DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Rehabilitation Ecology by Revegetation: Approach and Results from Two Mediterranean Countries

  • Published : 2002.04.01

Abstract

Human activities greatly affect the environment causing its degradation. Urban development and road networks construction cause main impacts on ecosystems and particularly on vegetation cover: road constructions induce complete degradation of the vegetation cover and often leaves a hare land, sometimes without even a soil cover. Reconstitution of vegetation cover is necessary to limit superficial erosion and land slipping on the road, towards a reintegration of the site in the neighbouring landscape. Many approaches have been studied over the last 30 years aiming at this reconstitution of vegetation cover. At frost, the main purpose of land reclamation was to create a new ecosystem. At this time, the environment created was rather a "garden" with a new soil adapted to the plantation of "decorative" species. Then, in early 90′s many studies on the restoration ecology concept rather focused on adapting the vegetation to the existing conditions on the site, as in a side road embankment for example. Nowadays, we notice a large tendency towards the use of such adapted native species instead of industrially produced seeds. In southern France, our team have led research on the potentials of those local species for their use in revegetation processes with hydro-seeding. We therefore developed an approach combining the use of different types of species: Industrially produced, native and wild cultivated species. This method integrates the benefits of using available low costing seeds that are already used on large scale projects with better adapted species, issued form the cultivation of native species and seed production for their use on smaller scale and more costly but more effective results. The use of wild cultivated species seeds was developed in order to limit the cost and reduce harsh natural seed withdrawal in the natural environment In the case of the use of native species. Besides, the use of such seeds allowed a larger geographical scale of use than with local native seeds. In addition, our team began two years ago a research project in Lebanon aiming at the Introduction and development of the revegetation techniques in Lebanon. In fact, this country bared since 20 years the consequences of urban pressure on its environment especially by the development of quarries and road networks. Therefore, pioneer work is necessary to aim at the adaptation of these techniques to the local environment.

