used to calculate a contact angle, which is known as static contact angles. The DCA measures contact angles occurred during advancing and withdrawing of the specimen and the contact angles are known as dynamic contact angles. The maximum withdrawal force uses the maximum force during withdrawal movement and then a contact angle can be calculated. In this study, the maximum withdrawal force method was found to be an objective index for measuring the solderability and the experiment results indicated good agreement between the maximum withdrawal force and the wetting balance method.

Keywords

References

  1. F.G. Yost, F.M. Hosking, and D.R. Frear, The Mechanics of Solder Alloy Wetting and Spread-ing (1993), NewYork, VanNostrand
  2. D.R. Frear, W.B. Jones, and K.R. Kinsman, Sol derMechanics, (1991), TMS
  3. J. Y. Park, C.S. Kang, and J.P Jung, J. Electron. Mater. 28,1256 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-999-0165-0
  4. J.Y. Park, J.P. Jung, and C.S. Kang, IEEE trans. CPT 22,372 (1999)
  5. J. Y. Park, Doctoral Thesis 67 (2000), Seoul, Se oul National University
  6. G. Takyi, N.N. Ekere, K.G. Snowdon, and C.G Tanner, J. of Electron. Manuf. 9,233 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1142/S0960313199000155
  7. C. Lea, A Scientific Guide to Surface Mount Technology (1988), Electrochemical Publicati-ons
  8. I. Artaki, A.M. Jackson and P.T. Vianco, J. Elec tron.Mater.23,757(1994) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02651370
  9. H. Takao, H. Hasegawa, T. Tsukada, M. Mizuno, K. Yamada, and S. Yamamoto, Proc. 2nd Symp. Microjoining and AssemblyTechnol. in Electron. 101 (Osaka, Japan: JWS 1999)