DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Patient and Facility Characteristics On the Resource Use by the Elderly in Long-term Care Services

환자 및 시설 특성이 장기요양서비스 이용 노인의 자원소모량에 미치는 영향

  • 권순만 (서울대학교 보건대학원 보건정책관리학과) ;
  • 김홍수 (서울대학교 보건대학원 보건정책관리학과) ;
  • 김선민 (국가인권위원회 사무처준비단)
  • Published : 2002.03.01

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to measure the resource use of the elderly in long-term care services and to examine the effects of patient and facility characteristics on their use of resources. The data were collected from 510 old people over sixty years of age, residing in five long-term care hospitals and two skilled nursing homes during the period between December 1, 2000 and February 28, 2001. For a full sample, when the first level of RUG(Resource Use Group)-III categories were employed as the proxy of patient severity, facility characteristics, such as location, size and ownership, have large effects on the resource use measured by service intensity, whereas patient characteristics such as severity have little or no effect. The resource use is significantly high if the facility: (1) is located in rural areas (gun): (2) has mare than 200 beds; (3) is a long-term care hospital; (4) is private; and (5) has a low percentage of medical aid patients. The analysis of the resource use in each RUG-III categories, for which ADL(Ability of Daily Living) were employed as the prosy of patient severity, shows a similar result. The loose relationship between the needs of residents and the resource use seems to be closely associated with the ineffective reimbursement system for providers. The current reimbursement system has no provision for quality improvement and reimburses facilities simply according to their types: fee-for-service for long-term care hospitals, and monthly-flat-rate or full-coverage-national-aid for skilled nursing facilities. It will be necessary to develop a more reasonable reimbursement system that takes patient's severity into account and gives incentives for long-term care providers to offer cost-effective services.

