DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparison of Dry Deposition Velocity of Ozone to Aerodynamic Resistance Parameterization

공기역학적 저항 모수화에 따른 오존의 건성침적속도 비교

  • Published : 2002.07.01

Abstract

The aerodynamic resistance($R_a$) to vertical transfer in the surface boundary layer can be formulated in terms of the friction velocity, height of observation, vertical heat flux and surface roughness. Unlike previous studies which focused on the role of $R_c$, present study perform additional tests using a variety of $R_a$ formulae. Several $R_a$ formulations available in the literature, suitable for unstable conditions, were tested for their influence on the dry deposition velocity. The canopy resistance($R_c$) determines the shape of the diurnal pattern, while a small amplitude diurnal cycle in $V_d$ was attributed to the aerodynamic resistance. The aerodynamic resistance is the major contributor to the formation of spikes in nighttime and $R_a$ is relatively important at night because the canopy resistance is smaller. All formulations show similar diurnal cycle and yield good agreement with the observations. Although present $V_d$ formulations are suitable for numerical air qualify models, the research must continue for further improvements in resistance parametrizations.

Keywords

References

  1. 문난경, 1996, 중규모에서의 대기 오염 물질 침적 모델에 관한 연구, 부산대학교 일반대학원 석사학위논문.
  2. Padro, J., H. H. Newmann, and G. D. Hartog, 1991, An investigation of the ADOM dry deposition module using summertime $O_3$ measurements above a deciduous forest. Atmospheric Environment. 25A, 8, 1689-1704.
  3. Padro, J., W. J. Massman, R. H. Shaw, A. Delany, and S. P. Oncley, 1994, A comparison of some aerodynamic resistance methods using measurements over cotton and grass from the 1991 California ozone deposition experiment, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 71, 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00712174
  4. Padro, J., 1996, Summary of ozone dry deposition velocity measurements and model estimates over vineyard, cotton, grass and deciduous forest in summer, Atmospheric Environment, 30, 2363-2369. https://doi.org/10.1016/1352-2310(95)00352-5
  5. Monteith, J. L., 1973, Principles of environmental physics, Arnold London, G.B., 241pp.
  6. Hatfield, J. L., 1983, Evapotranspiration obtained frome remote sensing methods, Adv. Irrig., 2, 395-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-024302-0.50017-5
  7. Choudhury, B. J., R. J. Reginato, and S. B. Idso, 1986, An analysis of infrared temperature observations over wheat and calculation of latent heat flux, Agric. For. Meteorol., 37, 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1923(86)90029-8
  8. 이화운, 김유근, 문난경, 2000, 하계 활엽수림에서의 대기오염물질 건성침착속도의 일변화 추정, 한국기상학회지, 309-316.
  9. Viney, N. R., 1991, An empirical expression for aerodynamic resistance in the unstable boundary layer, Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 56, 381-393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00119213
  10. 박순웅, 1995, 건성 침착이 지상 오염 농도에 미치는 영향, 한국기상학회지, 31, 2, 97-115.
  11. Garratt, J. R., 1992, The Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Cambridge University Press, 316pp.