The Korean Journal of Ecology

The Ecological Society of Korea (한국생태학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Territory Defense Strategy of the Wrinkled Frog, Rana rugosa

  • Park, Shi-Ryong (Dept. of Biology, Korea National University of Education) ;
  • Cheong, Seokwan (Dept. of Biology, Korea National University of Education)
  • Published : 2002.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The advertisement call of anurans functions to attract potential mates. The dominant frequency of an advertisement call is generally getting lower with increased snout-vent length (SVL) of the caller Rana rugosa has an advertisement call tilth a particularly high frequency modulation. We conducted a playback experiment to verify the function of frequency modulation, and investigated the territorial behavior of the frog. The frog has five types of territory defense strategy. Strategy choice depended on the caller's SVL. Small males became satellites or lowered the dominant frequency of their advertisement call, whereas large males actively defended their territory with encounter calls. In response to high frequency (1107 Hz) playback, the frogs lowered their advertisement call frequency, and towered them further in response to the low frequency (1028 Hz) playback. In addition, the number of pulses in a call was increased in response to the playback. These results indicate that the frog avoids physical conflict with competitors by selecting a territory defense strategy suitable for the caller's size, and by lowering its call frequency to disguise its SVL.

Keywords

References

  1. Davis, N. B. and T. R. Halliday. 1977. Optimal mate selection in the toad Bufo bufo. Nature 269: 56-58 https://doi.org/10.1038/269056a0
  2. Davies, N. B. and T. R. Halliday. 1978. Deep croaks and fighting assessment in toads Bufo bufo. Nature 274: 683-685 https://doi.org/10.1038/274683a0
  3. Fellers, G. M. 1975. Behavioral interactions in North American treefrogs (Hylidae). Chesapeake Sci. 16: 218-219 https://doi.org/10.2307/1350900
  4. Howard, R. D. 1978. The influence of male-defended oviposition sites on early embryo mortality in bullfrogs. Ecology 59: 789-798 https://doi.org/10.2307/1938783
  5. Mauger, D. 1989. Analysis of calling behavior of the bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) in several northeastern Illinois populations. Bull. Chi. Herp. Soc. 24: 208-215
  6. Morris, M. R. 1989. Female choice of large males in the treefrog Hyls chrysoscelis: the importance of identifying the scale of choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25:275-281 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300054
  7. No, D. C. and S. R. Park. 1992. The study on the acoustic behaviour of Rana rugosa. Korean J. Behav. Biol. 1(2): 121-129
  8. Pierce, J.R. and D. B. Ralin. 1972. Vocalizations and behavior of the males of three species in the Hyla versicolor complex. Herpetologica 28: 329-337
  9. Robertson, J. G. M. 1986. Male terrltoriality, fighting and assessmerit of fighting ability in the Australian frog Uperoleia rugosa. Anim. Behav. 34: 763-772 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(86)80060-4
  10. Smith, R. L. 1996. Ecology and field biology. 5th ed. Harper Collins Publishers Inc. New York
  11. Sullivan, B. K. 1985. Male calling behavior in response to playbacks of conspecific advertisement calls in two bufonids. J. Herpetol. 19: 78-83 https://doi.org/10.2307/1564422
  12. Wagner, W. E. 1989a. Social correlates of variation in male calling behavior in Blanchard' s cricket frog, Achs crepitans blanchardi. Ethology 82: 27-45 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.1989.tb00485.x
  13. Wagner, W. E. 1989b. Graded aggressive signals in Blanchard's cricket frog: vocal responses to opponent proximity and size. Anim. Behav. 38:1025-1038 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-3472(89)80141-1
  14. Wagner, W.E. 1989c. Fighting, assessment, and frequency alteration in Blanchard' s cricket frog. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 25: 429-436 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00300189
  15. Wagner, W. E. 1992. Deceptive or honest signalling of fighting ability? A test of alternative hypotheses for the function of changes in call dominant frequency by male cricket forgs Anim. Behav. 44:449-462 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(92)90055-E
  16. Wells, K. D. 1977. The social behavior of anuran amphibians. Anim. Behav. 25: 666-693 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(77)90118-X
  17. Wells, K. D. 1978. Territoriality in the green frog (Rana clamifans): Vocalizations and agonistic behavior. Anim. Behav. 26:1051-1063 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-3472(78)90094-5
  18. Wells, K. D. 1989. Vocal communication in a neotropical treefrog, Hyla ebraccata: Response of males to graded aggressive calls. Copeia. 1989:461-466 https://doi.org/10.2307/1445444
  19. Whitney, C. L. and Krebs, J.R. 1975. Spacing and calling in Pacific treefrogs, Hyla regilla. Can. J. Zool. 53:1519-1527 https://doi.org/10.1139/z75-187