Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제15권4호
  • /
  • Pages.522-527
  • /
  • 2002
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Feeding Urea and Soybean Meal-Treated Rice Straw on Digestibility of Feed Nutrients and Growth Performance of Bull Calves

  • Ahmed, S. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Khan, M.J. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Shahjalal, M. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University) ;
  • Islam, K.M.S. (Department of Animal Nutrition, Bangladesh Agricultural University)
  • 투고 : 2001.08.21
  • 심사 : 2001.11.27
  • 발행 : 2002.04.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The experiment was conducted for a period of 56 days with twelve Bangladeshi bull calves of average body weight of $127.20{\pm}11.34$ kg. The calves were divided into 3 groups having 4 animals in each. The animals were fed urea-treated rice straw designated as A) 4% urea-treated rice straw, B) 4% urea+4% soybean-treated rice straw and C) 4% urea+6% soybean-treated rice straw. In addition, all the animals were supplied 2 kg green grass, 350 g Til-oil-cake and 100 g common salt per 100 kg body weight of animals. Straw was treated with 4% urea solution and soybean meal at 4 and 6% were added to treated straw and kept for 48 h in double layer polythene bags under anaerobic condition. Urea treatment improved crude protein (CP) content of rice straw from 2.68 to 8.70% and it was further increased by 10.74 and 12.12% with the addition of 4 and 6% soybean meal. Dry matter (DM) intake (kg) was higher (p<0.05) in C (4.2) followed by B (4.1) and A (4.0). Crude protein intake was significantly higher (p<0.05) in group B and C than group A. Total live weight gains were 20.2, 24.8 and 25.6 kg for calves of group A, B and C respectively (p<0.01). The addition of soybean meal to treated rice straw did not affect the coefficients of digestibility of DM, OM, EE and NFE. However, CP and CF digestibility were significantly higher in group B and C (p<0.05). The values for digestible crude protein (DCP), digestible ether extract (DEE), digestible nitrogen free extract (DNFE) and total digestible nutrients (TDN) were significantly (p<0.05) higher in diet C and B in comparison to diet A, but there were no significant difference in digestible organic matter (DOM) and digestible crude fibre (DCF) value among the groups. It may be concluded that 4% urea treated rice straw can be fed to growing bull calves with 2 kg green grass and a small quantity of concentrate without any adverse effect on feed intake and growth. Moreover, soybean meal at 4 and 6% can be added to urea treated rice straw at the time of treatment for rapid hydrolyzing of urea, which resulted an improvement in nutrient digestibility and better utilization of rice straw for growth of growing bull calves.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aminullah, M. 1996. Improving the Nutritive Value of Cereal Straw by Treatment With Urea and Urease Containing Plant Extract. M. Sc. Thesis. Dept. of Animal Nutrition. Bangladesh
  2. Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. AOAC. 1990. Official Methods of Analysis. 15th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Virginia.
  3. ARC. 1990. The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. 4th edn. CAB International, Wallingford, pp. 73-310.
  4. Dias, A. A., M. A. Ferrenia and Cristinr V. N. Gwedes. 1988. Effect of moisture level, treatment time and soybean addition on the nutritive value of urea treated maize stover. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 19:67-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(88)90055-7
  5. Djajanegara, A. and P. T. Doyle. 1989. Urea supplementation compared with pretreatment: I. Effects on intake, digestion and live-weight change by sheep fed a rice straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 27-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(89)90126-0
  6. FAO. 1990. Production year book. Food and Agricultural Organization of United Nations. FAO Statistics Series, Rome, Italy, Vol. 52. p. 64.
  7. Goto, M. 1995. Ammoniation of barley straw; effect on anatomical and physiochemical characteristics of the cell walls. Ann. Zootech. 44, 70. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19950540
  8. Hossain, S. A. and M. S. Rahman. 1981. Comparative feeding value of urea treated and untreated paddy straw. In:Proceedings of the second annual seminar on Maximum Livestock Production from Minimum Land. Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh. pp. 225-233.
  9. Ibrahim, M. N. M., A. M. U. Wajerame and M. J. I. Costa. 1985. Effect of different sources of urease on the treatment time and digestibility of urea-ammonia treated rice straw. Agric. Wastes. 13:197-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(85)90034-4
  10. Jayasuriya, M. C. N. and H. G. D. Prera. 1981. Urea-ammonia treatment of rice straw to improve the nutritive value for ruminants. Agricultural Wastes. (In press).
