DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Replacement of Groundnut Cake with Urea-treated Neem (Azadirachta indica A. juss) Seed Kernel Cake on Nutrient Utilisation in Lambs

  • Musalia, L.M. (Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute) ;
  • Anandan, S. (National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology) ;
  • Sastry, V.R.B. (Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute) ;
  • Katiyar, R.C. (Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute) ;
  • Agrawal, D.K. (Division of Animal Nutrition, Indian Veterinary Research Institute)
  • 투고 : 2001.05.28
  • 심사 : 2002.04.30
  • 발행 : 2002.09.01

초록

The effect of urea treatment on chemical composition of neem seed kernel cake (NSKC) was investigated by soaking the cake in 2.1% urea solution (1.2 l $kg^{-1}$ NSKC) for five days. The effect on utilisation of nutrients by replacing groundnut cake (GNC) (30%) with urea-treated neem seed kernel cake (UTNSKC) (33%) in a concentrate mixture fed to meet 70% of the protein requirements of lambs (8 males and 8 females), was monitored in a digestibility study. Following urea treatment of NSKC only 9.5% of urea was hydrolysed and the crude protein content of the cake was increased by 6.65%. The tannin content in depulped neem seeds was 37% catechin equivalent. Whereas feeding UTNSKC had no effect on intake of dry matter (72.5 vs 66.3 g/kg $BW^{0.75}day^{-1}$) and digestibility of crude fibre (41.3 vs 43.4%), the cake depressed (p<0.01) the percent digestibility of dry matter (63.7 vs 70.2), crude protein (63.2 vs 70.2), nitrogen free extract (73.8 vs 80.5) and gross energy (64.3 vs 69.1). Digestibility of ether extract (75.8 vs 70.9%) was higher (p<0.05) in animals offered UTNSKC. The nutritive value of the composite ration consumed by lambs offered UTNSKC was lower (p<0.01) in terms of total digestible nutrients (64.7 vs 70.2%) and digestible energy (2.8 vs 3.0 Kcal/g DM). Intake of digestible energy (199.8 vs 194.1 Kcal/kg $BW^{0.75}day^{-1}$) and retention of nitrogen (7.53 vs 8.23 g $day^{-1}$) and calcium (2.12 vs 1.84 g $day^{-1}$) were comparable on the 2 rations. Animals fed UTNSKC retained less (p<0.01) phosphorus (0.37 vs 1.05 g $day^{-1}$). The results indicate that urea treatment increased the protein level of NSKC whereas feeding the treated cake as a replacement of GNC, lowered the digestibility of nutrients and retention of phosphorus.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Agrawal, D. K., A. K. Garg and K. Nath. 1987. The use of water washed neem (Azadirachta indica) seed kernel cake in feeding of buffalo calves. Short note. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 108:497-499. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600079545
  2. Anandan, S., V. R. B. Sastry, L. M. Musalia and D. K. Agrawal. 1996. Growth rate and nutrient efficiency of growing goats fed urea ammoniated neem (Azadirachta indica) seed kernel meal as protein supplement. Small Rumin. Res. 22:205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(96)00889-9
  3. AOAC. 1984. Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 13th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, D.C. pp. 125-131.
  4. Bedi, S. P. S., V. K. Vijjan and S. K. Ranjhan. 1975. Effect of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed cake on growth and digestibility of nutrients in crossbred calves. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 45:618.
  5. Burns, R. E. 1963. Methods of tannin analysis for forage crop evaluation. Georgia Agric. Exp. Tech. Bull. No. 32:1-14.
  6. Elangovan, A. V., S. V. S. Verma, V. R. B. Sastry and S. D. Singh. 2000. Effect of feeding neem (Azadirachta indica) kernel meal on growth, nutrient utilisation and physiology of Japanese quails (Coturnix cotrnix japonica). Asian-Aus. J. Anim. Sci. 13:1272-1277. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2000.1272
  7. Garg, A. K. 1989. Studies on deoiled neem (Azadirachta indica) seed cake as cattle feed. Ph.D. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.
