Empirical Validation of Software Process Maturity on Organizational Performance

SW프로세스 성숙 수준이 기업성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증연구

  • Published : 2002.09.01

Abstract

Recently, increasing attention has been paid to building a successful software process in Information System(IS) implementation. This study establishes software process model as a key predictor of organizational performance. We propose a theoretical framework for capability maturity model derived from the Software Engineering Institute(SEI). This paper identify the process-related variables, financial performance and non-financial performance from the relevant literature and clarify the concept of software process by distinguishing between its component and determinants. We then examine the impact of software process on organizational performance. Hypotheses on software process were tested for 36 enterprises including 118 organizational units. Results indicate that software process capability may serve as a key predictor of organizational performance. Software process maturity found to be positively influenced on the financial and non-financial performance, while investment of information technology as a mediating variable not significantly affected to the performance.

Keywords

References

  1. CMM과 SW 품질경쟁력 이딘형
  2. 한극외국어대학교 박사학윈 논문 소프트웨어 프로세스 성숙도가 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구 이상엽
  3. 정보과학회지 v.17 no.1 CMM과 프로세스 개선 사례 정학종;김도균;박남직
  4. 특집-98 IT벤치마크 분야별 분석결과 전자신문
  5. IEEE Transaction on Software Engineering A Methodology for Collecting Valid Software Engineering Data Badili V.R.;Weiss, D.A.
  6. Software Process Improvement and Practice Return on Investment Measured by US Industry Brodman, J.G.;Johnson;Johnson, D.L.
  7. The Information Appliance Business Week
  8. Ph.D. paper The Effects of Software Development Effort Clark, B.K.
  9. Notes from Tutorial given at the Seventh Software Engineering Process Group Conference Building a Cost-Benefit Case for Software Process Improvement Curtis, W.
  10. Journal of Management Information Systems v.12 no.3 Software Process and Project Performance Deephouse, C.;Mukhopadhyay, T.;Goldenson, D.R.;Kellner, M.I.
  11. IEEE-Report No. 029.98/E, ISERN-98-15 Success or Failure? Modelling the Likelihood of Software Precess Improvement Emam E.;goldenson, D.;McCurley, J.;Herbsleb, J.
  12. CMU/SEI-95-TR-09 After the Appraisal : A Systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, amd Factors the Infruence Success Goldenson, D.R.;Herbsleb, J.D.
  13. IEEE Software Process Improvement v.13 no.2 Raytheon's Experience in Software Process Improvement Haley, T.J.
  14. Management Science v.46 no.4 Effects of Process Maturity on Quality, Cycle Time and Efforts in Software Product Development Harter, D.E.;Krishnan, M.S.;Slaughter, S.A.
  15. CMU/SEI-94-TR-013 Benefit of CMM-Based Software Process Improvement : Initial Results Herbsleb, J.;Carleton, A.;Rozmm, J.;Siegel, J.;Zubrow, D.
  16. Communication of the ACM v.40 no.6 Software Quality and the Capability Maturity Model Herbsleb, J.;Zubrow, D.;Goldenson, D.;Hayes, W.;Paulk, M.
  17. IEEE Software v.8 no.4 Software Process Improvement at Hughes Aircraft Humphrey, W.;Synder, T.R.;Willis R.R.
  18. Glasgow White Paper IEEE Software Engineering Project Management : Core of Knowledge Hunter, R.
  19. IEEE-STD-610 ANSI/IEEE Std IEEE Standard Glossary of Software Engineering Terminology
  20. Manamenent Science v.43 no.4 Th Performance Effects of Process Management Techniques Ittner, C.D.;Larcker, D.F.
  21. Harvard Business Review Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work Kaplan, R.S.;D.P. Norton
  22. Management Science v.46 no.6 An Empirical Analysis of Productivity and Quality in Software Products Krishnan, M.S.;Kriebel, C.H.;Kekre, S.;Mukhopadhyay, T.
  23. Software Process Newsletter no.7 A Correlational Study fo the CMM and Software Development Performance Lawlis, P.K.;Flowe, R.M.;Thordahl, J.B.
  24. A DACS State-of-the-Art Report A Business Case For Software Process Improvement McGibbon, T.
  25. Software Metrics : A Practitioners Guide to Improved Product Development Moller, K.H.;Paulish, D.J.
  26. Psychometric Theory(2nd ed.) Nunnally, J.C.
  27. IEEE Software v.10 no.7 Capability Maturity Model Version 1.1 Paulk, M.C.;Curtis, B.;Chrissis, M.B.;Weber, C.V.
  28. MIS Quarterly v.24 no.3 Quality Management in Systems Development : An Organizational System Perspective Ravichandran, T.;Rai, A.
  29. MIS Quarterly v.22 no.2 The Effects of Customizaibility on Perceived Process and Competitive Performance of Software Firms Sarma, R.N.;Gary, W.K.
  30. Journal of Managemnt Informational Systems v.16 no.4 Executives' Perceptions fo the Business Value of Information Technology : A Process-Oriented Approach Tallon, P.P.;Kreamer. K.L.;Gurbaxani, V.