  11. Jayasuriya, M. C. N. and G. R. Pearce. 1983. The effect of urease enzyme on treatment time and the nutritive value of straw treated with ammonia as urea. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 6:123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(81)90043-2
  12. Joy, M., F. Munoz, X. Alibes. and J. D. Andueza. 1996. Effect of moisture content and addition of ureases on the effectiveness of urea treatment. ITEA-Prod. Anim. 1996, 92A:1, 11-20, 34.
  13. Khan, M. J., J. R. Scaife and F. D. Hovell. 1999. The effect of different sources of urease enzyme on the nutritive value of wheat straw treated with urea as a source of ammonia. Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 12:1063-1069. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.1999.1063
  14. Kiangi, E. M. I., J. A. Kategible and F. Sundstol. 1981. Different sources of ammonia for improving the nutritive value of low quality roughages. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 6:377-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(81)90016-X
  15. Leng, R. A. 1984. Supplementation of tropical and subtropical pasture for ruminant production. In: Herbivore Nutrition in Subtropics and Tropics (Ed. F. C. M. Gilchrist and R. I. Mackie). The Science Press, Graghall, South Africa. pp. 129-144.
  16. Males, J. R. 1987. Optimizing the utilization of cereal crop residues for beef cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 65:1124-1130. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1987.6541124x
  17. Saadullah, M., M. Haque. and F. Dolberg. 1981b. Treated and untreated rice straw to growing cattle. In: Proceedings of the Second Annual Seminar on Maximum Livestock Production from Minimum Land. Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh, Bangladesh. pp. 136. 155.
  18. Sarwar, M., M. A. Iqbal, C. S. Ali and K. Tanweer. 1994. Growth performance of buffalo male calves as affected by using cowpea and soybean seeds as a source of urease during ureatreated wheat straw ensiling process. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 32:23-28.
  19. Sharma, D. D. and K. K. Singh. 1988. Processing of complete feeds for ruminants. In: Proceding of National Seminar cum Workshop and Exhibition on Dairy products and Equipments. IDA, Delhi, India.
  20. Silva, A. T. and E. R. Orskov. 1988. The effect of five different supplements on the degradation of straw in sheep given untreated barley straw. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 19:289-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(88)90091-0
  21. Singh, G. P. and S. J. Oosting. 1991. Nutritive value of straw. In:Proceedings of International Workshop, National Dairy Research Institute (NDRI), Karnal, Haryana, India.
  22. Tareque, A. M. M. and M. Saadullah. 1988. Feed availability requirements and current pattern of utilization in Bangladesh. In: Proceeding on Non Conventional Feed Resources and Fibrous Agricultural Residues (Ed. C. Devendra). Hisar, India. pp. 116-130.
  23. Tiwari, S. P., U. B. Singh and U. R. Mehra. 1988. Urea mineral molasses block as feed supplement on digestibility and growth in buffalo calves. In: Abstract of Symposium on Latest Research Trends, in Livestock and Poultry. 53:31.
  24. Walli, K. T., K. T. Sampath, S. N. Rai. and S. Tamminga. 1993. Feeding of ruminants on fibrous crop residues (Ed. Singh K. and J. Schiere). In: Proceedings Int. Workshop held at the NDRI on the Aspect of treatment, feeding, nutrient evaluation, research and extension. Haryana, India. Feb. 4-8. 1991. pp.157-168.
  25. Wanapat, M. 1983. Improving the rice straw quality as ruminant feed by urea treatment in Thailand (Ed. M. Wanapat and C. Devendra). In: Proceedings of the International Conference on the Relevance of Crop Residues as Animal Feed in Developing Countries. Khon Kaen University, Khon Khaen, Thailand, Funny Press, Bangkok. pp. 147-175.
  26. Wanapat, M. 1990. Review on buffalo feeding trial in Thailand. In:Nutritional Aspects of Ruminant Production in South-East Asia with special reference to Thailand (Ed. M. Wanapat). Thailand. p. 30.

피인용 문헌

  1. Effects of replacing fish meal with soy cake in a diet based on urea-treated rice straw on performance of growing Laisind beef cattle vol.45, pp.4, 2013, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-012-0304-0
  2. Incremental ratio of urea: Urease in alkaline hydrolysis of dried kume grass (Sorghum plumosum var. Timorense) improves its nutritive values vol.1469, pp.None, 2002, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1469/1/012020
  3. Lignin and Cellulose Content of Fermented Rice Straw with Aspergillus niger (van Tieghem) and Trichoderma mutan AA1 vol.226, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202122600043
  4. Effects of starter protein content and alkali processing of wheat straw on growth, ruminal fermentation, and behavior in Holstein calves vol.104, pp.3, 2002, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2020-19247