Family Resource Management Pattern by Dual Role Manager of the Family Business in Korea and The United States

가족기업 종사 이중역할 수행자의 가족자원관리 행동유형 분석: 한국과 미국간 비교연구

  • 김지희 (세인트루이스 대학교 경영학과 및 벤처창업 경영연구소) ;
  • Published : 2002.04.01

Abstract

While there is universal agreement that the ecosystems approach to family resource management is the must influential currently, questions have arisen about the broad applicability of the Deacon & Firebaugh (1988) ecosystems framework. Engberg (1996) has characterized the dominant approach in family resource management as technical and argued that a technical approach substantially restricts feasible actions in much of the world and should not be used in ethical practice. The purpose of the present paper is to compare the family resource management patterns by dual role manager of business owning families in Korea and The United States. Such a comparison is an essential step in the assessment of the usefulness of the Deacon & Firebaugh framework, in particular, and the ecosystems framework, more generally. Korean respondents are 105 family and business managers interviewed in 2000 as part of a survey of owners of small to medium size family business enterprises in Seoul. U.S. respondents are 259 dual role managers in the National Family Business Survey (NFBS 1997). Chi squared statistics indicated country differences on each of the ten(goal setting, standard setting, demand clarification, resource assessment, action sequencing, actuating, checking, adjusting, demand responses, resource change)management practices. Mean responses on eight of the practices(goal setting, standard setting, action sequencing, actuating, checking, adjusting, demand responses, resource changes) were significantly different between two countries. U.S. total score means of family resource management were higher than Korea. Factor analysis of the management scale items yielded different patterns for Korea, and the United States. Korean dual role manager of family business were categorized into three different patterns as classic oriented manager, goal oriented manager, action oriented manager and U.S. were categorized into Process oriented manager and Production oriented manager. Both the number of managerial strategies and the types of strategies used varied in the two countries.

Keywords

References

  1. 이화여자대학교 대학원 박사학위논문 가족기업(Family Business) 가정에 관한 연구;이론 및 실태를 중심으로 김지희
  2. 한국가정관리학회지 v.17 no.1 가족기업(Family Business)의 양가속성 및 이중기능체계에 관한 연구 김지희
  3. Family Business-가족기업 창업 및 경영론 김지희
  4. 한국가족자원경영학회지 v.5 no.1 가족기업 실증연구 영역 및 교과모형 개발에 관한 연구 김지희;문숙재
  5. 대한가정학회지 v.38 no.7 가족기업의 가족체계;소규모 가족기업에 있어서 가족구성원의 참여유형 김혜연;김성희
  6. 한국가족자원경영학회지 v.2 no.1 SOHO(Small Office Home Office)직이 가사노동참여시간에 미치는 영향 문숙재;김은희;이석경;채민정
  7. 한국가족자원경영학회지(창간호) 가족자원활용을 위한 재택사업(Home Based Office)에 관한 연구 문숙재;김지희
  8. 대한가정학회지 v.36 no.5 가족기업(Family Business)경영에 관한 이론적 논의 문숙재;김지희
  9. 한국가정관리학회지 v.12 no.1 가정관리유형과 관련변인에 관한 연구 오경희;이정우
  10. 한국가정관리학회지 v.15 no.1 도시 전업주부의 가치지향성, 가정관리전략, 가정관리만족도 이정우
  11. 이화여자대학교 대학원 석사학위청구논문(미간행) 소규모 가족기업의 승계에 관한 연구;소규모 자영업체와 제조업체를 중심으로 정유희
  12. 한국가정관리학회지 v.17 no.2 효과적 가정관리조건에 관한 연구;자원유용성과 의사소통과의 관계를 중심으로 한경미
  13. Canadian Review of Sociology & Anthropology v.37 Self-employment as a response to the double day for women and men in Canada Arai, A. B.
  14. Family Business sourcebook Aronoff, C. E.;Ward, J. L.
  15. Home Economics Research Journal v.6 no.March Morphostatic and morphogenic planning behavior in families;Development of a measurement instrument Beard, D.;Firebaugh, F. M. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077727X7800600302
  16. Economic Journal v.75 A theory of the allocation of time Becker, G.
  17. Journal of Consumer Studies and Home Economics v.12 Correlates of marital satisfaction in a Manitoba low income sample Clearwater, E.;Harvey, C. D. H. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1470-6431.1988.tb00476.x
  18. Family Business sourcebook Bivalent attributes of the family firm Davis, J. A.;Tagiuri, R.;Aronoff, C. E(ed);Ward, J. L.(ed)
  19. Family Resource Management: Principles and Applications Deacon, R. E.;Firebaugh, F. M.
  20. Harvard Business Review v.42 no.4 The Family Business Donnelley, R. G.
  21. Canadian Home Economics Journal v.49 Balancing employment and household work activities;The role of workplace location Duncan, K. A.
  22. Journal of Family and Economic Issues v.21 no.3 The importance of household management for the business-owning family Duncan, K. A.;Zuiker, V. S.;Heck, R. K. Z. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009437518553
  23. Family Resource Management Issues Critical thinking about family resource management Engberg, L. E.;Varjonen, J.(ed);Steinmuller, H.(ed)
  24. Journal of Family and Economic Issues v.13 no.2 Managing work and family in home-based employment Heck, R. K. Z.;Winter, M.;Stafford, K. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01022418
  25. Family Business Review v.12 no.3 The prevalence of family business from a household sample Heck, R. K. Z.;Trent, E. S. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1999.00209.x
  26. Gender and Home-based Employment Home-based employment: Relating gender and household structure to management and child care Hunts, H.;Danes, S.;Haynes, D.;Heck, R. K. Z.;Hennon, C. B.(ed);Loker, S.(ed);Walker, R.(ed)
  27. Family business management: Concepts and practice Ibrahim. A. B.;Ellis, W. H.
  28. Journal of Family Issues v.19 Performance of household tasks by Vietnamese and Lao refugees;Tradition and change Johnson, P. J. https://doi.org/10.1177/019251398019003002
  29. Journal of Marriage and the Family v.58 A market method to test a phasing hypothesis in family problem-solving interaction Kieren, D. K.;Maguire, T. O. https://doi.org/10.2307/353508
  30. Cross Cultual Approaches to Home Management Scheduling congruity theory of family resource management: A basis for cross cultural analyses Stafford, K.;Avery, R. J.;Schweitzer, Rosemarie(ed)
  31. Time use: A measure of household production of family goods and services Walker, K. E.;Woods, M. E.
  32. Family Relations v.44 The impact of workplace support on work-family role strain Warren, J. A.;Johnson, P. J. https://doi.org/10.2307/584803
  33. Family Business Review v.11 Revisiting the study of family business: Methodological challenges, dilemmas, and alternative approaches Winter, M.;Fitzgerald, M. A.;Heck, R. K. Z.;Haynes, G. W.;Danes, S. M. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-6248.1998.00239.x
  34. Family Economics and Resource Management Biennial v.1 Home-based work: Gender differences in management across domains Zuiker, V. S.;Stafford, K.;Heck, R. K. Z.;Winter, M.
  35. In the Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Eastern Family Economics and Resource Management Association Home-based work;Gender differences in management of family work Zuiker, V. S.;Stafford, K.;Heck, R. Z.;Winter, M.