대한전기학회논문지:시스템및제어부문D (The Transactions of the Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers D)

대한전기학회 (The Korean Institute of Electrical Engineers)
권호 표지

교란들의 인과관계구현 데이터구조에 기초한 발전소의 고장감시 및 고장진단에 관한 연구

Power Plant Fault Monitoring and Diagnosis based on Disturbance Interrelation Analysis Graph

  • Lee, Seung-Cheol (Dept.of Electric Engineering, Engineering College, Chungang University) ;
  • Lee, Sun-Gyo (Dept.of Electric Engineering, Engineering College, Chungang University)
  • 발행 : 2002.09.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In a power plant, disturbance detection and diagnosis are massive and complex problems. Once a disturbance occurs, it can be either persistent, self cleared, cleared by the automatic controllers or propagated into another disturbance until it subsides in a new equilibrium or a stable state. In addition to the Physical complexity of the power plant structure itself, these dynamic behaviors of the disturbances further complicate the fault monitoring and diagnosis tasks. A data structure called a disturbance interrelation analysis graph(DIAG) is proposed in this paper, trying to capture, organize and better utilize the vast and interrelated knowledge required for power plant disturbance detection and diagnosis. The DIAG is a multi-layer directed AND/OR graph composed of 4 layers. Each layer includes vertices that represent components, disturbances, conditions and sensors respectively With the implementation of the DIAG, disturbances and their relationships can be conveniently represented and traced with modularized operations. All the cascaded disturbances following an initial triggering disturbance can be diagnosed in the context of that initial disturbance instead of diagnosing each of them as an individual disturbance. DIAG is applied to a typical cooling water system of a thermal power plant and its effectiveness is also demonstrated.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Davis, R. 'Diagnostic Reasoning Based on Structure and Behavior.' Artificial Intelligence, 24(1-3): 347-410 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(84)90042-0
  2. Adams, T.L. 'Model-Based Reasoning for Automated Fault Diagnosis and Recovery Planning in Space Power System.' IECEC Conf. Proc., pp.1763-1769, 1986
  3. de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. C. 1987. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 32:97-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90063-4
  4. Obreja, I. 1990. Diagnosis of Power Plant Faults Using Qualitative Models and Heuristic Rules. Proc. Third International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems, July Chareston https://doi.org/10.1145/98784.98794
  5. Rafea, a., El-Dewouki, A., and ElMoniern, S. 'Combined Model Expert System for Electronics Fault Diagnosis.' Proc. Third International Conference on Industrial & Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence & Expert Systems, July, charleston, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1145/98784.98793
  6. Moore, R.L., Hawkinson, L.B., Kinckerbocker, C.G., and Cherchman, L.M. 'A Real-Time Expert System for Process Control.' 1st Conf. on AI Applications, pp. 569-576, December, Denber, 1984
  7. Marios M. Polycarpou, 'Automated Fault Detection and Accommodation', IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics, VOL. 25, no. 11, November, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.467710
  8. Reiter, R 1987. A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artificial Intelligence 32:57-95 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90062-2
  9. Davis, R., and Hamscher, W. 1988. Model-based Reasoning: Troubleshooting. In Exploring AI, eds. H. E. Schrobe and AAAI, pp. 297-346, Palo Alto, Carif.: Morgan Kaufmann
  10. de Kleer, J., and Williams, B. C. 1987. Diagnosing multiple faults. Artificial Intelligence 32:97-130 https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(87)90063-4
  11. Poole, D. 1989. Normality and Faults in Logic-Based Diagnosis. Proc Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1304-1310, August 20-25, Detroit
  12. Gallanti, M., Roncato, M., Stefanini, A., and Tornielli, G. 1989. A Diagnostic Algorithm Based on Models at Different Level of Abstraction. Proceedings Eleventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1350-1355, August 20-25, Detroit
  13. Struss, P., Dressler, 0., 1989. Physical Negation-Integrating Fault Models into the General Diagnostic Engine. Proc. of the 11th IJCAI, pp 1318-1323, August 20-25, Detroit. nter
  14. Laffey. T. J, Cox, P. A. Schmidt, J. L., Kao, S. M., Read, J. Y. 1988. Real-Time Knowledge Based Systems. AI Mag., Spring:27-45
  15. 보령화력 3,4호기 운전 지침서
  16. 이승철, 어래진, '계층값들의 인과관계를 이용한 체계적인 계측값 검증기법에 관한 연구', 전기학회논문지, 제47권 10호, pp1768-1773. 1998
  17. 'Sensor Value Validation based on Systematic Exploration of the Sensor Redundancy', IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. 24, No.4, pp. 594-605, April, 1994 https://doi.org/10.1109/21.286380