Keywords

References

  1. Aber, J. D. and W. R. Jordan III. 1985. Restoration ecology: an environmental middle ground. Bioscience 35 (7): 399 https://doi.org/10.1093/bioscience/35.7.399
  2. AI Samman Winkel N, A. Martin and S. Puech. 2000. Inflorescence architecture variability and its possible consequences on the colonisation ability in a Mediterranean species: Euphorbia nicaeensis AII. (Euphorbiaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 136: 99-105
  3. Aronson J., C. Floret, E. Le Floc h, C. Ovalle and R. Pontanier. 1993a. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosysterns in arid and semi-arid lands. I. A View from the South. Restoration Ecology 1: 8-17 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00004.x
  4. Aronson, J., C. Floret, E. Le Floc h, C. Ovalle and R. Pontanier 1993b. Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosysterns in arid and semi-arid lands. I. Case studies from southern Tunisia, central Chile and northern Cameroon. Restoration Ecology 1: 168-187 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1993.tb00023.x
  5. Bradshaw, A. D. 1983. The reconstruction of ecosytems. Journal of Applied Ecology 20:1-17 https://doi.org/10.2307/2403372
  6. Cairns, J. 1980. The recovery process in damaged ecosytems. Ann Arbor Science publishers inc. 167 p
  7. Clements, F. E. 1916. Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst. Washington. Publ. 242: 1-512
  8. Connell, J. H. and R. O. Slatyer. 1997. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111:1119-1144
  9. Dejeant, M. 1985. Les zones c$\t{o}$tieres en droit international de I' environnement, actions pour la mise en valeur des zones c$\t{o}$tieres mediterran$\'{e}$ennes. Th$\`{e}$se Doct. d' etat, Universite de Montpellierl, 713 p
  10. Drury, W. H. and I.C.T. Nisbet. 1973. Succession. Journal of Arnold Arboretum 54:331-368
  11. Egler, F, E. 1954. Vegetation science concepts. $\1^circ$ initial floristlc composition, a factor in old field vegetation development. Vegetatio 4:412-417 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00275587
  12. Forbes, B. C. and R. L. Jefferies. 1999. Revegetation of disturbed artic sites: constraints and applications. Biological Conservation 88: 15-24 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(98)00095-0
  13. Jordan, W. R. III, M. E. Gilpin and J. D. Aber. 1987. Restoration ecology: ecological restoration as a technique for basic research, In Jordan III W.R., Gilpin M.E. and Aber J. D. eds Restoration ecology, a synthetic approach to ecological research, Cambridge University Press. 3-21
  14. Keeley, S. C., J. E. Keeley, S. M. Hutchinson and A. W. Johnson 1981. Postfire succession of the herbaceous flora in southern California chaparral, Ecology 62:1608-1621 https://doi.org/10.2307/1941516
  15. Le Floc'h, E. and J. Aronson. 1995. Ecologie de la restauration. Definition de quelques concepts de base. Natures - Sciences - Soci$\$\'{e}$s, Hors Serie, 29-35.
  16. Lippitt, L, M. W. Fidelibus and D. A. Brainbridge. 1994. Native Seed Collection, Processing, and Storage for Revegetation Projects in the Western United States. Restoration Ecology 2 (2): 120-131 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-100X.1994.tb00049.x
  17. Martin, A., V. Grzeskowiack and S. Puech. 1996. Comparative study on germination patterns variability of three sympatric plant species. Acta Oecologica 16 (4): 479-490
  18. Martin, A. and S. Puech. 2000. Inter annual and inter population variation in Helichrysum stoechas (Asteraceae), a species of disturbed habitats in the Mediterranean region, Plant Species Biology 16: 29-37 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-1984.2001.00052.x
  19. Martin, A., J. El Oualidi and S. Puech. 2000. Analyse de la variation inter-populationnelle de la croissance chez deux esp$\`{e}$ces v$\`{e}$g$\`{e}$tales de milieux perturb$\`{e}$s: int$\`{e}$r$\~{e}$t pour la rev$\`{e}$g$\`{e}$talisation en r$\`{e}$gion m$\`{e}$diterran$\`{e}$enne. La Terre et la Vie 56:21-35
  20. Martin, A., J. F. Duque, J. Pedraza, A. Diez, M. A. Sanz and R. M. Carrasco. 1998. A geomorphological design for the rehabilitation of an abandoned sand quarry in central Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning 42:1-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(98)00070-X
  21. Mineau, H. 1987. D$\'{e}$mographie et dynamique de recolonisation des talus routiers nouvellement cr$\'{e}$$\'{e}$s, chez quelques esp$\'{e}$ces herbac$\'{e}$es hemicryptophytes de la r$\'{e}$gion m$\'{e}$diterran$\'{e}$enne. Th$\'{e}$se Doct. Universit$\'{e}$ Montpelier2, 327p
  22. Mineau, H., 1990. Roole des conditions climatiques dans les caract$\'{e}$ristiques germinatives de diaspores de Scabiosa atropurpurea. Implication dans la reconstitution de la banque de diaspores. Acta Oecologica, Ecologia Plantarum 11 (2): 235-243
  23. Naveh, Z. 1988. Multifactorial reconstruction of semi arid Mediterranean landscapes for multipurpose land uses. The reconstruction of disturbed arid lands. Ed. Edith Aleen. colorado
  24. Pickart, A. J. 1988. Dune revegetation at Buhne Point, King Salomon, California, In J. J. Berger(ed.), Environmental restoration, science and strategies for restoring the earth Island press, Washington DC. pp. 38-49
  25. Puech, S., C. Ribannier and A. Martin. 1997. Aerial seed bank and intrapopulation variability in germinative strategies of Verbascum phlomoides L. Plant Species Blology 12:43-48 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-1984.1997.tb00155.x
  26. Putwain, P. D. and D. A. Gillham. 1990. The significance of the dormant viable seed bank in the restoration of Heathlands. Biological Conservation 52:1-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(90)90010-M
  27. Tordoff, G. M., A. J. M. Baker and A. J. Willis. 2000. Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 41:219-228 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(99)00414-2
  28. Truman, P. Y. 2000. Restoration ecology and conservation biology. Biological Conservation 92: 73-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-3207(99)00057-9
  29. Whittaker, R. H. 1975. Communities and ecosystems, 2nd ed., MacMillan. 385 p
  30. Wilson, S. D. 1987. The suppression of native prairie by alien species introduced for revegetation. Landscape and Urban Planning 17:113-119 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-2046(89)90019-4
  31. Zavala, M. A and T. V. Burkey. 1997. Application of ecological models to landscape planning: the case of the Mediterranean basin. Landscape and Urban Planning 38:213-227 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(97)00035-2

Cited by

  1. Spontaneous vegetation dynamics and restoration prospects for limestone quarries in Lebanon vol.6, pp.2, 2009, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1654-109X.2003.tb00580.x
  2. Abandoned Quarries in the Akreuch Area (Western Morocco): Inventory of Flora for a Rehabilitation Strategy vol.05, pp.08, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4236/oje.2015.58030
  3. Invasive potential and management of naturalised ornamentals across an urban environmental gradient with a focus on Centranthus ruber vol.48, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v48i1.2345
  4. Spontaneous vegetation dynamics and restoration prospects for limestone quarries in Lebanon vol.6, pp.2, 2003, https://doi.org/10.1658/1402-2001(2003)006[0199:SVDARP]2.0.CO;2