Abstract
Experiments were carried out to select the rusty tolerance lines in 39 inbred lines of ginseng cultivated in field, among them, 7 lines showed low degree of rusty root while 7 lines showed high degree of rusty root. In order to select marker elements among mineral nutrients for rusty ginseng root, we combined 5 groups as follows : Ⅰ (healthy-root of low rusty degree lines vs. rusty-root of high rusty degree lines), II (healthy-root vs. rusty-root in low rusty degree lines), Ⅲ (healthy-root vs. rusty-root in high rusty degree lines), Ⅳ (low rusty degree lines vs. high rusty degree lines in rusty-root), Ⅴ (low rusty degree lines vs. high rusty degree lines in healthy-root), and analyzed mineral nutrition at different root parts. The contents of mineral nutritions in stele and cortex were not different between healthy lines and rusty lines, and between healthy roots and rusty roots, but that in branch and fine roots were not a tendency. The contents of Fe, Na and Al in epidermis were higher in rusty-root than healthy-root. Also, the contents of Fe and Al in epidermis of high rusty degree lines (HRL) were higher than those of low rusty degree lines (LRL) in healthy-roots and rusty-roots, and so we suggest Fe and Al as markers to select low rusty degree ginseng lines.
고려인삼의 적변내성 계통을 선발하기 위하여 39계통을 포장시험에 공시하여 적변지수가 낮아 적변에 강한 건전계통(LR) 7계통과 적변지수가 높아 적변에 약한 적변계통(HRL)7계통을 선발하였다. 적변내성 인삼 선발을 위한 지표성분으로 무기성분의 가능성을 검토하기 위하여 I(건전계통군의 건전삼과 적변계통군의적변삼 비교), II(건전계통군의 건전삼과 적변삼 비교), III(적변계통군의 건전삼과 적변삼비교), IV(적변삼의 건전계통군과 적변계통군 비교), V(건전삼의 건전계통군과 적변계통군 비교) 5개 조합으로 구성하여 부위별로 무기성분 함량을 비교하였다. 계통군 및 적변지수별 무기성분 함량이 중심주 및 피층조직에서는 유의성이 없었으며, 지세근 조직에서도 일정한 경향이 없었다. 각 계통군내 비교에서 적변인삼은 건전인삼보다 표피조직에서 Fe, Na및 Al함량이 높았다. 표피조직에서 적변계통군(HRL)은 건전계통군(LRL)보다 적변삼이나 건전삼 시료 모두에서 Fe, Al함량이 높아 적변내성 계통 선발 지표성분으로 활용 가능성을 제시한다.