  8. Griffiths, D. W. and G. Mosley. 1980. Effect of diet containing field beans of high and low polyphenolic content on the activity of digestive enzymes in the intestine of rats. J. Sci. Food Agric. 31:255-259. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740310307
  9. Gupta, R. S. and M. V. Bhaid. 1981. Studies on agro-industrial byproducts: Deoiled neem fruit cake in sheep feed composition. Indian Vet. J. 58:311-315.
  10. Hogg, M. L. 1967. Methods for the estimation of urea in foods. In: Urea as a Protein Supplement (Ed. M. H. Briggs). Pergamon press, London, pp. 455-461.
  11. Katiyar, R. C., V. R. B. Sastry and D. K. Agrawal. 1991. Urea and alkali treated neem seed kernel cake as livestock feed. Annual report. Animal Nutrition Division, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.
  12. Maynard, L. A., J. K. Loosli, H. F. Hintz and R. G. Warner. 1979. Animal Nutrition. 7th ed. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York. p. 199.
  13. Musalia, L. M., S. Anandan, V. R. B. Sastry and D. K. Agrawal. 2000. Urea-treated neem (Azadirachta indica) seed kernel cake as a protein supplement for lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 35:107-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(99)00085-1
  14. Nagalakshmi, D. N. 1993. Performance of broiler chicks fed processed neem (Azadirachta indica) as a protein supplement. M.V.Sc. Thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India, pp. 126-130.
  15. Nath, K., D. K. Agrawal, Q. Z. Hassan and S. J. Daniel. 1989. Water washed neem (Azadirachta indica A. juss) seed kernel cake in the feeding of milch cows. Anim. Prod. 48:497-502. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003356100004013
  16. Nath, K., S. Rajagopal and A. K. Garg. 1983. Water washed neem (Azadirachta indica) seed kernel cake as a cattle feed. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 101:323-326. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002185960003762X
  17. Nath, K. and K. Vijjan. 1976. Palatability of alcohol treated neem seed cake. In: Utilisation of Neem (Azadirachta indica A. juss) and its by-products (Ed. C. M. Ketkar). Final Technical Report. Khadi and Village Industries Commission . Pune, India
  18. Nelson, T. S., E. L. Stephenson, A. Burgos, J. Floyd and J. O. York. 1975. Effect of tannin content and dry matter digestion on energy utilisation and average amino acid availability of hybrid sorghum grains. Poult. Sci. 54:1620-1623. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.0541620
  19. NRC. 1985. Nutrient requirements of sheep. National Academy Press, Washington DC.
  20. Price, M. L., S. Van Scoyoc and L. G. Butler. 1978. A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J. Agric. Food Chem. 26:1214-1218. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf60219a031
  21. Rajagopal, S. and K. Nath. 1981. Note on the nutritive value of cake of neem seed kernel. Indian J. Anim. Sci. 51:661-663.
  22. Reddy, K. V. C. 1992. Performance of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves fed alkali treated and urea-ammoniated neem (Azadirachta indica.A.juss) seed kernel cake incorporated rations. M.V.Sc thesis, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, India.
  23. Sahrawat, K. L. 1982. Comparative evaluation of Karanjin and extracts of Karanja and neem seeds for retardation of nitrification of urea in soil. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci. 30:156-159.
  24. Snedecor, G. W. and W. G. Cochran. 1989. In: Statistical methods, 6th ed. Oxford and IBH Publishing company, New Delhi.
  25. Swift, R. W., E. J. Thacker, A. Black, J. W. Bratzler and W. H. James. 1947. Digestibility of rations for ruminants as affected by proportion of nutrients. J. Anim. Sci. 6:432. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1947.64432x
  26. Vijjan, V. K., H. C. Tripathi and N. S. Parihar. 1982. A note on the toxicity of neem (Azadirachta indica) seed cake in sheep. J. Environ. Biol. 3:47.