Keywords

References

  1. 강임옥. 노인인구의 간호요양원 필요예측에 관한 연구. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1998
  2. 김현진. 한국판 RAI-MDS 2.0의 타당도에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 보건대학원 석사학위논문, 2000
  3. 대한병원협회. 전원병원명부. 2000
  4. 변재관, 정경희, 조애저, 오영희, 이윤경, 이윤환. 장기입소노인시설 보건의료서비스 제공현황 및 개선방안 연구. 한국보건사회연구원, 1999
  5. 오영호, 한지숙, 오진주. 요양병원의 수요현황과 정책과제. 한국보건사회연구원, 1999
  6. 이지전. RUG-III를 이용한 노인환자군 분류와 타당성 검증. 연세대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1999
  7. 장현숙. 노인 입원환자의 병원서비스 구성 분석: 급성 및 비급성 진료 중심으로. 가톨릭대학교 대학원 박사학위논문, 1999
  8. 장현숙, 김은경, 오종희, 장혜정. 요양병원 운영체계 개발 연구. 한국보건의료관리연구원, 1997
  9. 한국보건산업진흥원. '98.'99 전국병원경영분석. 2000
  10. 허정순. 노인장기요양보호 재원조달방안으로서 MSA 응용모형 도입에 관한 연구. 서울대학교 보건대학원 석사학위논문, 2001
  11. Arling G, Nordquist RH, Capitman JA. Nursing home cost and ownership type:Evidence of interaction effects. Health Services Research 1987;22(2): 255-269
  12. Bienbaum H, Bishop C, Lee AJ, Jenson G. Why do nursing home costs vary? The determinants of home costs. Medical Care 1981; 91(11): 1095-1107
  13. Bjorkgren MA, Hakkinen U, Finne-Soveri H, Fries BE. Validity and reliability of resource utilization groups(RUG Ill) in finnish long-term care facilities. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 1999; 27: 228-234
  14. Carpenter GI, Turner GF, Fowler RW. Casernix for inpatient care of elderly people: Rehabilitation and post-acute care. Age and Ageing 1997; 26: 123-131 https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/26.2.123
  15. Caswell RJ, Cleverley WO. Cost analysis of the Ohio nursing home industry. Health Service Research 1983; 18(3): 359-382
  16. Chiu L, Shyu WC, Chen TR. A cost-effectiveness analysis of home care and community-based nursing homes for stroke patients and their families. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 26(5): 872-878 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.00410.x
  17. Elwell F. The effects of ownership on institutional services. The Gerontologist 1984; 24(1): 77-83 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/24.1.77
  18. Fries BE, Ljunggren G, Winblad U. International validation and reliability testing of a patient classification system for long-term care. European Journal of Gerontology 1992; 6: 372-383
  19. Fries BE, Schneider DP, Foley W, Gavazzi M, Burke R, Cornelius E. Refining a case-nux measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups(RUG-IID. Medical Care 1994; 32(7): 668-685 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199407000-00002
  20. Gruber-Baldini A, Zimmerman S, Mortimore E, Magaziner J. The validity of the minimum data set in measuring the cognitive impairment of persons admitted to nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2000; 48: 1601-1600 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03870.x
  21. Hicks LL, Rantz MJ, Petroski GF, Madsen RW, Conn VS, Mehr DR, Porter R, Assessing contributors to cost of care in nursing homes. Nursing Economics 1997; 15(4): 205-212
  22. Ikegami K, Fries BE, Takagi Y, Ikeda S, The T. Applying RUG-III in Japanese long-term care facilities. The Gerontologist 1994; 34(3): 628-639
  23. Mckay Nl, The effect of chain ownership on nursing home costs. Health Services Research 1991; 26(1): 109-124
  24. Meiners MR. An econometric analysis of the major determinants of nursing home costs in the United States. Social Science of Medicine 1982; 16(8): 887-898 https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(82)90208-8
  25. Nyman JA. The effect of competition on nursing home expenditures under prospective reimbursement. Health Services Research 1988; 23(4): 555-574
  26. O'Brien J, Saxberg B, Smith H. For-profit or not for-profit homes; Does it matter? The Gerontologist 1983; 23: 803-808
  27. O'Neill C, Groom L, Avery AJ, Boot D, Thornhill K. Age and proximity to death as predictors of GP care costs: Results from a study of nursing home patients. Health Economics 2000; 9(8): 733-738 https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1050(200012)9:8<733::AID-HEC564>3.0.CO;2-U
  28. Schlenker R, Shaughnessy P, Yslas I. The effect of case mix and quality on cost differences between hospital-based and freestanding nursing homes. Inquiry 1983; 20: 361-368
  29. Schneider DP, Fries BE, Foley WJ, Desmond M, Gormley WJ. Case mix for nursing home payment: Resource utilization groups, Version II. Health Care Financing Review 1988; Dec(Spec): 39-52
  30. Shaughnessy PW, Kramer AM, Schlenker RE, Polesovsky MB. Nursing home case-mix differences between Medicare and non-Medicare and between hospital-based and freestanding patients. Inquiry 1985; 22: 162-177
  31. Thorpe KE, Gertler PJ, Goldman P. The resource utilization group system: Its effect on nursing home case mix and costs. Inquiry 1991; 28: 357-365
  32. Ullmann SG. Assessment of facility quality and its relationship of facility Size In the long-term health care industry. The Gerontologist 1981; 21(1): 91-97
  33. Ullmann SG. The impact of quality on cost in the provision of long-term care. Inquiry 1985; 22(3): 293-302
  34. Wiener J, Liu K, Schieber G. Case-mix differences between hospital-based and freestanding skilled nursing facilities: A review of the evidence. Medical Care 1986; 24(12): 1173-1182 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-198612000-00009
  35. Zbylot S, Job C, Evelyn M, Boulter C. A case-mix classification system for long-term care facilities. Nursing Management 1995; 26(4): 49-54 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006247-199504000-00013
  36. Zinn JS, Mor V. Nursing home special care units: Distribution by type, state, and facility characteristics. The Gerontologist 1994; 34(3): 371-377 https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/34.3.371
  37. http://www.hcfa.gov, 2001
  38. http://www.interrai.org, 2001
  39. http://www.mohw.go.kr. 2001

Cited by

  1. Patient and Hospital Characteristics of Long-Stay Admissions in Long-Term Care Hospitals in Korea vol.26, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4332/KJHPA.2016.26.1.39