The Plant Pathology Journal

The Korean Society of Plant Pathology (한국식물병리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Resistance Level to Cotton leaf curl virus(CLCuV) Among Newly Developed Cotton Mutants and Commercial Cultivars

  • Akhtar, Khalid P. (Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology) ;
  • Khan, Azeem I. (Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology) ;
  • Hussain, M. (Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology) ;
  • Khan, M.S.I. (Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology)
  • Published : 2002.08.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Four newly developed cotton mutants (M-111, M-7662, M-358 and M-218) were compared for their resistance against Cotton leaf curl virus(CLCuV) together with commercial resistant (CIM-443, CIM-482, CIM-473, FH-900 and FH-901) and susceptible (5-12) varieties by artificial inoculation through grafting and under natural field conditions. Infectivity and success of grafting were 100% in all cases. None of the grafted plants were found immune or asymptomatic. All the grafted mutants and most of their single plant progeny rows (SPPRs) showed highly resistant responses as the symptoms displayed by these mutants were milder than the commercial cultivars. Grafted mutants also had delayed disease reactions as they took more time (25-30 days) to produce disease symptoms, as compared with resistant commercial varieties that produced disease 18-22 days after inoculation. Growth of the grafted SPPRs of tested mutants was normal, which is an indication that there will be no production losses. Observations under natural infestation of whitefly showed that two SPPRs of M-ll/CE and M-7662-1/2 and one resistant variety CIM-443 exhibited slight incidence of disease, while one SPPR of M-l1/59 and S-12 were moderately susceptible and highly susceptible with 21％ and 97.l％ disease incidence, respectively. This study also showed that plants displaying more disease symptoms through grafting were easily infected under natural conditions. These results suggest that preference should be given to those plants that exhibited highly resistant responses after artificial inoculation.

Keywords

References

  1. Akhtar, K. R, Khan, A. I. and Khan, M. S. I. 2001. Response of some cotton cultivars to Cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) through grafting. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 13:91-95
  2. Ali, M. 1997. Breeding of cotton varieties for resistance to Cotton leaf curl virus. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 9:1-7
  3. Anonymous, 1997. Economic survey. Govemment of Pakistan Finance Division Islamabad, Pakistan, 1996-1997
  4. Hameed, S. S., Khalid, S., Ehsan-ul- Haq and Hashmi, A. A. 1994. Cotton leaf curl disease in Pakistan caused by whitefly transmitted geminivirus. Plant Dis. 78:528
  5. Hussain, T., Tahir, M. and Mahmood, T. 1991. Cotton leaf curl disease: a review. Pak. J. Phytopathol. 3:57-61
  6. Mahmood, T. 1999. Cotton leaf curl virus and its status in Paki-stan. Proceedings. ICAC-CCRI. Regional consultation insecti-cide resistance management in cotton. Multan, Pakistan. June 28 to July 1. 234-244
  7. Mahmood, T. 1999a. Cotton leaf curl virus disease and its present status in Punjab. The Pak. Cottongrower. 3:17-18
  8. Riaz, A. 1997. Combating Cotton leaf curl virus in Pakistan. The Pak. Cottongrower. 1:12-13
  9. Shah, H., Khalid, S. and Hameed, S. 1999. Response of cotton germplasm to Cotton leaf curl virus, Proceedings. ICAC-CCRI. Regional consultation on insecticide resistance management in cotton. Multan, Pakistan. June 28 to July 1. 250-256
  10. Watkins, G. M. 1981. Compendium of Cotton Diseases. pp. 87, The American Phytopathological Society. Pilot Knob Road, Minnesota, U. S. A.
  11. Zhou, X., Liu, Y., Robinson, D. J. and Harrison, B. D. 1998. Four DNA-A variants among Pakistani Isolates of Cotton leaf curl virus and their affinities to DNA-A of Geminivirus isolates from okra. J. Gen. Virol. 79:915-923 https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-79-4-915

Cited by

  1. Engineered Disease Resistance in Cotton Using RNA-Interference to Knock down Cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus-Burewala and Cotton leaf curl Multan betasatellite Expression vol.9, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/v9090257
  2. Evaluation of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus Resistance in BC1, BC2, and BC3 Progenies from an Interspecific Cross between Gossypium arboreum and Gossypium hirsutum vol.9, pp.11, 2014, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111861
  3. Identification and application of biocontrol agents against Cotton leaf curl virus disease inGossypium hirsutumunder greenhouse conditions vol.30, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/13102818.2016.1148634
  4. Influence of plant age, whitefly population and cultivar resistance on infection of cotton plants by cotton leaf curl virus (CLCuV) in Pakistan vol.86, pp.1, 2004, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00166-7