Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology

The Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers (대한기계학회)
권호 표지

Game Optimal Receding Horizon Guidance Laws and Its Equivalence to Receding Horizon Guidance Laws

  • Park, Jae-Weon (School of Mechanical Engineering and RIMT, Pusan National University) ;
  • Kim, Ki-Baek (California Institute of Technology Electrical Eng., & Computer Sci.)
  • Published : 2002.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this paper, a game optimal receding horizon guidance law (GRHG) is proposed, which does not use information of the time-to-go and target maneuvers. It is shown that by adjusting design parameters appropriately, the proposed GRHG is identical to the existing receding horizon guidance law (RHG), which can intercept the target by keeping the relative vertical separation less than the given value, within which the warhead of the missile is detonated, after the appropriately selected time in the presence of arbitrary target maneuvers and initial relative vertical separation rates between the target and missile. Through a simulation study, the performance of the GRHG is illustrated and compared with that of the existing optimal guidance law (OGL).

Keywords

References

  1. Basar, T., 1991, 'A Dynamic Games Approach to Controller Design : Disturbance rejection in discrete-time,' IEEE Transaction, on Automatic Control, Vol. 36, pp. 936-952 https://doi.org/10.1109/9.133187
  2. Choi, J. W. and Yoon, J., 1999, 'An Attitude Stability Accommodating Guidance Technique for a Launch Vehicle,' KSME International Journal, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 700-708 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02939318
  3. Gerald M. A., 1981, 'Comparison of Optimal Control and Differential Game Intercept Missile Guidance Laws,' Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 109-115 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56061
  4. Ha, I. J., Hur, J. S., Ko, M. S. and Song, T. L., 1990, 'Performance Analysis of PNG Laws for Randomly Maneuvering Targets,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 26, No. 5, pp. 713-721 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.102706
  5. Holder, E. J. and Sylveser, V. B., 1990, 'An Analysis of Modern Versus Classical Homing Guidance,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 599-606 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.55553
  6. Hull, D. G., Radke, J. J. and Mack, R. E., 1991, 'Time-to-Go Prediction for Homing Missile Based on Minimum-Time Intercepts,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 14, No. 5, pp. 865-871 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.20725
  7. Kim, K. B., Kim, M. J. and Kwon, W. H., 2000a, 'Receding Horizon Guidance Laws with No Information on the Time-to-Go,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 193-199 https://doi.org/10.2514/2.4518
  8. Kim, K. B., Kim, M. J. and Choi, J. W., 2000b, 'Modified Receding Horizon Guidance Law with Information on Small Accurate Time-to-Go,' IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, Vol, 36, No. 2, pp. 725-729 https://doi.org/10.1109/7.845274
  9. Lee, G. K. F., 1985, 'Estimation of the Time-to-Go Parameter for Air-to-Air Missiles,' Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 262-266 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.19969
  10. Lin, C. F., 1994, Advanced Control System Design, Prentice Hall Series in Adavanced Navigation, Guidance, and Control, and Their Applications, Prentice Hall, New Jersey
  11. Nesline, F. W. and Zarchan, P., 1979, 'A New Look at Classical vs Modern Homing Missile Guidance,' Journal of Guidance and Control, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 78-85 https://doi.org/10.2514/3.56054