The korean journal of orthodontics (대한치과교정학회지)

The Korean Association Of Orthodontists (대한치과교정학회)
권호 표지

Soft tissue cephalometric analysis of Aesthetic Korean female

심미적 측모에 관한 두부계측방사선학적 연구

  • Kim, Yoon-Ji (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Nahm, Dong-Seok (Department of Orthodontics, College of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 김윤지 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실) ;
  • 남동석 (서울대학교 치과대학 교정학교실)
  • Published : 2002.12.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide data on the normative values of some clinically important soft tissue dimensions for adult Korean females with aesthetically beautiful facial profiles. Lateral cephalograms of 18 Korean female models, who were selected for their well balanced and aesthetic facial profiles, were evaluated. All cephalograms were taken with the subjects in a natural head position with the teeth in occlusion and the lips at rest. The means and standard deviations were determined and presented. In addition, comparisons with the previous studies were performed The results of the present study were as follows: 1. The upper and lower lips were posteriorly located in relation to the Ricketts' E line (Upper lip to E line: -2.08, Lower lip to E line: -0.04). 2. Both lips were more posteriorly located than those in the results of previous studies on Korean females selected by normal occlusion, but more anteriorly located than in the results of studies selected on an aesthetic basis. 3. The nasolabial angle for this sample was 101.03 degrees with a standard deviation of 8.47 degrees.

본 연구의 목적은 심미적 안모를 가진 한국 성인 여성을 대상으로 연조직 측모 분석을 시행하여 현재 선호되는 안모 형태를 알아보고, 국내 및 국외 연구 결과와 비교하여, 향후 교정치료 및 악교정수술 복합교정치료시 진단과 치료 계획수립에 도움이 되고자 하는 것이다. 연구 대상은 조화롭고 심미적인 안모를 가지며 competent lip을 가진 30명의 성인 여자 모델이었다. 이들을 natural head position에서 중심교합 상태 및 상하순을 이완시킨 상태에서 측모 두부계측방사선 사진과 정모, 측모 사진을 촬영하여 18명을 최종 선정하였다 연조직 측모의 각도, 거리, 비율 계측을 시행하여 평균과 표준 편차를 구하였고 국내외의 다른 연구와 비교하여 다음과 같은 결과를 얻었다. 1. 상하순은 Ricketts' E line에 대해서 모두 후방에 위치하였다(상순 : -2.08mm to E line, 하순 : -0.04 mm to E line). 2. 정상교합자를 대상으로 한 이전의 연구에 비해서는 상하순 모두 후방에 위치하였고, 심미성을 기준으로 선정한 이전의 연구에 비해서는 상하순 모두 전방에 위치하였다. 3. 이 대상의 비순각의 평균은 101.03도이며 표준편차는 8.47도였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Bass NM. The aesthetic analysis of the face, Eur J Orthod 1991 : 13 : 343-50 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/13.5.343
  2. Burstone CJ. Integumental contour and extension patterns. Angle Orthod 1959 : 29 : 93-104
  3. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics, Angle Orthod 1970: 40 :284-317
  4. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod 1983 : 84 : 1-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(83)90144-6
  5. Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. Part II. Am J Orthod 1984 : 85 : 279-93 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90185-4
  6. Czarnecki ST, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1993: 104: 180-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81008-X
  7. Hellman CH. A philosophy of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod 1945 : 31 : 74 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0096-6347(45)90163-3
  8. Sutter RE, Turley PK. Soft tissue evaluation of contemporary Caucasian and African American female facial profiles. Angle Orthod 1998 : 68 : 487-96
  9. Arnette GW, Jelic JS, Kim J, et. al Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: Diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial de-formity. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1999 : 116 : 239-53 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(99)70234-9
  10. Brons R. Facial harmony: Standards for orthognathic surgery and orthodontics. Quintessence publishing Co, Ltd. 1993
  11. Farkas LG, Katie MJ, Hreczko TA, et. al Anthropometric propor-tions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face in young white adults. Am J Orthod 1984 : 86 : 52-60 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90276-8
  12. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg 1978 : 38 : 744-51
  13. McNamara JA Jr, Brust EW, Riolo ML. Soft tissue evaluation of individuals with an ideal occlusion and a wellbalanced face. In : McNamara JA Jr., ed. Esthetics and the treatment of facial form. Monograph 28, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, 1993
  14. Powell N, Humphreys B. Proportions of the aesthetic face. New York. Thieme-Sratton Inc. New York 1984
  15. Scheideman GB, Bell WH, Legan HL, Finn RA, Reisch JS. Cephalomeric analysis of dentofacial normals. Am J Orthod 1980 : 78 : 404-20 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(80)90021-4
  16. Carconas SJ, Bartroft JD. Prediction of normal soft tissue facial changes. Angle Orthod 1975 : 45 : 12-25
  17. Jacobson A. Radiographic cephalometry. From basics to vide-oimaging. 1995 publishing Co, Inc.
  18. Ki-Su Lee, Kyu-Rim Chung. Cephalometric analysis on the skeletofacial pattern of the Korean adult with normal occlusion. Kor J Orthod 1987 : 17 : 199-214
  19. Seung-Hak Baek, Won-Sik Yang: A soft tissue analysis on facial esthetics of Korean young adults. Kor J Orthod 1991 : 21 : 131-70
  20. Je-Kyung Woo, Oh-Won Kwon, Jae-Hyun Sung. A cephalo-metric analysis on esthetic facial soft tissue of Korean young adult female. Kor J Orthod 1997 : 27 : 245-58
  21. Joon-Row, Young-Kyu Rhu. A cephalometric analysis on facial esthetics of Korean young adult female. Kor J Orthod 1988 : 18: 127-39
  22. Dahlberg AG. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publica-tions, 1940
  23. Auger TA, Turley PK. changes in the esthetic soft tissue profile as presented by the mass media during the 1900s : A photographic analysis. J Dent Res Special Issue, Abstracts of Papers. 1996: 75 : 336 -2549
  24. Cox NH, Van der Linden FPGM. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 1971 : 60 : 175-83 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(71)90033-9
  25. De Smit A, Dermout L. Soft tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984: 86: 67-73 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90278-1
  26. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991 : 49 : 963-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(91)90060-Y
  27. Thomas RG. An evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in the North American black woman. Am J Orthod 1979 : 76 : 84-94 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(79)90302-6
  28. II-Su Baek, Young-Kyu Rhu. A cephalometric study on the adolescent with normal occlusion. Kor J Orthod 1982 : 12: 177-91
  29. Won-Yu Lee, Byung-Wha Sohn. A cephalometric study on the norm of Korean adult with normal occlusion. Kor J Orthod 1984 : 14: 135-49
  30. Merrifield LL. The profile lines as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1966 : 52 : 804-822 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(66)90250-8
  31. Lines PE, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilometrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978 : 73: 648 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(78)90225-7
  32. National Dental Schoool Orthodontic Professor Association: Orthodontics, Seoul: Jisung Publishing: Narae Publishings, 1998 : 589-95